ipl-logo

Why Did Laura And Howies Excursion Not Justifiable?

661 Words3 Pages

Treason, theft, property damage breaking and entering are all considered crimes that warrant punishment, Right? Wrong. Apparently when two kids run away break into homes, steal food and money, break a man's foot and breaking into hotels they shouldn't be punished. Laura and Howies excursion is not justifiable by the circumstances. They were immature and impulsive. They broke the law, yet no one thinks they should be punished, they hurt people and no one cares. They deserve punishment, not special treatment, they shouldn't turn the other cheek. One vital reason that Howie and Laura should be punished is that they broke the law, repeatedly with no reproductions. The text provides evidence that the sheriff won't be pressing charges, Margo Cutter tells Ms.Golden ‘I don't think sheriff Prosser will be pressing charges’’(p. 166). The circumstance was that they were bullied, this does not warrant criminal activity. It is saying that this proves that they are delinquents. With lack of repercussions their delinquent actions will continue, they're don’t realize it's wrong. One might argue that the circumstance was so dire, …show more content…

I have already stated that they are delinquents, but they are also threats to society. If the path that the sheriff was one was the only path they could take, it would be fine and I would defend them, but no, there were hundreds of other ways they could have gone. They did it just to do it. The treason was unnecessary. She just decided to hit him turn the wheel the slightest bit and I would have been fine. Accident? No, this was a choice. One might defend saying that they were scared and that they were trying to remove the threat. This is a legitimate argument, but it is still flawed, by saying this they are denying the fact that they were okay with running over a

Show More
Related
583 Words | 3 Pages

Why are the government doing this to the Oregonian ranchers Dwight and Steve Hammond? The ranchers starting a fires on federal land near their ranch were convicted of federal arson charges. The father and son received both a pair sentences which by the way they served. But here is where it gets confusing the United States attorney case called foul and government ruling that Dwight and Steve Hammond will be given the seriousness of arson, a five year sentence disproportionate to the offense and each individual will serve out their five-years not including the first sentence that they already served. Why are the ranchers getting prosecuted for terrorism and where is the tyranny?

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Johnny Cade should be charged with involuntary manslaughter. He should be in Jail for 16 months due to the murder of Bob Sheldon. My reasons why he should be charged with involuntary manslaughter and nothing more serious is 5 socs that were coming for them were underage drinkers which affected the choices they made. My second reason is David should be charged with the attempted murder of Ponyboy Curtis and Johnny was saving his friend. My final reason is Johnny admits to killing Bob Sheldon with his switchblade.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Prisoners of the past, doomed to repeat a mistake. Human nature tells us to rationalize or justify the means to which we procure the end result. For example, there are some lessons you learn. When being pulled over for speeding, the ticket reinforces the idea to pay mind to the speed limit. With the lesson in mind you will be less likely to repeat the same mistake in theory again after paying a fine.

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

It is hard for the average person to support the unconditional release of someone who is not sorry in the slightest for their actions. Lane is trying to show the divide between the two cases in this passage by highlighted how one supposedly is sorry for their actions. Whilst the other still stands firm and refuses to denounce violence that they enacted and the violence that they had

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine your friend had lead you into the woods and stabbed you 19 times throughout your body. Anissa and her friend Morgan alledgy stabbed another 12 year old 19 times after leading her into the woods in order to please a fictional character. Morgan and Anissa should be tried as adults with lower sentences and therapy because of the severity of the crime, her age, and her mental health. The two friends should be tried as adults with lower sentence because of how serious the crime was.

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

14th Amendment Due Process Clause It certainly is remarkable that the United States Constitution refers to “due process” twice. Therefore, the 5th Amendment’s allusions to “due process” state that nobody can be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. "

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Did you ever think that a 16 year old kid can kill 4 people and injure 9? Well a boy named Ethan Couch did so in a little town in Texas. I believe Ethan should be charged with adult maximum sentence and therapy. Ethan should be tried as the severity of the crime. “Texas teenager Ethan Couch, who killed 4 people and injured 9, in a drunk driving crash”(Ashford).

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

In that case, the serial killer got their way and did whatever it took to get what they

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

The movie “Loving” is based on a true story, and it depicts the lives of Richard and Mildred Loving, an interracial couple, living in Virginia. In 1958, the couple went to Washington D.C and got married. They married here for the reason that interracial marriage was banned in Virginia. Yet, when they got back home, they were arrested. They spent the expanse of nine years struggling for their right to live as family in their town.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

A kid is a kid until the age of eighteen, then in the eyes of the law they are legally an adult. So why do the court systems trial a juvenile as an adult at the age of thirteen or fourteen? Mistakes are made and when the courts put kids behind bars for a life sentence and are not giving them the chance to change. To these juveniles, being sentenced to life is a slap in the face says to them that they will never have the chance of fixing or learning from that mistake that they have made. That they have to face a life sentence and have that burden on them forever.

Read More
255 Words | 2 Pages

In the story the Odyssey Odysseus travels from island to island to try to get back home to see his son and wife. Once Odysseus returned to Ithaca he soon realize the wooers had taken over his house and possessions. I believe justice was served because they wanted to take his wife, his food, and his wine. I don't think that Odysseus was justified by his actions because he didn't have to act like that. What I mean is he could have banished them instead of killing them.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

What if your loved one was savagely killed by a teenager with no remorse? Juveniles should be convicted as adults for ferocious crimes because even though they are “kids” they kill innocent people and should get punished for the crime they committed. Teenagers commit gruesome crimes like murder and knowing what they are makes the situation far worse. In the article “Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” the author Jennifer Jenkins talks about the teenagers that committed gory murders against innocent people that didn’t deserve to die like a road animal. For example, a 13 year old shot to death an english teacher.

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

In the film Taxi Driver, Travis Bickle, a middle aged man with no proclaimed direction in life in the beginning of the film. He soon enough, through his convictions about the "scum of the city," a love lost, and perhaps mental instability as a result of the Vietnam war, finds meaning in his life and carries it out through controversial actions. According to Merriam-Webster judging is defined as: "to form an opinion about (something or someone) after careful thought. " Whether it be taking a girl out on a first date to a porno movie, or attempting to assassinate a senator, Travis Bickle should be judged by his intentions, rather than the consequences of his actions. When Travis falls for Betsy, the relationship ends up derailing itself on the

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

Two groups of people were arguing about should celebrities face stricter penalties when they committed crimes. One side agreed with stricter penalties come out with the reason celebrities have influence power on people, and celebrities can easily bail themselves out of the jail or pay for the fines. On the other hand, people fight back with the reason human were all equal in front of law and god, and celebrities have already lost their privacy so why being so cruel to them. When celebrities commit crimes, people with different opinions came out with different ideas. Some consider they should confront stricter punishment and some disagree.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

  Second, "Punishment is deserved. Criminal sanctions are justified because those who voluntarily break the law forfeit some of the rights claimed by citizens."  (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pg 6) The guilty get the punishment that they deserve, this justification is

Read More

More about Why Did Laura And Howies Excursion Not Justifiable?

Open Document