ipl-logo

When Was Julius Caesar Justified Analysis

984 Words4 Pages

Right before the play starts, Julius Caesar has just returned to Rome after a victory over
Spain. The whole first part of the play is mostly about how Caesar could accept the crown and become king, which would ruin everything Rome has become. So, in order to stop that from potentially happening, Cassius convinces Caesar's very good friend, Brutus, to helphim and a bunch of other men kill Caesar. Then, Brutus makes this big speech after just murdering Caesar about how the murder was justified and his reasons for it. Carrying out Caesar’s lifeless body is
Mark Antony, who also gives a speech, contradicting Brutus's speech about the justification. In
Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony delivers a stronger and more persuasive funeral oration …show more content…

who is here so rude that would not be Roman... who is here so vile that will not love his country...”, in order to justify his actions and not get into trouble with the people of Rome. He says this in order to play at the people’s love and honor for the country, making them feel bad if they don’t agree with his justifications because then they wouldn’t be “Roman”. This could be persuasive, but I don’t think it’s a very strong ethical reason. Mark Antony’s speech, on the other hand, isn’t about justifying his reason for not agreeing with Brutus, but about what’s right. Antony says “when the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept...did this in Caesar seem ambitious... I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition... I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong, who, you all know are honorable men: I will not do them wrong; I rather choose to wrong myself and you, than I will wrong such honorable men...”. His speech is to show that Caesar was indeed not going to take the crown, yet Brutus and Cassius kept insisting that he would, which was their whole justification on the murder, and they are honorable. His use of ethos was very

Show More
Related
882 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar: Analysis of Tone in Funeral Speeches MLK, Jr. once said, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends” (Goodreads). In the play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, actions and words are used and spoken against a friend and a rival contributing to the assassination of their fellow friend Caesar. Two people that were very close to Caesar speak out against each other during their funeral speeches. Brutus, who is a “friend” and also a conspirator against Caesar, and Antony who is a very loyal friend to Caesar, use several rhetorical and literary devices as they create tone of proud assertive and defiant manipulation to get the Roman citizens on their side.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

In Act III, Scene II, both Brutus and Mark Antony give very important and interesting speeches, revealing much of their personalities and characters. Caesar has just been killed; stabbed to death by a group of his closest "friends", including Brutus, whom he loved greatly. Antony went to see Caesar’s body with courage, and to speak with the group of conspirators, so that he can fully understand their reasoning behind the murder of Roman politician Julius Caesar. Brutus trusts Antony when he says that he is on their side, but Cassius fears (and guesses) that Antony would betray them in the end. Both Brutus and Antony have a speech in front of a plentiful crowd, using opposing rhetoric appeals.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Should Caesar have been assassinated? The people of Rome liked him and chose him as dictator and the only reason it happened was because the senate thought he wanted to be king when he was barely a dictator. Think about it if the people of Rome chose he isn't he more like a president. Therefore the assassination of Caesar was not justified for these and the other reasons that he was compassionate, helpful, and grew Rome.

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar is a Hero Why is Caesar's assationation still fascinating? Julius Caesar was a Rome dictator and part of the first triumvirate with Pompey and Crassus. He was a senator, consul and then governor in Gaul. He was a great leader with strong speaking skills and showed compassion to others. He strived to be a great leader but that was his downfall.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Within Antony’s speech to the Romans he uses anaphoric text to spike a whirl of rage towards Brutus. Repeatedly Antony states “Brutus is an honorable man” emphatically for the duration of his speech to contradict Brutus’s nobility ( March Antony, Lines 83,88,95 ). Before Antony begins his speech he is approached by the Romans with comments to not speak bad on Brutus’s name, which is why he utilized the anaphora to repeat that Brutus is an honorable man therefore allowing him to gain the Romans trust to speak. Antony does not say these lines truthfully but sarcastically to make the people of Rome feel furious against Brutus for taking Caesar to his mortal death.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony uses rhetorical appeals and techniques in his speech to turn the people of Rome against those conspiring against Caesar. As a result, the people see Antony as a persuasive and strong leader of Rome. Antony opens his speech at Caesar’s funeral by using ethos to present himself as a credible source and a friend of Caesar. Antony states his purpose in the beginning of his speech by starting with “I come to bury

Read More
395 Words | 2 Pages

Julius Caesar Argumentative Essay If you were a Roman in the B.C. ages, whose speech would you believe Antony’s or Brutus’? In the play “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare , two men which were close friends to Caesar gave a speech about Julius’ death and tried to make the Romans believe their speech. Antony’s speech seems to be much more effective because he uses facts.

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

This is ethos in the way it gives him credibility as a friend, suggesting that he would truly know Caesar. But, it is also pathos because it makes the crowd sorrowful for him because someone that is close to him has been killed. The use of ethos, logos and pathos made Marc Antony’s argument and speech far superior to Brutus’s. Another reason that makes Marc Antony’s argument more valuable is

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Is a good deed still a good deed when looked at from an ice cold eye? Was it ever really a good deed at all? It’s all about perspective. In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, ethos, pathos, and logos is used to show both sides of a deed that was good in one eye and cold in the other. He uses ethos to show the credibility of the speeches, logos to show facts given, and pathos to show the emotion shown throughout the eulogies.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Antony wanted people to be patient with him. He also says, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (3.2. 100-101). Antony says this to show that Caesar was a good man who cared about the people. It was also to show that Brutus was wrong when he stated that Caesar was ambitious. Antony makes the citizens feel that the conspirators murder was

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

There are two reasons why Antony gave this speech. The first was to get back at Brutus for murdering his beloved friend, and making him pay for it. The main reason Antony gave this speech is because he had a greed for power. He thought that if he could get all the plebeians on his side, that they would attack the conspirators and trust Antony, therefore making it easy to take on the spot for power. “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, To cut the head off and then hack the limbs, Like wrath in death and envy afterwards, For Antony is but a limb of Caesar.

Read More

More about When Was Julius Caesar Justified Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document