ipl-logo

Why Is The Iraq War A Behemoth Of An Institution

853 Words4 Pages

The Iraq War certainly serves as an example of a failure of international consensus to prevent a breach of the peace, and therefore is an indictment of the UN's ability to maintain global peace and security. Whether or not the Iraq War as a phenomenon merits the wholesale replacement of the UN apparatus with a “new, more democratic international institution” is questionable, however. The UN is a behemoth of an institution, with tentacles stretching much farther than the security realm; democracy is not necessarily desirable nor effective in regards to international relations. First and foremost, advocating for the dismantlement and replacement of the United Nations as an institution fails to take into account the major successes of the organization in a number of policy …show more content…

While the term “democracy” sounds appealing as a piece of rhetoric, implementation is an entirely different story. The UN was predicated on the idea that the “democracy” of the League of Nations was the precipitating factor that eventually led to its downfall, and so the Permanent Five of the Security Council was seen as a means to remedy this defect in functionality.1 The fact that the P5 retain a veto is what keeps them working within the framework of the Security Council, as they have a legitimate avenue to implement their agenda that acknowledges their unique position in the international sphere. Therefore, a “more democratic international institution” may not only be too vague, but also actually counterproductive to the stated goal of preventing a repeat of the Iraq War scenario. In a democratic international forum, militarily powerful states will undoubtedly be enticed to find external mechanisms through which to exercise their power. This means that a “democratic” international institution is likely to engender more unilateral military action outside of its framework, not

Show More
Related
696 Words | 3 Pages

After the war and the creation of the United Nations, the U.N decided to make

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Democracy essentially gives the right to liberty and equality of opportunities. Without the vote of the people, society and government are much more susceptible to corruption, resulting in examples such as the dictatorship of North Korea, or the Communistic state of China. Deriving and holding on to the practice of Democracy is what has made the United States the absolute power that it

Read More
1884 Words | 8 Pages

As a former leader of the free world, President Obama evidences and clarifies the benefits and defining qualities of a democracy that encourages for the formation of more democratic forms of government. “Governments that respect the rights of their citizens and abide by the rule of law do better, grow faster, draw more investment than those who don’t” (President Obama). This respect not only establishes a peaceful relationship between the government and its people but also allows freedom to reign. This analysis of the effects of democracy on human rights is necessary, for it is quite evident that in authorities and monarchies these same freedoms are not granted.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

If America did not encourage a democracy among these nations they would have been subjected to communism; this would take away any rights that they would receive by living in a democracy. By extending political and

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Tensions in the 1960’s while President Kennedy was in office almost sent the two superpowers to war. This was called the Cuban Missile Crisis. Amidst the Cold War, the world needed to replace the League of Nations because it failed to prevent another world war. In 1945 the United Nations, UN for short, was created to make sure another global conflict will not happen again. So far it has been successful with the Security Council as the spearhead of this mission.

Read More
1616 Words | 7 Pages

United Nations, United Nations,

Read More
1743 Words | 7 Pages

International order in this article is another word for international society, a key concept of idealism. He explores how the spread of democracy aided the construction of an international society. America’s support for democracy worldwide and its ability to protect people from dictators allowed for the global democratization. (1-2) Democratization is part of the democratic peace theory, which states that democratic states will not fight against each other. Thus, encouraging democratic movements abroad will only benefit the United States by decreasing the number of openly hostile nations.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

The United Nations is an international organization that promotes cooperation between countries and the world. Canada’s involvement in the United Nations has little to no effect because the United Nations has no power. Canada’s impact on the United Nations was insignificant due to corruption, problems in finance, and peacekeeping missions. Canada should not be involved with the United Nations and therefore should leave the organization. The United Nations is corrupt and due to this Canada does little or has no chance to contribute to the organization.

Read More
371 Words | 2 Pages

Many of our respected Canadians are global citizens, and that is how it should be. The fourth argument in favour of prioritizing democracy promotion in our foreign policy—and the one I am most sympathetic to—emerges from Canadian values. Regardless of how well we practice it ourselves, democratic governance is a critical part of our country’s history and a continuing aspiration for its citizens. It also continues to inspire many around the globe who live under repressive governments, as the recent demonstrations by Burmese monks so vividly show.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, this paper is designed to illustrate reasons why the UNSC should be reformed. The first and foremost factor to why the UNSC should be reformed is because the veto power used within the council only revolves around the permanent members’ interests. By 1990s, one

Read More
1446 Words | 6 Pages

On March 20, 2003, one of the most controversial decisions in modern American history was made. George W. Bush sent American troops to invade Iraq in an attempt to remove dictator Saddam Hussein from power. Along with overthrowing Hussein, America would restructure the Iraqi government to align with both democratic principles and American ideologies. Bush justified the actions of his campaign by accusing Iraq of possessing weapons of mass destruction as well as being a threat to global security.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, even more nations will fall into Communism, and not be in democracy. Also, in L.B.J.’s speech “Speech on Vietnam” he says that by tackling this problem now there will be way less of a chance of a nuclear war (Johnson,3). It is better to fight this problem now because in the future it can be more violent. L.B.J stresses in his speech that by going into war there will be less nuclear weapons and less

Read More
3004 Words | 13 Pages

Introduction The hope for this research essay is to try to implement and understand the role of democracy in the case of the Korean War. This research essay will look in depth to see if democracy can truly prevent war and bring peace or if it is irrelevant in what causes war in the international realm. This concept is also known as the Democratic Peace Theory. The Democratic Peace Theory is probably the most popular theme or theory in trying to understand what causes war and what causes peace.

Read More
1546 Words | 7 Pages

Enlightenment, according to Kant, is a progressive process makes people to get rid of the self-imposed immaturity. The character of immaturity is the “lack of resolve and courage to use their own understating without guidance from others”. Kant believes two things that can make people immaturity are: laziness and cowardice. They make majorities in the society don’t event to try to become maturity. To Kant, freedom plays an important role to save people from immaturity.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

The argument being proposed in this essay is that the United States Security Council and the International Criminal Court should be merged into one large international organization due to the inefficiency of the International Criminal Court and the abilities it would gain if it were to be merged with the United Nations Security Council. The International Criminal Court is an expensive organization that has produced arguably no results, and it gains all its cases from the United Nations Security Council anyways. Joining together would make the process of catching these criminals much more efficient, as they would gain support from larger nations in the UN such as the United States, who have been critical towards the ICC. Although recently it has looked like the ICC is starting to make progress, the fact of the matter is that the organization can basically only point fingers and call names. Without the supervision from the United Nations Security Council, the ICC would be absolutely useless in bringing justice to these criminals and their nations that have been harmed through their

Read More

More about Why Is The Iraq War A Behemoth Of An Institution

Related Topics

Open Document