When whistleblowers report a potential problem, some people may see that their actions are not reporting for the greater good of society, but rather a release of secrets. If an employee does something against company policy that they thought was right and gets fired, this could cause the SEC to get involved because they can prove that the displaced employee is a whistleblower. Employers do not want someone who is going to freely release information and call themselves a whistleblower. To discuss this problem, Catherine Fotl (2013, n.d), in her online article: Employers beware: Will the SEC be A Safety Net for Terminated Whistleblowers? That change will come for the SEC enforcement abilities and states that companies need to be vigilant in their actions against security violations. Furthermore, companies are at risk of being sued in legal consequences if they reason that terminating that person, or retaliation, is better for the company, which could then hurt their reputation as a company. Companies need to be able to fire individuals who violate policies, code, and law. The fact that some of these individuals can claim being a whistleblower will protect them is unfair to many companies. For example, if an individual releases …show more content…
These laws have been developed since the beginning of our country’s creation to assist. These are just some of the many laws that protect whistleblowers from possible outcomes that could harm or affect one’s life. Without these whistleblowing laws, would prove not possible and even more dangerous to