ipl-logo

Why Did Rome Succeed In Controlling The Roman Empire

530 Words3 Pages

The Roman empire controlled its people and land but, the Han controlled its people and land more effectively. Of course, Rome could have succeeded in controlling its empire but, by looking at the political, technological, and social aspects, it is clear that the Han left a larger impact to the world and revolutionized life by exercising more effective control overall. The Han controlled its people and territory more harshly than the Romans. Although they were harsher, they also worked more efficiently and took initiative. They generated new order and collected more taxes to support the military and government. By doing that, they had the resources they needed for everyday The military helped protect those items along with the Han people. Rome on the other hand, controlled its empire differently. What the Romans did was have the senate run the government and have geographical features distinguish boundaries. Clearly, the Roman's actions were not as effective as the Han's so, basically, the Han had to control its empire politically in some way and, they acted on that well. …show more content…

To start off, Rome did not succeed in controlling its empire through technology. They managed to develop trading skills but overall, they were far less developed than other countries. Especially when comparing the Romans and the Han, it is clear who achieved more. Again, Rome developed trading and other simple skills. While they were busy doing that, the Han people were inventing paper. From then on, that invention was used every day and “revolutionized Chinese life” (Han Cornell Notes). Not only that but, the Han also used their resources to their advantage and used collar harnesses, plows, and wheelbarrows to help improve farming. All in all, the Han used technology to control its empire

Show More
Related

Unit 7 Han Dynasty

509 Words | 3 Pages

Unit 7 is a rather long section covering both Rome and China 's powerful and expansive empires during the time period 300 BCE - 300 CE. The Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome were very similar in their unprecedented scale and duration. Although they did operate in differing ways, for example, Rome relied on slaves to expand its workforce, while the Chinese 's economy lived off of free peasant farmers. The Chinese benefited from having an overwhelming population that would benefit the bureaucracy and supply political stability for the Hans. When it came to the Roman Empire, religion did not have the same impact that Confucianism had on the dynasties in China.

Read More

How Did The Han Dynasty Build The Western Roman Empire

569 Words | 3 Pages

Another similarity that they had were taxation problems. Difference that they had was, religion. Those two similarities and one difference that these empires had were a big part of why they fell. Barbarian tribes had put up with the Western Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty long enough. The Western Roman empire had the best army, they were the strongest.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ming And Han Dynasty

492 Words | 2 Pages

The two dynasties, the Ming and the Han were both excellent during their period of Prosperity. The two dynasties excelled when it came towards better government education and a whole lot more. I will first give you an example on the Han dynasty, After their previous ruler costed multiple lives of the Han a man named Liu Bang won and he became the new ruler of China and the Han dynasty's first emperor. The Han had helped established a new political system, which basically meant the government administrators took control of states instead of giving the power to a individual ruler. The Han also followed the ideas of Confucianism by believing that their ruler was a father over them and they should not be lead by force.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More

Dbq Han Dynasty

1061 Words | 5 Pages

For decades people have been wondering if the Han dynasty was effective or not. The Han dynasty was the dynasty after the Qin dynasty. Unlike the Qin dynasty that only ruled a short time of fourteen years, the Han dynasty ruled over four hundred years. So with the evidence that I have read, I believe that the Han dynasty was an effective government for a number of reasons.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Han China And Rome

275 Words | 2 Pages

Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty appeared in the era of classical societies. During this time, societies began to become tightly centralized and ideas of new religions and technology were able to spread easier due to the expanding development of new communication forms and passages like the Silk Roads. With the new forms of communication, it is easy to understand why the development of new technology was appearing in these two societies. However, the Han dynasty was more readily open to these new ideas of technology and the development of new technologies such as paper and iron were upheld by the government, while the Roman more readily focused their attention on philosophy and law during their Pax Romana.

Read More

Fall Of The Roman Empire Dbq Essay

789 Words | 4 Pages

After all of these diseases struck the empire it was very difficult to find soldiers fit for battle. This led to Roman military officials recruiting Germanic soldiers to defend Rome. Since the Roman Empire needed to pay for its troops it also needed the money to do this. The empire decided to increase

Read More

Rome And Han China Comparative Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

China on the other hand had more problems in its bureaucracy and civic unrest. For example, some peasants who had lost their farms had to sell their children into service. A third difference is that as previously stated, China had a successful revival while Rome did not. Rome divided and the Western half survived but was diminished by attempts to regulate the economy and decline tax revenue ’s.

Read More

Similarities And Differences Between Imperial Rome And Han China

708 Words | 3 Pages

In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

Read More

Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More

Fall Of Rome Research Paper

468 Words | 2 Pages

Both had social unrest and internal decay. China and Rome both had their bureaucrats assassinated. They received no taxes from their landowners and eventually their landowners formed private armies. To some extent religion also broken up the Han dynasty and Rome. Christianity began to spread in Rome drastically and eventually fracturing the empire.

Read More

Roman Attitude Towards Technology Dbq

941 Words | 4 Pages

China’s Han dynasty and the Romans valued technology in their civilizations, but they used technology for different reasons to accommodate their empire. The Hans relied heavily on agriculture and developed technology to make labor easier and more efficient, which is depicted by some of their technology like iron metallurgy and water systems. In contrast, the Romans focused primarily on science and mathematics, so the intellectuals looked down on technology as it was used by slaves and for their labor. Han China’s attitude towards technology was more appreciative and focused on its benefits toward labor than the Romans who viewed technology as inferior and for the laborers in their class-divided society. All the documents written by the Han,

Read More

Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

1233 Words | 5 Pages

China, up until the Qin Dynasty, consisted of independent states controlled by kings fighting each other for land and power. This time period was called The Era of Warring States, which lasted two hundred years. After this time, the Qin Dynasty rose to power. They conquered all other dynasties, and established a centralized government, unifying China for the first time. The dynasty that succeeded the Qin, the Han, continued the centralized government and they started a westward expansion that would encourage trade and cultural diffusion.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ottoman And Ming Empires

312 Words | 2 Pages

In final analysis, the Ming Dynasty and the Ottoman Empire were great empires while they lasted. Their leaders had a lot to do with their success. The order in their economic and political structure was crucial to maintaining their empires. Their history will always have an effect on the modern day continents of Asia, Europe and

Read More

Community In The Outsiders

479 Words | 2 Pages

A community seems to be kind of the center of Outsiders. A community is a group of people with a special connection. They revolve around each other an lift one another within the community. A community can also be people who just have something in common, such as people in the same neighborhood. Generally, a community is a group of people with a connection.

Read More

More about Why Did Rome Succeed In Controlling The Roman Empire

Related Topics

Open Document