Andrea Yates Essays

element of the Andrea Yates story - do you feel/not feel sympathetic toward Andrea? Why or why not? In your opinion what does her personal/home life look like? Do you perceive her as healthy/insane? I feel a little bit of sympathy towards Andrea Yates, but not so much. The reason is because although Andrea did have mental problems which must have been hard to deal with while taking care of kids I do still believe she was still fully capable of understanding that her actions were wrong. Andrea lived a normal

When comparing rational choice theory to the Andrea Yates story it is evident that rational theory was in fact present throughout the duration of Andrea completing her heinous crime. According to the document provided via Investopedia, the rational theory could be defined as “... an economic principle that states that individuals always make prudent and logical decisions.” Throughout the case and its entirety, Andrea depicted characteristics of being fully rational and aware of her decisions. Several

On June 20th, 2001, Andrea Yates killed her five young children Noah, John, Paul, Luke, and Mary in the bathtub of the family’s home in Houston, Texas. The family was Caucasian, and at the time of the crime, Noah was 7, John was 5, Paul was 3, Luke was 2, Mary was 6 months, and Yates was 36. Yates’s husband Russell “Rusty” Yates was at work at the time of the crime. Yates killed her children as a result of her post-partum psychosis and other mental illnesses that had been developing throughout her

full of many things we will never understand. Andreas Yates was diagnosed with mental illness two years before she drown her children in the tub. Yes, that is an absolutely awful thing to do to your children. But no, she is not the complete monster. In my opinion the mental health system failed Ms. Yates. I would say once someone is diagnosed with a mental illness and already try to commit suicide after her 1st birth, should of have been assessed. Ms. Yates had passed severe postpartum depression and

On June 20, 2001, A woman named Andrea Yates drowned and killed her own five kids in her bathtub. Andrea Yates was married to Russel Yates, and together they had five kids between the ages of six months to seven years old. When the news came out about what happened, the population was horrified and outraged. The Andrea Yates case can be explained but not justified, by looking at what happened, the things that led up to the crime and the convictions. On the morning of June 20th, 2001, in Houston Texas

Andrea Yates was born on July 2, 1964 in Houston, Texas. She was the youngest of five children and grew up in a Catholic household. She graduated from Milby High School in 1982. Yates was involved in many extracurricular activities including the swim team and the National Honor Society. Yates had a seemingly typical childhood and life thereafter that. After high school she continued her education at the University of Houston. She was enrolled in a pre-nursing program and later went on to graduate

unsuccessfully tried to end her own life afterward. However, one of the most well-known cases of filicide would be the case of Andrea Yates. Many that knew Andrea Yates were stunned to learn that she drowned all five of her children in a bathtub located inside her house. Before Andrea Yates

Many people may think of Andrea Yates as the disgraceful mother who murdered all 5 of her children. Also many people do not know that she was severely ill. In fact she was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to life, but a court of appeals reversed the conviction and found her insane. She was diagnosed postpartum depression and psychosis. For the people who do know what postpartum depression mean is that each time she gave birth she got more depressed due to hormone change or fatigue

Insanity of Andrea Yates Andrea Yates was born in Houston Texas on July 2, 1964 and her name was Andrea Pia Kennedy. She did well in school and was even class valedictorian. In 1993 she married preacher disciple of Michael Peter Woroniecki, Rusty Yates, and the Yates family was often criticized by Woroniecki and were told their children would go to hell. In 1999 Yates suffered from several family passed mental illnesses including postpartum depression and psychosis. When her 5th child was born

Katherine Jaros Dr. Ann Burgess FORS5317.01 4/19/2023 Understanding Andrea Yates: Mental Health and its Relationship to Violent Crime INTRODUCTION Mental health in criminal offenders is a highly complex and controversial issue that plays a critical role in determining how we understand and evaluate violent crimes. A significant number of offenders who commit violent crimes have some form of mental illness or disorder, which drives interest in studying such cases. Furthermore, during the

found Mrs. Yates not guilty by reason of insanity” (Resnik 8). This shows that it got harder for them to decide, and they found her not guilty. The defense team for Andrea Yates was very strong and this is how she was able to get off on being not guilty. It was a long fight that lasted over five years. This was a long case and they believed Dr. Dietz who was a professional doctor for mental patients, he played a big role in persuading the jury with what he believed was wrong with Mrs. Yates. He played

committed a brutal crime, but is it fair to claim someone as “insane” or “mentally ill”, rather than putting them behind bars and calling them a criminal like the rest of them? The first time I heard about the insanity plea was in the Andrea Yates case back in 2001. Yates was class valedictorian when she was in high school with a good background.

commit. Andrea Yates mental stability and religious views altered her ability of life and caused five young children to lose their lives

mother of five. Andrea Yates had drowned all five of her young children in the bathtub of their home. Yates called the authorities and her husband Rusty Yates to the home, where she confessed to killing her children. According to Faith McLellan of the Lancet Medical Journal, Andrea Yates’s bizarre reasoning behind this horrific act was because she believed to have been marked by Satan, and that in order to save her children from hell she needed to take their lives (McLellan, 2006). Yates pleaded not

Andrea Yates: A Look into Postpartum Psychosis Emily Hughes Missouri Valley College If you ask most mothers if they have ever thought of hurting their children, most all would answer with a stern no. Most people do not think it is possible to harm their children. It was a midmorning on June 20st 2001 in Houston when an eerily calm woman phoned 911 to come to her home. No one was prepared for the horror that was behind the doors to this modest brick home. Andrea Yates mother

Through the perspectives of sociological criminology and psychiatric criminology, Andrea Yates crimes will be thoroughly explained. In 2002, she was initially charged and found guilty in the death of three her children; the crown did not try her on all five counts (Lezon, 2006, para. 3). In 2006, a jury in an appellate court the initial decision was reversed and Yates was not guilty by reason of insanity (CNN Library, 2016, para 1). Sociological criminology analyzes factors that include: race, gender

In our society killing one’s own child would be looked at as a horrific act. The bond between a mother and child should be unbreakable. What could possibly motivate someone to do something so terrible to his or her child? In the case of Andrea Yates there were multiple factors, including her mental health, which ultimately caused her to take the lives of her children. Infanticide, which is killing one’s own child, has not always been regarded as an act of horror, even in the U.S. There are numerous

Through the perspectives of sociological criminology and psychiatric criminology, Andrea Yates crimes will be thoroughly explained. In 2002, she was initially charged and found guilty in the death of three her children; the crown did not try her on all five counts (Lezon, 2006, para. 3). In 2006, a jury in an appellate court the initial decision was reversed and Yates was not guilty by reason of insanity (CNN Library, 2016, para 1). Sociological criminology analyzes factors that include: race, gender

What was behind the tragedy in the Yates household? I believe that we can look to Freuds theory on psychology, the psychodynamic perspective for the answer. Freuds theory explains that the mind is like an iceberg. That only a small piece of it is visually observable that being behavior. Andrea Yates appeared to be a perfectly normal woman. However, it is completely unknown what her deeper psyche held. Freud explained that his theory is based on a yin and yang partnership. Meaning for one to be

The case of Andrea Yates is an uncommon case for people who made such a crime; she was guilty of drowning her five children one at time. She actually had a good life, a successful husband who worked in NASA, living in a bus then in a house raising her children’s, her goal was to be a successful mother, and she was actually a perfectionist in high school; going to nursery school studying, taking care of kids, etc. I believe that the causes of Andrea Yates’ murder of her children were mental problems