Why The Book Should Not Be Banned In Schools

795 Words4 Pages

Free Our Books

How would you feel if your favorite book was banned from your school? Books should not be banned because of books like To Kill A Mockingbird teach important lessons. These books help students comprehend history and see another side of a story. Sometimes people misunderstand the meaning of a book because of its words and not the content of the book. Books should not be banned because they teach important lessons, they help get an understanding of history, and lastly, the books are not the problem.
Books teach different, important lessons to students in schools. As Niccolini states, “Nothing sparks more interest in a book than mentioning it’s been banned, which is part of what Emerson means when he quips that “every burned book enlightens the world. In addition to giving space to celebrate freedom of expression and our …show more content…

As stated in Procon.org “Books look at the topics, the concerns, the worry, the fascination that kids have today... It's the world in which they're living. Many books that have long been considered to be required reading to become educated about literature and American history are frequently challenged,” (1). This quote is saying that books are not the problem but the way people interpret them is making them seem bad.This is important because if people looked more at the content of a book rather than the words used in the book, maybe something would be different. Another example would be “Your personal beliefs dictate your level of offense or comfort with the previous terms”( Schneider 326).This quote is saying that because of the words in the book it clouds people judgment of the book. It is important because many of the books were banned because the words in the book and many people probably didn't read the book to understand it. In conclusion, the way people distinguish a book is the