ipl-logo

Why Did The North Win The Civil War Essay

958 Words4 Pages

The clash between the North and South over slavery, states’ rights, and several other conflict led a civil war in the United States. The Confederate South, which is known for its profound military history, turned out to be no opposition for quickly developing North in the Civil War. The North that was industrialized, strongly equipped realized that a lot of their triumphs were somewhat easily obtainable. Strong leadership, number of troops, and economy are only few of the factors that led to the Union's victory over the Confederate succeeded states. Number of troops, army supply and finance of the war played a role in which side was to win the war. The North had more soldiers than the South due to their bigger population (America, 500). The …show more content…

While the South had good military tactics and strategies but their generals were not as good as the ones the North had such as, Grant and Sherman. For example, Robert E. Lee was criticized for losing the West and thus lost the war. Also, Joseph E. Johnston tended not to take chances in battles. Moreover, the South lost its brave men in the beginning of the war because it misjudged certain situations. Indeed, the North made many mistakes too and that gave an opportunity for the South for victories at some battles. It is clear that the strategies of both sides varied widely, but strong leadership of the North contributed to their …show more content…

The North’s system of transportation contributed a lot in the war. Furthermore, “the Union had more wagons, horses, and ships than the Confederacy and in impressive edge in the number of railroad locomotives” (America, 500). While the North was advancing with it factories so they could get more supplies quicker, the South focused more on growing crops and farming. Many Southerners believed that they would be able to win the war (America,499), but eventually they turned out to be wrong. They were very confident that they had a good group of Generals who were well trained and

Show More
Related
1014 Words | 5 Pages

Castel also has numerous reasons as to why he believes this. Such as better leadership and soldiers. Castel talks about how the southern army had better leadership due to Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. Robert E. Lee a confederate general at the time is known for leading the souths attempt at secession. He also talks about how the south had better soldiers, this is said because the south had soldiers that were more aged and better equipped.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

The North also produced 17 times more cotton than the South, 30 times more leather goods, and more essentials to the war. All and all, the South was seriously out supplied by their counterparts, and still nearly pulled off the upset. This is the first reason why Robert E. Lee is the greatest general of the Civil War. Reason 2: The Confederates had much less men than the Union and Lee nearly still won Going into the war, the Union were the

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

Historian, George Frederickson addresses the blue over the gray and sources of success and failure in the Civil War. He emphasizes the North’s advantages providing many plausible explanations of why the North won. He mentions the North’s advantages in manpower, resources, and industrial capacity. The North had an excess of three to one readily available manpower. For every southern industrial worker, the North had a factory or workshop.

Read More
228 Words | 1 Pages

The union and the confederacy had two completely different fighting styles. Comparing the two, you can see how the north inevitebly won. Their generals

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

For these reasons and many more the North was the real winner of the civil war. Economy, something that is knowing to go up and down all the time. In most situations people would expect war to stress the economy or destroy it. This was not the case for the North. The North’s economy did better during the war.

Read More
1869 Words | 8 Pages

1. North had Advantages over South The North had the numbers period. When it came down to men of battling age, the Union had the edge through around two to one. In any case, similar to I just stated, significantly more Southern men were ready (or even energized) to war. The North also had more noteworthy industrial limit.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The South didn’t use slaves as soldiers but the North recruited black men and included the free slaves after the emancipation proclamation was approved. The South did as well after the emancipation proclamation but it was not as effective as it was for the North because they didn’t have that support from other world powers. If England or France supported the south then we would’ve maybe seen a different outcome because of a greater pressure to make peace but because they supported the North, it helped them in ultimately winning the civil

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Compared to the south’s veteran and their knowledge of the land, the Union’s advantages won out. During the war, the North had better technology for mass producing and creating new weapons

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Do most people know how the North won the Civil War? It is an important factor that changed American history forever. During the Civil War they had sectionalism, life style, slavey and battles. Many people died for now America.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

At the beginning of the Civil War, the Union’s advantages of a greater population and better industrial economy was perceived as though they were on a level far above that of the Confederacy. Though the Union did have the upper hand in those elements, the Confederacy had better trained officers who harnessed superior decision-making skills and battle tactics. While the North held distinct advantages economically, their one glaring deficiency was in its military. When the war began, the Union held 23 states totaling a population of 22 million, while the Confederacy held only 9 states with a population of 9 million, and approximately 4 million of them were slaves. The Union armies outnumbered Confederate armies by a ratio of 2-to-1, roughly.

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

Resources and geography played a substantial role in the battle plans and victory of the Confederates, as well as helped secure a major victory in the U.S. Civil War. During the time of the battle, the Confederates were outnumbered with resources in comparison to the Union. The Union had about 97,382 soldiers, and the Confederates had about 57,352 soldiers. The South was lacking basics like proper food, clothing, shoes, and were weak after the strong winter. They didn’t have sufficient resources due to their inadequacy of wealth.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The rising numbers of death in the South tremendously weakened their army, which allowed for a Northern succession. William C. Davis asserts, “Industrially the South couldn’t keep up in output and in manpower. By the end of the war, the South had, more or less, plenty of weaponry still, but it just didn’t have enough men to use the guns”. Having such a small army, the South was not able to sustain a decent amount of soldiers for the war. Henceforth, the Northern advantage of having more soldiers had a large impact on the Southern loss in the Civil

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

They didn’t have as many solders as the North, due to their small population. But the people they did have fighting on their side were very well trained soldiers, generals, and snipers; due to their many training facilities. This led to their soldiers have a good morale, along with the fact that they were fighting to protect their way of life. The Civil war was also fought on southern soil giving the South a great advantage since they knew the lay of the land and could take advantage of the Northern

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

As a result, they were always unequipped and could not keep up. The North therefore used more efficient weapons while the South used ancient weapons. Furthermore, the North was more populated than the thus those wounded in war were easily replaced by the North as opposed to the South. The Civil War lasted longer than it was anticipated. The American Civil War lasted longer than it was inescapable because of the considerable crevice between the warring parties socially, economically and politically.

Read More

More about Why Did The North Win The Civil War Essay

Related Topics

Open Document