Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard and an author, has stated that “empires inevitably fail, and when they do, history judges them for the legacies they leave behind.” Feldman really hit the nail on the head with regards to describing one of the countless important aspects of history—analyzing it. A positive benefit of evaluating an empire is to examine the reasoning behind the empire thriving, even if it may only be a short period of time. Comparing one empire to another may also solidify one’s beliefs regarding the advances that have contributed elsewhere, as well as explaining its downfall. Although both Imperial Rome and Han China shared a similar strategy to expand their empires yet differed in the governments’ thoughts on an individual’s role in a society and the selection for positions of power, they both exemplify that “an empire is never too big to fail.” …show more content…
Both governments determined that the best tactic for protection was conquering, and they rapidly expanded their empires to prevent the possibility of attacks with the assistance of “barbarians”. This was all possible due to their strong militaries as well as their strong system of government taking the lead. Those that were conquered enjoyed the culture of the empire and mainly adapted, as this was easier to join the larger force than it was to oppose it. This expansion paved the way for the development of roads to connect towns together, which then developed on an international level and allowed for cultures and goods to become easily traded. Many “administration bases” or capital cities shared similar aspects such as public areas and