Winston Churchill, on behalf of peace and security of the whole world, arranges a speech in which he argues that the United States and Britain must collaborate and mobilize their forces in preparation to resist the military assaults of Nazi Germany and its allies. The speaker emphasizes the cooperation between two nations, reassuring that this military act is reasonable and appropriate. In order to better persuade his audience, he uses a number of rhetorical questions, vocabularies and phrases that highlight his specific points and appeal to people’s emotion as well as reiteration to reinforce his argument. As stated, the author uses rhetorical questions, which are virtually ubiquitous within the writing. He states ‘Has any benefit or progress ever been achieved by the human race by submission to organized and calculated violence?’ to initiate one paragraph. This question is strongly intended to be answered ‘No’, since he is consistently refuses submission to the Nazis, which alludes to ‘organized and calculated violence.’ As seen in the following sentence, he clarifies that glory has always been founded upon the spirit of resistance to tyranny and injustice: …show more content…
To elucidate Nazis’ brutality, he juxtaposes them with the phrase ‘Like the communists’ and reiterates it several time. This reiteration moreover exhibits his hatred against communists, which he describes as ‘they must seek, at shorter intervals, a new target, a new prize, a new victim’. Moreover, it strengthens his persuasive argument that they should resist to the threatening power of Nazis. In a nutshell, the speaker demonstrates a variety of elements and skills to successfully persuade his audience. He build his claim by rhetorical questioning, expressions intended to be appealing and persuasive, and lastly reiteration of same phrase for refined impact on