The United States of America is known as the most free and democratic nation around the world. Our nation has anti-discrimination laws, a strict rule of law, and an even playing field for everyone who resides here. However, most people aren't aware that the US is not truly a democracy, but rather a representative democracy. So when it comes to electing the President of the United States, some would be shocked to find out that that the citizens living here don’t actually elect the “leader of the free world.” That’s the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is a group of people that cast votes for the presidential election, every 4 years, on behalf of the states. This means that the US is not really an absolute democracy, as frequently believed. The president isn't chosen through the popular vote, but rather through individual representatives who cast votes on behalf of the citizens. But this is not necessarily a bad thing, and this way of doing things does not need to be put to an end.
…show more content…
First, this creates an imbalance of how much each citizens votes really counts. Such as California, which has 55 electoral votes and 13 million people who vote in the presidential election, while Wyoming has 3 electoral votes, but only 249,000 voters. This different ratio of votes to voters results in the Wyoming voters being counted as much as 2.87 voters in California (Rudalevige). Another downfall of the Electoral College is that it restricts voters choices. If the US was an absolute democracy there could be 7 candidates running at the same time and the people of the nation would be able to truly find the candidate that represented their believes the