Napster Essays

revolutionary company in 1999 called Napster. Let’s just say, Napster blew the rest of the sound and music industry out of the water. Shawn Fanning spent over 60 hours on his computer in order to unlock his idea in the future of file sharing. He wanted to make an accessible and easy way for people to share their love of music at the click of their cursor. According to “A Brief History of Napster”

uncontrollable. One such event was the creation of Napster. Taking place in 1998 on the campus of North Eastern University, code creator Shawn Fanning teamed up with entrepreneur Sean Parker and together they changed how the world listens to music by launching Napster in 1999 (Haberman, 2014). Previously, when a consumer wanted a single song they would travel to their local record store and purchase a compact disk. By file-sharing on Napster, not only could they choose individual songs from albums

Napster, or file sharing, has taken the computer and recording industry by storm. The process of "sharing" music files over the Internet is not actually stealing copyrighted music, but the artists are getting upset with Napster because they feel that it is decreasing their profits. The music industry needs to find out how to profit from file sharing. Napster allows people to share their music with the world through their computers. So in theory, file sharing should destroy record sales. However,

would have to purchase the whole CD and spend $15-20 to get the one song they liked. With the advent of Napster that all changed. Napster was among one of the first online music streaming companies that allowed consumers to download songs one at a time and for free. Thus allowing consumers to obtain the individual songs they liked, instead of paying for an entire CD of songs they did not. Napster was shut down in early 2000 due to copyright infringement. According to an article published in the journal

Arguments, favors and oppositions Since Napster emerged, music sales in the U.S. have dropped 47 percent(RIAA,n.d.). However, Napster or any other music piracy is not to blame. In fact, music industry in 1980s and 90s was over-inflated(Swanson,2013). Artists receive a percentage of the music sales, and it is mostly between 12 and 14%(if you are a superstar, it can be 20%), after the deductions the retailer, the record company and the songwriter. As a matter of fact, artist can only make money after

understand how the internet functions, free online music streaming change the way people purchase and listen to music. It all started with the creation of Napster, the first music streaming site, where users could select songs to create their own playlist instead of random selected radio music. However, due to the major impact on music industries, Napster was shut down in February of 2001 for illegal downloading, which violated the legal copyrights owned by music companies. Similar to downloading movies

piracy became prevalent in June 1999 with the release of Napster which enabled its nearly 80 million users to file share MP3s and has since has been a part of the debate, “is digital piracy hurting the music industry?” Since the age of 11, I have listened to music on cassettes and even spent time recording music from the radio. By the early 2000’s, CDs had changed the devices we used for music and with that, came a new way to acquire music. Napster was the first file sharing program made available and

Case Study 1. Identify the situation, and the basic issues presented. • Three friends from Ohio State University formed a company called Phusion Projects, LLC. The company produced Four Loko, an alcoholic/caffeinated beverage that quickly became a favorite drink of college students in the United States. This drink targeted college students who grew up with energy drinks. • This beverage was referred to as an energy drink that contained caffeine and 12 percent alcohol. • Four Loko caused people

According to the documentary, When America was Rocked, Elvis Presley was a rock ‘n’ roll teenage icon in the 1950’s. When he was signed for The Ed Sullivan Show, in September of 1956, fans all over were aroused. The Ed Sullivan Show was one of the most prestigious and popular shows in the 1950’s. Elvis Presley’s appearance on this show bolstered ratings and represented a huge moment in American Pop Culture history because of the influence of teenage consumerism, the mass impact of television, and

Nothing is Left Behind The article “Bootleg music downloading a thing of the past? Not so, study says” reports on the not so abandoned bootlegging. It gives factual evidence to show how bootlegging is still in the present. Deleting a website for bootleg music downloading, did not decrease or stop the illegal downloads. There just seems to be another site to be deleted. However, legal websites like Pandora and Spotify did decrease the illegal downloads, but did not stop them. A majority would agree

been established. Napster Developed by programmers Sean Fanning and Sean Parker in 1999, Napster was a website that used peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing to allowed users to trade copyrighted music files stored on Napster’s servers without any payment necessary. P2P networks enable computers to connect directly to each other and utilize specialized

intellectual property infringement. A&M Records, Inc. v Napster Inc. addresses the issue of copyright infringement in regards to peer to peer file sharing. Does this program constitute fair use? And how does this case affect the future of file sharing and the music industry? In this paper, I will be examining the effect of illegal peer-to-peer file sharing on the music industry and how this case has changed the way we buy and share music today. Napster was founded in 1999 by college student, Shawn Fanning

intuitive, and simple (Elliott, 2011). Product decision, challenge of timing, being an evangelist for your product were just some of the factors in the development of the product. 2) How did Jobs weigh in on the Napster controversy and turn it into a win for Apple? A) When weighing in on the Napster controversy, Jobs and his cohorts at Apple insisted that the issue of music piracy was fundamentally behavioral, not technological (Elliott, 2011). Jobs

therefore they are all liable under an agency theory. Likewise, under copy right law, Contributory liability for copyright infringement requires that the secondary infringer know or have reason to know of direct infringement. A &M Records Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) Does it matter that Keith’s intent was only to conceal his soft- rock proclivities and not the infringement?

infringers (Honigsberg, 2002). Metallica and Dr. Dre started to sue every single person who infringed their music. The better than expected sales of Radiohead’s album Kid A can be attributed to the premature release or “leakage” of the tracks on Napster. A study conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project surveyed 3,000 musicians and songwriters about their views about file sharing. Surprisingly, they found that 35% of the subjects agreed that file sharing was not necessarily bad because

consumers. Certain industries blame the availability of downloading music for ruining the music industry. In an article by Stephen Seigel, he claims that “music-sharing programs have reduced music to its purest form” (“Nipping at Napster”). Being able to receive free music from Napster, decreases the beauty of music since downloading does not come with the photos, as CDs do. This causes people to separate the actual meaning of the music from the package, which furthers people away from the artist’s message

college and instead follow his friend to San Francisco to invest all his time in the idea that was Napster. Napster was a music file sharing network which allowed people to download music from other people’s computers who were sharing them. “The service, which launched on June 1, 1999, soon spread like a virus, infecting every music nut with a computer and a dial-up connection. By March of 2000, Napster had 20 million users. Several months later, it was more than three times that.” (Suskind,

University in St. Louis. (2013, August 1). Case study: A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. Retrieved October 22, 2015 from https://onlinelaw.wustl.edu/blog/case-study-am-records-inc-v-napster-inc/ This case study describes from WU’s School of Law examines the case between Napster and A&M records where A&M brought a law suit against Napster for infringement on intellectual property rights. The case introduces us to Napster, a peer-to-peer file sharing platform that was designed for the purpose of sharing

without paying is stealing and hurts profits, complaints seem to originate most commonly from record labels and a handful of the larger artists such as Def Leppard and Taylor Swift rather than from every artist who has free music on sites like Napster. When Napster came out on the internet and began to develop success, only then were they targeted by the music industry: when their success became a threat. Ian mentions how she was bombarded with return emails. In her original article, she states that a

In this essay I am going to discuss the key issues surrounding copyright and why copyright is particularly important in today’s online age. Copyright is an exclusive legal right given to the creator of intellectual property for a fixed number of years. This means that the owners of the intellectual property are granted certain exclusive rights to intangible assets for example, music, literature, artwork, discoveries/inventions, symbols and designs (trademark). Copyright lasts for 70 years or for