Read through Edwin Sutherland’s classic 1940 article, “White Collar Criminality,” the idea of class bias in criminology, how the law enforcement acts differently with the crime from different social classes and also the basic idea of differential association was introduced. On the other hands, read through chapter six in "Essentials of Sociology" which written by George Ritzer, some more detail information about crime was introduced, the population of prisoner in the US and the importance of reducing the amount of prisoner was talked about in the first part, the various types of crimes was introduced in the second part, however, it also states that white-collar crimes are not considered equally abhorrent as the other kinds of crimes. It shows that even though it has been for many decades, people still not paying enough attention to white-collar crime. At the last part of the chapter, globalization of crime activity was talked about. These two studies give a pretty good idea of what crime is about. …show more content…
If Sutherland still alive today, he would be disappointed that even until today, white-collar crime is still not considered as serious as other crimes even though it can have huge effects on the society and contains a lot more victims. According to his opinion, the loss of one single white-collar crime could be a couple hundred times more than robberies and burglaries. And it could have a much larger social impact than robbery. Especially in the case of Lehman Brothers during 2008, when a company becomes incredibly powerful, the misconduct of the company could lead to a global recession and impact countless