Internal Comments: No. While the poem certainly does have a lot of potential in relation to thematic significance, certain lines seem unnecessary and redundant. The author goes on a tangent about a notorious “her”, before jarringly switching back to the scene of the action. Because the submission is so short, it leaves the reader feeling confused and disoriented.
Reading this story made me feel sad at times but covered up the sadness with laughter soon after (that rhyme).In my opinion, when writing this he intended to entertain by making people laugh and it definitely did. Because in his writing, he uses jokingly and sarcastic
This personification not only adds a sense of drama and tension to the poem,
Another portion of the text that is worth analyzing is whether or not the poet is a real person or a generalization about all or most poets. All of the lines in the poem use general text and never label a specific person. What’s interesting about the text is that without the title it would be nearly impossible to distinguish whether or not the person the poem is about is a poet or not. The way the text allows the reader to find a figurative meaning to the poem is by being vague enough and
In the poem Ozymandias, the writer Shelly shows how once an Egyptian pharaoh’s proud boast becomes ironically insignificant; All of Ozymandias's buildings and creations have disappeared and turned into fragments. The civilization he created has been buried and destroyed by the vicious power of history. The ruined statue has now become just a monument to a kingdoms legacy, and it has also become a powerful example of why humans are insignificant as time passes. Ozymandias mainly symbolizes political power because of the impersonal metaphor of the statue.
Ozymandias So let’s begin, or have we already reached the end. “I met a traveler from an antique land...” The Leader stood in the cluttered room, ravaged by the recent flood of rebels. More than standing, he fell into a pathetic stumble, then froze in that unnatural state of eccentricity, until the next spasm broke him from it. With each sporadic twitch, he would be suddenly informed of the strange words playing on his lips.
The Pharaoh Ozymandias or Rameses, as he was identified, was a king who owned a harsh and cold countenance. As stated in the poem, and I quote, “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!” This tells us that he imagined himself a great and powerful ruler and wanted people to despair of him. It could have been because he believed that to be feared means to be obeyed. The imagery used to describe the Ozymandias suggests that he was a cruel man.
Moreover, you can see how the speaker was juggling two and his anger. Therefore, the imagery that is used in this poem helps the reader to really paint a picture of the speaker's
However, after reading the first stanza, it is evident to the reader that, there is oppression in the air. The first stanza reads that, “Dawn in New York has four columns of mire and a hurricane of black pigeons splashing in the putrid waters,” and this is clear to the reader that, the New York Dawn is not a normal dawn and that life in New York is despondent. According to the writer, the dawn does not come with something to smile about. After reading the poem, we realize the writer’s reason for entitling it as such.
In the Jewish exodus times there was a great Egyptian king by the name of Rameses. He was a great architectural creator. I will be comparing the difference between Shelly’s poem titled “Ozymandias” and smith’s poem also titled “Ozymandias”. The poems subjects are different.
“Ozymandias” During the Romantic period, people concentrated on the beauty of nature and the fact that industry ruined it. In the poem, “Ozymandias” by Percy Bysshe Shelley, the theme of nature versus industry is clearly shown. The poem addresses the fact that nature always wins over what man creates. In the beginning of the poem, there is a traveler who sees a statue.
In Line twelve, after the period, through line fourteen the speaker describes the reality of the structure as it lay in rubble. Shelley uses words like “decay” and “wreck” to describe the condition of the structure as the speaker views it has deteriorated from years of withstanding the desert conditions. Shelley then uses words such as “boundless”, “bare”, and “lone” to emphasize that the structure is alone in the desert slowly fading away without concern from society. The irony of the poem is ultimately revealed in lines twelve through fourteen where the demise of the structure is described, in juxtaposition to lines nine through twelve where the statue is described as a structure that will last forever and immortalize Ramses
The traveler affirms, “Nothing beside remains. Round the decay/ Of that colossal Wreck.” Now the reader, while possibly surmising that the kingdom has fallen due to the description of the land earlier in the poem, knows for sure that the former glorious kingdom of Ozymandias is nonexistent anymore. The only piece left of the kingdom was the statue, and at this point it is apparent it is almost completely destroyed. The traveler then finally concludes with, “The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
In fact, the power of time over the past greatness is presented in the second line, where the traveler describes a statue that seemed to be large and impressive in the past, but now only “two vast and trunkless legs of stone” (2) remain. The poet emphasizes the elusiveness of the power by a word “antique” (1), which implies something old and outdated. The next caesurae “Stands in the deserts” (3) creates the sense of loneliness and isolation that surrounds the ruins of the statue. The “shattered” (4) face suggests that nothing is left after the then-powerful person. Using the words “frown”(4), “wrinkled lip” (4) and “cold command” (5), Shelley describes the empire-building and tyrannical ruler.
The use of the word “missile” brings the image of a powerful for that empower these young women and the image mass murder of these young women. The use of the word “cuts” (line 6) bring an image of something sharp that cuts through and changes the thinking of a young women. I feel that the poem highlights the idea that education is a powerful weapon that a human. The poem gives an image of an area of land devoted to cultivation; in this case it is used metaphorically to describe young women who are ready to received education so that they can bear fruits of education. In my case I think the fruits of the education is the tool to women empowerment and for the young women to become critical thinkers but the government does not believe that education should be sown in young women and to be harvested “to an orchard… in a full bloom” (line 8-9).
