ipl-logo

Why Was The Tank Essential For An Allied Power Victory In World War I?

3479 Words14 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impact of tanks in ww1

Yair Halpert World Jewish History 11: 112010-15 Dr. Tugendhaft 05/01/2023 Was the Tank Essential for an Allied Power Victory in World War I? World War I, also known as the Great War, was a devastating and disastrous conflict from 1914 to 1918. The war included many of the world’s most extraordinary powers, including the Allied Powers, also known as the Triple Entente, the U.S., Great Britain, and France, and the Central Powers which consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. The gruesome war led to the loss of many lives. The nature of warfare had changed significantly since the last wars, with many new technologies being created that would revolutionize the battlefields completely. One of the essential inventions was the tank, a …show more content…

Infantry troops were vulnerable to machine-gun fire and artillery, and tanks were used to provide cover and suppress enemy fire. Tanks could advance behind the infantry, and their firepower could be used to eliminate enemy strongholds and fortified positions. Tanks were equipped with machine guns and cannons, and their mobility and armor made them ideal for providing close support to infantry troops. The breakthrough operations were perhaps when tanks made the most of their impact in World War One. Infantry units were able to advance and take over territory by penetrating enemy positions with the help of tanks. To produce a coordinated onslaught, tanks were frequently utilized together with artillery and air support. The ultimate victory of the Allied powers was made possible by the use of tanks in breakthrough …show more content…

The M1 Abrams tank, which was heavily armored and supplied with cutting-edge equipment for weapons and electronics, was used by the US Army. They were successful in engaging, disabling, and aiding ground operations with fire. They had to change their strategies and use new defenses because they were vulnerable to modern anti-tank weapons and clever bombs. Tanks played a crucial role in the Allied victory in the Gulf War despite these difficulties. Generally speaking, the success rate of tanks in warfare has fluctuated depending on the circumstances and the available technology. Although they have been criticized and faced challenges, tanks have remained an essential part of modern warfare and have sophisticated and increased over time. Tanks have been utilized in a variety of operations, such as puncturing enemy defenses, growing infantry, engaging enemy armor, and supporting fire. Tanks continue to play an essential part in military operations across the world and have influenced the strategy and tactics of modern

Show More
Related
1461 Words | 6 Pages

This includes: tanks, aircraft and artilleries. This is how the campaign of Kokoda track was fought. The popular large formation sweeping the emeries aside with heroic bayonet charges was far from now it was for the average

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

The tank is most definitely the most important item invented during WW1. During trench warfare, both sides were usually locked in place, with limited advancements from either side. If troops dared leave

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

The article “Military Developments of World War I” by David T. Zabecki focuses on the developments in strategy, tactics, and doctrine in warfare by all parties during World War I between 1914 and 1918 as a result of the evolution of military technology during said years. David Zabecki delivers an expository piece that aims to convince the general population that World War I due to the immense prevalence of World War II in the public eye as the origin of modern warfare. Despite the matter-of-fact nature of the text, the informative structure is riddled with subtle rhetorical devices that seek to convince the reader that World War I was, indeed, the origin of modern warfare due to developments in military strategy, tactics, doctrine, technology,

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

The British had concealed their facilities from Axis pilots, covering factories to look like empty fields and putting up dummy tanks in empty landscapes. These tanks could be constructed out of balloons, paper, or other material, all painted to give the illusion of large numbers of land units. This was not the first time someone from either side had used dummy tanks. Dummy tanks have a history dating back to World War 1 and the introduction of tanks in modern warfare. Both sides used them to throw off the enemy’s air attacks, hoping they would waste bombs and ammunition on empty fields.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Title Artillery in WWI was devastating even outmatching the early tanks they had multiple types of artillery, which all had their perks. they were all killing machines in their own right and they were all rulers WWI. they were all hindered by the trenches pretty much needing direct hit to do anything to the enemy. yet they were still most effective killing machines in world war 1. light guns weren't as powerful as heavy or howitzer artillery they only shot 4 to 6 pound shells of ammunition.

Read More
1900 Words | 8 Pages

M4 Sherman Designed after the defeat of the french army the United States engineers this tank transforms into a bulldozer tank but by far this was not the best tank in WW2. M4A4 Sherman

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

This is because the tanks could move over the trenches and into enemy territory; This prevented enemy forces from inflicting damage to the tanks. Most primary sources state that the tank could simply roll over the trenches and inflict significant damage upon the enemy forces. This machine majorly contributed many significant battles such as the battle of Amens by exposing its capabilities and significance to the war effort thus proving its worth as part of an all arms

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

No one can deny that General George S. Patton was a brilliant military tactician who revolutionized tank warfare during World War II. He helped co invent the co-axial tank mount for canons and machine guns. His high standards, discipline, toughness, and pride within his units where legendary, and his action and temper led to many controversies during his career. His men gave him the nickname “Old Blood-and-Guts." These distinctions have made him one of the most influences military figures in world history.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

Marc, Overall your paper is informative in nature and provides some strong information on the history of tanks in warfare. You did a great job pointing out that the Germans used new tactics during the blitzkrieg compared to the Allies. You should have developed this with more detail to describe the Germans tactics. Explain the way tanks were used to “punch” a hole in weaker defenses while avoiding stronger defensive positions. Thus, quickly overrunning an Allies position allowing the Germans tanks and forces access behind the Allis front line and encircling the stronger positions.

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

The 100th Infantry Division personnel faced all types of attacks ranging from artillery barrage; German 88mm tank rounds and potato mashers (German Hand grenades). The German tanks were called the Hunting Tiger (Jagdtiger) tank which had 128mm main cannon. This tank was known to the U.S tank crews as the Tank Destroyer because of its cannon, plus the fact that the armor was 250mm thick which made it difficult to penetrate. The fact that it was a fixed turret made it vulnerable to side or attacks from the

Read More
2196 Words | 9 Pages

According to historian Steven J. Zaloga, the M4 Sherman tank was "one of the most effective tanks of World War II," with its 75mm main gun and lower profile making it better suited for the hilly terrain of Western Europe. In his article "The M4 Sherman Tank: The Best Design of the War?," Zaloga notes that "the design emphasis [of the M4 Sherman] was not on firepower, but rather on cross-country mobility, reliability, and ease of manufacture. " The US Army also employed effective strategies in the use of tanks, such as the "tank destroyer doctrine," which utilized specialized vehicles to ambush and destroy enemy tanks. Zaloga's book Armored Thunderbolt: The US Army Sherman in World War II provides detailed information on the development and deployment of the M4 Sherman, highlighting the tank's ability to adapt to changing battlefield conditions and its role in the eventual Allied victory.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

Through non-conventional warfare such as the guerrilla tactics employed by the VC, it made it harder for the US forces to call in air power to bombard the VC forces as they fought very closely against the US and thus, rendered the US air power advantage

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

Tanks were a great counter for trench warfare because they could drive over them while shooting down into the trenches. The first tanks went only four miles per hour at top speed but were effective on the battlefield. The tank had heavy weapons and heavy armor. As time and technology progressed tanks’ engines were becoming stronger and faster. A major problem with tanks is that one third of them would not even start.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

I. New weapons made for the war were stronger and more complex than ever before. The weapons were

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

He declared that his Soldiers must win at all costs and according to Harvey (2008), “100 tanks moved forward the following day and encircled 150,000 Germans, who admittedly, were not putting up much resistance” (p. 347). Patton finally found the recognition he desired. Moreover, he established himself as a writer of tank warfare and excellent

Read More

More about Why Was The Tank Essential For An Allied Power Victory In World War I?

Related Topics

Open Document