Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership styles
Alexander the great the legacy of his empire
Leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In conclusion, these three factors are proof that Alexander was not as excellent as historians try to prove him to
He was known and still is known as Alexander the Great, till today. To say, Alexander’s empire was 2,000,000 square miles (Document E) after his death and it took him 11 years (Document E) to build his empire (took so much time). Unfortunately, his empire held together only for 10 years (Document E) after his death, which was a very short time. As we know, he was a very intelligent military leader.
The people who were conquered believe that he was brutal and relentless. Based on the information, Alexander was a great military leader and a great king. In the first part of document A, it takes the conquerors perspective of how great Alexander was. It states that he treated some of the rebels with compassion.
He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
First of all, one reason that Alexander was great was because he was a military genius. He was a genius because he conquered so much land and did not stop. In document B it states, “That Alexander made a plan to trick Porus by acting like he was going over the river by making
At the young age of 20 Alexander took over his fathers kingdom and went on to conquer over 2,000,000 square miles of land. Alexander was born in 356 BCE in the Macedonia kingdom, his parents were King Philip and Olympia. From when he was little Aristotle was giving him private lessons on politics, sports, and warfare. After his father shared his dreams of conquering Persia he was assassinated in 336 BCE. Alexander took rule over the kingdom and lead the army.
Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess
Alexander the Great was not great because of his disrespect for others. His Greek officers left him for a village of Hindu Kush people ( Doc F). This demonstrates that if Alexander was so great then why would his officers just leave him unless he did something that made them feel disrespected or feel uncomfortable. Alexander killed trained elephants
(Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove
Without their trust, Alexander would not have achieved as much as he did. These examples show that Alexander was great because they provided insight into what Alexander achieved. He had to work hard to gain the people’s trust. It all paid off when he was able to say that he was the greatest leader of his time. Today, everyone wants a trustworthy leader.
His empire collapsed not long after (Background Essay). Due to his role in the world when he was alive, Alexander the Great’s greatness should be measured
Alexander the Great was a successful leader and tactician. Even though he was successful in these departments, we don’t see much of his politician skills being used. Alexander the Great, born in the northern kingdom of Greece, Macedonia, is easily one of the most famous people in history. Known for conquering most of what they knew as the world, Alexander accomplished a lot. From leadership, to tactics he used in battle, Alexander the Great was a successful man.
Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
But, everyone has accomplishments, accomplishments much like Alexander's, and even greater. So, why does he deserve the title of “the great”? The simple answer is that he does not. He did make accomplishments, and he did evolve and further Greek culture, but he can do all of that without “the great” added to the end of his name. Much like Van-Gough, no one perceived Alexander as great until after he was dead.