Why Did Karl Marx Argue My Opinion Against Government Regulation?

545 Words3 Pages

In conclusion, I will always stand against government regulation, not only it creates commercial headaches, it harmed society at large by breaking the rights of the masses. To me the best contribution a government can make to society is to leave people to their own business and planning, and if I were to be your next president, i will make that the case for all, only exception of government interfering there will be is that we will enforce contracts, copyrights, and such. Thank you for taking the time to listen to me, hope all is well. Part 2 Welcome ladies and gentlemen, as many of you know, I am karl Marx here to run to be your next president. Now you all know of the communist manifesto that I had come up with, which shows the path im …show more content…

Each of them currently play a certain role to make up pur society today, but the question asked, are the roles they are contributing to seen as fair to everyone? I’n my opinion, it is not, and I would like to work towards that, and see a change happen someday. Currently, it is seen as the proletariat are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie employ proletarians in their factories, businesses and farms. The proletarians are paid a certain amount of money to get their work done, now the problem is that they are not getting paid enough, because later on, the bourgeoisie use the all the proletarian workers to make goods that are being sold and exported for more money than what the proletarian are getting paid. The bourgeois businessman keeps whatever profit is gained from what they call business, and becomes very wealthy from the labour of the proletariat, while the proletariat’s status stays the same. So I see no change in the social class at that rate, and this is why Adam Smith’s laissez-faire proposal is ineffective, because it will keep everything how it is, and allow the middle and upper classes