Keystone Pipeline Essays

Keystone Pipeline How would the Keystone Pipeline help the country through the U.S's economic strain? The Keystone pipeline could prove to play a major role in the survival of the United States. With tensions high in the Middle East and Russia; there is a need for another oil supply should the supply be depleted or withheld. The U.S imports nearly 80% of its oil from foreign countries. This means if these countries were to turn their backs on the U.S, the U.S would be left with 20% of our oil needs

In recent years in can be noted that civil disobedience is prominent in American culture. This can be portrayed in the recent events of the Keystone Pipeline activists. Many activists have blamed the government for their problems just as Thoreau did in his essay “Civil Disobedience”. There can be a parallel drawn between these two topics even though they have decades between them. In these times it is still logical to believe that civil disobedience is the right course of action. Activists, wanting

The Keystone Pipeline System has been a major source of crude oil import for the U.S. in recent years. According to The New York Times, the Keystone alone supplies about a half million barrels of oil per day, which is almost a quarter of the total amount that Canada sends; Canada is the largest exporter of crude oil to the United States, supplying over 2 million barrels every day (Kraus; Keystone 293). The Keystone XL is one of the extension projects to boost the output of the existing system by

1. The title of the article is “On the Keystone Pipeline, President Obama Missed an Opportunity” the article was published November 11, 2015 at 12:31 pm by Greg IP. 2. In the article, “On the Keystone Pipeline, President Obama Missed an Opportunity”, it is discussing President Obama’s decision on vetoing the Keystone XL Pipeline and the thought process behind it. In a recent statement President Obama explained his reason for vetoing the pipeline by stating that in order to prevent the climate from

half on the topic of oil pipelines. Some believe that oil pipelines, such as the Keystone XL and the Bakken Pipeline will be the first step to isolating ourselves from depending on outside threats for resources. Others believe that oil pipelines have the ability to contaminate the world, not only through water and climate, but also through the economy. The public needs to be informed about what really goes on behind the scenes, what the fate is of towns that have oil pipelines running through them,

Introduction (Hook…. need to think this through better) The Keystone Pipeline has been debated for sometime now. Why is it so controversial? Many worry that it will intrude on property rights, while others believe that it will be a danger to the environment. Others believe that it’ll benefit the economy and will not have major impact on the environment. There is a lot of background information about the Keystone as well that it has an environmental and economic impacts. Body Main Point: (description

Introduction The Keystone Pipeline was a proposed idea of a pipeline that would run from the oil sands of Canada to Steele City, Nebraska. It would then connect to an existing pipeline that would administer it elsewhere. Since it is an oil pipeline that would cross international borders, it needed the President’s approval. The idea became such a controversial topic when President Obama stated that six days to decide the fate of this project was not a sufficient amount of time to make a decision

existing Keystone Pipeline. This project was known as the Keystone XL pipeline. The Keystone XL pipeline proposal was estimated at almost seven billion dollars and would transport tar sands from Alberta down to Nebraska with a second portion in Oklahoma traveling to the Gulf Coast. Although the Keystone XL Pipeline has been rejected by the President of the United States, there are those who still are in favor for the expansion despite the risks and dangers from the current pipelines. Some of

an economically strong country is to reopen the Keystone pipeline and also allow states to have the power to generate their own oil. The opposition believes that pipelines have posed a huge risk to wildlife and the surrounding environment. The Key Stone pipeline has too many hurdles to go through; therefore, wildlife activists are against this project. President Joe Biden’s pipeline halt angered Canada because Canadians are not getting oil (“Pipelines’’). The world needs more Canadian oil. There are

The Keystone Pipeline is a series of metal pipes that run from Alberta Canada to Patoka, Illinois and Port Arthur, Texas. The pipes pass through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. The current Keystone Pipeline transports approximately 700,000 barrels of oil a day from Canada to Texas. (n.d.) The Keystone XL Pipeline is a proposed 1,700 mile expansion to the current pipeline, which would branch west, impacting an additional state, Montana, and end in Cushing Oklahoma

ownership of land, and forget to appreciate the simple beauty of the land. One topic that seems to demonstrate this concept is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone is an infrastructure that has caused citizens and TransCanada to fight over land. The Keystone XL Pipeline is used to transport tar sands from Alberta, Canada, to the eastern coastal region of Texas. Much of the pipeline has already been constructed, but there is one more phase of TransCanada’s project that has been proposed but hasn’t been

environmental groups, the Keystone Pipeline, Clinton suspiciously gave a vague answer when asked her opinion on the conflict. The issue is whether the pipeline, which would transport raw tar sands oil from Canada to Texas, should be built or not. To the environmental groups this is a big deal, because the pipeline is an unconventional energy source requiring far more fuel, water and carbon emissions to extract than conventional oil and gas. Pros of the Keystone Pipeline would be its ability to create

The Keystone XL Pipeline Annotated Bibliography Biello, David. “Green Goo.” Scientific American. Jul. 2013. Vol. 309(1). Web. 4 Apr. 2015. In Biello opinions of climate change dramatic cost for the Keystone XL, he shows that fifteen scientists gather and sign a letter to the President persuading him to decline the proposal about the Keystone pipeline. The evidence that this proposal would not be beneficial was shown in Biello’s article. Climatologists advise burning of fossil fuels will adversely

the Keystone Pipeline project was proposed and commissioned by TransCanada. Essentially, this is a pipeline that transports oil sands bitumen across the Canada-US border and into several different reserves in the States. An additional extension to the Keystone Pipeline, the Keystone XL Pipeline, has also been proposed. Several issues arise when considering the consequences of this new proposal, including the potential for oil spills and habitat damage. However, while the Keystone XL Pipeline does

recent conflicts is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The pipeline is essentially the fourth step of the Keystone Pipeline System. It’s going to be used to transport oil to the United States from Canada. This topic is highly controversial because of the negative impacts it causes on the environment, the political issues, and economic benefits. According to “The Keystone XL Pipeline: Improper Reliance on Weak Conservation Measures for Endangered

The keystone pipeline has created great debate among the government of the United States and Native American’s living close to where it would be. There have been several attempts by the counter parts to convince the general public what to do. An example of these are the “Reject and Protect” Cowboy and Indian Alliance Anti-Pipeline Ad and the Support Keystone Pro-Pipeline Ad. The Anti-pipeline add starts with images of the Native American’s and Cowboys together. In the background we can hear Native

created a Keystone pipeline to deliver this oil from one country to the next. Over the years a new proposition came along to build another pipeline called the Keystone pipeline XL for an even more efficient way to deliver oil. With this new idea, a giant controversy was born. The dynamic controversy between the two sides of the Keystone pipeline being created in Canada has sparked arguments across Canada about the pros and cons of this project. To start with the pros of

controversial projects for the United States to decide on was whether or not to build the Keystone pipeline. This topic forces the government to decide if economic development is worth the cost of endangering the environment. Though this pipeline will allow the United States to rely less on foreign oil, the pipeline’s lasting effects prove to be a factor that cannot be easily overlooked. The Keystone pipeline should not be built because it endangers the environment and has the ability to create catastrophic

The United States should not support the North Dakota and Keystone Pipeline The North Dakota and Keystone pipeline is a Canadian and U.S pipeline that runs from western Canada to the southern part of the U.S. The pipeline is currently owned by TransCanada Corporation. Its construction began in the in 1980s and is continuing to be built. For some time now, there have been many contradictions on the North Dakota pipeline construction. Many U.S. citizens think it is a great idea because it can provide

Keystone XL Pipeline Chances are the crude that traveled through the Keystone XL Pipeline, or a similar pipeline might be in our gas tanks. The Keystone XL Pipeline is a hotly contested pipeline that transports heavy crude from the tar sands of Alberta to American refineries in the Midwest or Gulf of Mexico to be used domestically or to be exported. (Domm par.3). The Keystone XL Pipeline needs to be constructed to help the United States wean off the use of foreign oil, have a minimal environmental