Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History and growth of journalism essay
Essay on role of women in politics
The concept of women in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to Ellen Carol DuBois in "American History thru Women's Eyes", life for women varied in late 1800s, because they were so diverse and they faced different challenges such as discrimination based on ethnicity, economic challenges, and also poverty. A woman's life experience also varied based on the reasoning why the family or the woman chose to move to the west. Life as a native woman, as a woman settling "family west" and a woman settling "wild west" differed. DuBois referenced these two types of processes in which western land was to be consolidated as a part of the American nation. The "wild west" and the "family west" (DuBois, page 346).
In the year 1979, Chicago Tribune writer Mary Elson surprised Jack Bradley at work. He gave her a ten-minute interview. He was talking about how he regrets that there was a flag attached to the pipe he put in the ground. She completely misunderstood what he was talking about, but James Bradley believed it captures the plainness of the moment of the flag raising in contrast to the public's grand perception of it.
In the early 1970s the Watergate Scandal rocked America and eventually led to the resignation of Richard Nixon. The Washington Post assigned reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein to the incident, and through their investigative journalism, they traced the Watergate break-in back to Nixon. All the President’s Men showcases Woodward and Bernstein’s investigation of Watergate, whereas in The Final Days Woodward and Bernstein tell the story of the last days of the Nixon presidency. In All the President’s Men and The Final Days, Woodward and Bernstein use third person omniscient narration to show the investigation of the media and the lack of morality of the Nixon administration.
Clare Booth Luce in her speech during the second world war to the women's banking committee, promotes women to make sacrifices during the war effort. This specific situation is unique, as Luce is a woman in war, giving a speech to women in war. Throughout the piece, she uses pathos to connect with her audience on a personal level. She does this by first bringing herself to the level of the woman in the audience, who are most likely financially stable since they are on the banking committee. Next, she brings herself to the level of all women in the United States, and finally to everyone in the United States.
Following the American Revolution and the separation from Britain, the main group that seemed to “hold all the power” were men, mostly white, of property. Many other groups during this time did not hold the same amount of power as the men. Women, in particular, suffered in terms of rights during and after the American Revolution. Between how women were to be seen in the eye of the public and their place in politics, women had very little rights.
The speech given at Womens National Press Club in 1960 by Clare Boothe Luce was a strong argument by the statements made. She shows ethos and logical appeal to her audience by condemning her argument to her audience. Luce slows starts by setting up her audience where she goes on to criticize the tendency of the American press to give up journalist integrity. She also engages the fact to her audience that she is there to give her speech because the journalist invited her to speak. Luce is first very aware that by delivering her speech she is most likely to be criticized by her audience.
In the speech “The Man with the Muck-rake” presented by Theodore Roosevelt the topics of investigative journalism, and speaking the truth are discussed. His point was made through a variety of rhetorical techniques including the use of analogy, anaphora, and ethos. The use of these three devices allowed him to convince the audience that investigative journalism, if done by lying, is one of the worst possible evils. When starting the speech Roosevelt compared the present (1906) to the time of George Washington in the late 18th century. His use of analogy illustrates the similarities and differences between the two times, this allows the audience to understand that the problems that exist now have been overcome before.
When Nellie Bly went looking for a job, “no wanted to hire a female as a reporter,” therefore, she “devised the idea of getting herself admitted to New York’s insane asylum… and earned a permanent post at the World,” (“Elizabeth Cochrane Seaman”). Even when no male wanted to hire her for being female, Bly proves that a distinguished writer is not determined by gender, but by the risks and techniques they take when writing a story. In the insane asylum, Nellie Bly exposed the malpractices the medical team performed while she was there, and this caught the attention of the World newspaper company. The daring risks Bly took proved to male reporters that women are capable of taking on dangerous risks to capture an engaging story for the public. When she took a trip to Mexico to write about the living conditions there, “she almost got herself arrested,” but “Bly’s willingness to take personal risks… inaugurated a new kind of celebrity journalism,” (“Breaking Down Barriers”).
Even though Luce will be telling them what they do wrong, Luce lets them know that they understand what to do and that it is very difficult, they just have not learned but she will teach them. Also, Luce states that “if there is much that is wrong with the American press, there is also much that is right with it.” When saying this, Luce lets the audience know that although there are things that they are doing wrong, there are also things that they are doing right. By saying this, Luce gives the audience a dose of confidence before going into her speech and
American Women in the Late 1800’s Were married American women in the late 1800’s expected to restrict their sphere of interest to the home and the family? In the late 1800’s women were second-class citizens. Women were expected to limit their interest to the home and family. Women were not encouraged to obtain a real education or pursue a professional career. After marriage, women did not have the right to own their own property, keep their own wages, or sign a contract.
American journalist and politician, Clare Luce prepares her audience made up of their journalists for a speech sh needs them to understand was done in her duty for the pursuit of truth. Luce relates her journalistic views and duty to allow them to understand why she needs to go against the norm. INTRO. It is asked “what is good journalism all about?”
The former nature article writer experiences first-hand the deception and manipulation that goes in to writing a front page worthy piece. The journalists in Ishmaelia do not seem very surprised when Shumble, a fellow reporter in Ishmaelia, sends out an untruthful story. In fact, Corker tells Boot not to deny the report, saying “Risky, old boy, and unprofessional. It’s the kind of thing you can do once or twice in a real emergency but it doesn’t pay.”
This is evident through the perspective of which Oprah conveys to the audience, stating rather that such issues “transcend any culture, geography, race, religion. Politics or workplace.” Thus, such ideas that Oprah explores are not limited to the confides of the film industry, and as such her speech stands as a reflection to all issues and controversies regarding global and societal mistreatment and discrimination. Oprah further emphasizes the struggles to which most women must endure so as to speak out against such controversies, with her main, yet subtle, critique directed towards the scrutiny of the mud-slinging Fake News campaign. Oprah simply states that “we all know the press is under siege these days.”
Luce is not denigrating, but supporting the journalists in order to prevent them from becoming too defensive. Additionally, she states in the following sentence that she is putting forth an effort to tell the truth in her speech and “begin[s] by saying that if there is much...wrong with the American Press, there is also much right with it.” The counterargument is introduced here, explaining that the American Press is not only bad, but also has good qualities, which may ameliorate the faults she adverts to and the improvements she
On November 13th, 1969, Spiro Agnew, who was the Vice President at the time, gave the speech, Television News Coverage, about how news producers are becoming too powerful (Bibliography.com.) To successfully inform his audience, he uses many rhetorical strategies to keep everyone engaged and attentive. Agnew delivered an exceptional speech by using multiple techniques such as analogies, anaphoras, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to justify this problem to his audience. To help his audience understand what is being addressed, Agnew uses analogies to connect his ideas to familiar objects.