Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fall of rome empire
The fall of rome empire
The fall of rome empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fall of rome empire
The fall of rome empire
The fall of rome empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the things discussed by Watson is how royal and noble authority were established and made secure by means of castles. Royal castles were mainly built as “regional centres, the keys to the administration of their areas, and they were placed at the vital points where also the centres of populations developed.” (Simpson and Webster, 8) This means that castles were built around a preexisting group of people
Land was pivotal to power and stability across kingdoms, it reinforces loyalty to the lords among peasants especially on manor lands as well as it gave the lords soldiers. Greed was also another component which led to disunity as wealthy landowners wanted more than they bargained for. Link: This disunity among the lords led to sieges and battles. Paragraph 2: (119/132) Sieges – QE, GW, Topic: The struggle for power and land resulted in sieges and battles all across Europe with revolutionary weapons.
The Middle Ages were a time where kings and nobles owned the land and serfs worked with little pay. Serfs were like slaves that worked on a farm (Doc. 1). They got one day to farm for themselves and the other six they were working for their king or noble (OI). Nobles and kings had knights called vassals (OI). Vassals were knights who protected and served kings and nobles in exchange for land (OI).
In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.
Why did the social, economic, and political life impact Europe so much in the Middle Ages. To start off, in the Middle Ages, people’s social lives were greatly influenced by their ranking in the feudal system. The feudal system greatly impacted how people could get jobs. Nobles were granted land from the Kings and they started their own little manor. The nobles would give knights land as long as they would go to battle with the noble.
Woube Middle Ages DBQ The middle ages occurred after the fall of Rome. The labels that best describe the Middle Ages would be the Dark Age, the Age of Faith, and the Age of Feudalism. The Middle Ages was labeled as the Dark Ages.
The motte and bailey castles were a design of castles that were much present in England, after the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. The construction of these castles would be the start of a massive castle building program in England and Wales. With the Norman Conquest, William the Conqueror knew they had to build something to protect themselves, so they built the motte and bailey castles, which have been a success for them before. They were able to capture huge areas of land to build their castles and they also built them on areas that they were able to conquer. William would assign a loyal noble of his to a castle and move on to capture new territory.
The Middle Ages led to the Age of Exploration by letting Rome fall. Once rome fell (because the states wanted to be independent), it led to the creation of Feudalism. Feudalism was created from the need of protection because the states didn’t have protection from Rome any more. It also protected kingdoms from other kingdoms or Vikings (pillagers, marauders or terrorist).
This was a result of the constant invasions from the Vikings, Muslims, and Magyars; kings couldn't defend their lands and people no longer looked to a central ruler for security (Doc 7). The Northmen, Vikings, plundered, then burned, towns; most of Europe was an easy target after Rome fell. Also, Charlemagne's three feuding grandsons broke apart Europe and defense became weak (Doc 8). The following reasons support the Dark Ages as being the best label to describe the medieval
The Middle Ages was the time period after the fall of the Roman Empire around 500 CE to the 1350’s. During this time the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope held the most power throughout Europe, the priests often lived in a closed area inside the walls of the monasteries. “Schools were few. Illiteracy was widespread” (Background essay) because of this average person of this time was illiterate .and more than 85 percent of the population were farmers and peasants called serfs and they worked in an estate for the owner called the lord.
“ During the Middle ages much of Europe passed through a time of turmoil and confusion, of ignorance and lawlessness. Europe suffered a decline in commerce and manufacturing, in education, in literature and the arts, and in almost all that makes possible a high civilization. Europe became a a region of poverty-stricken farming communities, each virtually isolated from
As the Roman Empire began to crumble, kingdoms began to take control of Europe. These kingdoms flourished into large countries with sophisticated governments. But, economic and political struggles came to a front at the beginning of the late Middle Ages. A division rose between Western and Eastern Europe even though the two had similar origins. The eastern half followed the principles of the Byzantine Empire, while the western half stuck to its imperial Roman roots.
In the BBC article How Western Civilization Could Collapse by Rachel Nuwer, I both agree and disagree with some points. For one, I completely agree with the concept that western society is going to collapse unless we, as a society, does something to prevent our own demise. Yet, the points that Nuwer provides aren’t all necessarily true (in my opinion). For example, Nuwer states, “Also paralleling Rome, Homer-Dixon predicts that western societies’ collapse will be preceded by a retraction of people and resources back to their core homelands.” [1] Western societies “failing” economies are much more successful compared to other civilizations, say the Middle East.
Intro: Successful civilizations have risen throughout history and appeared unstoppable. One in particular was Rome which existed for hundreds of years, but eventually even the greatest of civilizations fall. Civilizations have a lifespan - this is a theory that many historians disagree with. Though there have been some who believe that all civilizations have a lifespan and that they eventually grow old and die, almost like living things. Paragraph 1:
At one point Roman Empire consisted of whole of the Europe. When the Roman Empire collapsed in 5th AD there was a great power vacuum in Europe. Church grew in power and the old system of Lords was back. After the collapse of the Roman Empire, the states were in constant battles over land. Byzantine Empire and European states now consisted of Europe.