Napster Essays

revolutionary company in 1999 called Napster. Let’s just say, Napster blew the rest of the sound and music industry out of the water. Shawn Fanning spent over 60 hours on his computer in order to unlock his idea in the future of file sharing. He wanted to make an accessible and easy way for people to share their love of music at the click of their cursor. According to “A Brief History of Napster”

uncontrollable. One such event was the creation of Napster. Taking place in 1998 on the campus of North Eastern University, code creator Shawn Fanning teamed up with entrepreneur Sean Parker and together they changed how the world listens to music by launching Napster in 1999 (Haberman, 2014). Previously, when a consumer wanted a single song they would travel to their local record store and purchase a compact disk. By file-sharing on Napster, not only could they choose individual songs from albums

Napster, or file sharing, has taken the computer and recording industry by storm. The process of "sharing" music files over the Internet is not actually stealing copyrighted music, but the artists are getting upset with Napster because they feel that it is decreasing their profits. The music industry needs to find out how to profit from file sharing. Napster allows people to share their music with the world through their computers. So in theory, file sharing should destroy record sales. However,

during the first iteration of the music distribution platform, Napster. As an area that is easily moulded by the demands of its consumers, Napster forever changed the music industry as it allowed people to download and share digital copies of music onto their computers for free. Undoubtedly, Napster was a major technological development in the consumption and distribution within the global music industry. Napster - the what, when and how Napster was an online

A&M RECORDS, Inc. v. NAPSTER, INC. A&M Records and Napster is a landmark intellectual property case that made it to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case refers to A&M Records as the plaintiff, but there are several other plaintiffs in this case. All members of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) are also the plaintiffs. A&M Records claimed that Napster could be held liable for contributory infringement and vicarious infringement of copyrights based

Since the introduction of the internet in the late 1990,s computer technology has grown quickly with it. Has the introduction of the internet and more recently fibre power broadband across the globe.is it really to blame for music piracy and killing the music industry Mat delete abstract INTRODUCTION Is music piracy all down to the introduction of the internet? Online piracy is made possible by file sharing; an exchange of data files from one computer to another via the internet. However, sharing

Arguments, favors and oppositions Since Napster emerged, music sales in the U.S. have dropped 47 percent(RIAA,n.d.). However, Napster or any other music piracy is not to blame. In fact, music industry in 1980s and 90s was over-inflated(Swanson,2013). Artists receive a percentage of the music sales, and it is mostly between 12 and 14%(if you are a superstar, it can be 20%), after the deductions the retailer, the record company and the songwriter. As a matter of fact, artist can only make money after

With the introduction of peer-to-peer file sharing sites such as Napster, Kazaa, and Limewire, the music industry has never been the same. In the beginning of the millennium many people had predicted that these file sharing sites would be the end and to some extent the new beginning of the music industry. Within the first few years these predictions were somewhat true. You have a business that for the last sixty plus years has had few changes, if any, now trying to scramble to keep up with today’s

would have to purchase the whole CD and spend $15-20 to get the one song they liked. With the advent of Napster that all changed. Napster was among one of the first online music streaming companies that allowed consumers to download songs one at a time and for free. Thus allowing consumers to obtain the individual songs they liked, instead of paying for an entire CD of songs they did not. Napster was shut down in early 2000 due to copyright infringement. According to an article published in the journal

understand how the internet functions, free online music streaming change the way people purchase and listen to music. It all started with the creation of Napster, the first music streaming site, where users could select songs to create their own playlist instead of random selected radio music. However, due to the major impact on music industries, Napster was shut down in February of 2001 for illegal downloading, which violated the legal copyrights owned by music companies. Similar to downloading movies

piracy became prevalent in June 1999 with the release of Napster which enabled its nearly 80 million users to file share MP3s and has since has been a part of the debate, “is digital piracy hurting the music industry?” Since the age of 11, I have listened to music on cassettes and even spent time recording music from the radio. By the early 2000’s, CDs had changed the devices we used for music and with that, came a new way to acquire music. Napster was the first file sharing program made available and

To understand how this phenomenon matters to the public, one must also recognize and identify the change occurred to the third party of this conversation: consumers. The development and commercialization of internet allowed people to freely download or upload music as digital file online. This act, also known as music piracy, created an option that allows consumers to listen to music other than purchasing artists’ albums. And when carrying this action out, consumers justify their action by criticizing

According to the documentary, When America was Rocked, Elvis Presley was a rock ‘n’ roll teenage icon in the 1950’s. When he was signed for The Ed Sullivan Show, in September of 1956, fans all over were aroused. The Ed Sullivan Show was one of the most prestigious and popular shows in the 1950’s. Elvis Presley’s appearance on this show bolstered ratings and represented a huge moment in American Pop Culture history because of the influence of teenage consumerism, the mass impact of television, and

Case Study 1. Identify the situation, and the basic issues presented. • Three friends from Ohio State University formed a company called Phusion Projects, LLC. The company produced Four Loko, an alcoholic/caffeinated beverage that quickly became a favorite drink of college students in the United States. This drink targeted college students who grew up with energy drinks. • This beverage was referred to as an energy drink that contained caffeine and 12 percent alcohol. • Four Loko caused people

Nothing is Left Behind The article “Bootleg music downloading a thing of the past? Not so, study says” reports on the not so abandoned bootlegging. It gives factual evidence to show how bootlegging is still in the present. Deleting a website for bootleg music downloading, did not decrease or stop the illegal downloads. There just seems to be another site to be deleted. However, legal websites like Pandora and Spotify did decrease the illegal downloads, but did not stop them. A majority would agree

been established. Napster Developed by programmers Sean Fanning and Sean Parker in 1999, Napster was a website that used peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing to allowed users to trade copyrighted music files stored on Napster’s servers without any payment necessary. P2P networks enable computers to connect directly to each other and utilize specialized

intellectual property infringement. A&M Records, Inc. v Napster Inc. addresses the issue of copyright infringement in regards to peer to peer file sharing. Does this program constitute fair use? And how does this case affect the future of file sharing and the music industry? In this paper, I will be examining the effect of illegal peer-to-peer file sharing on the music industry and how this case has changed the way we buy and share music today. Napster was founded in 1999 by college student, Shawn Fanning

intuitive, and simple (Elliott, 2011). Product decision, challenge of timing, being an evangelist for your product were just some of the factors in the development of the product. 2) How did Jobs weigh in on the Napster controversy and turn it into a win for Apple? A) When weighing in on the Napster controversy, Jobs and his cohorts at Apple insisted that the issue of music piracy was fundamentally behavioral, not technological (Elliott, 2011). Jobs

therefore they are all liable under an agency theory. Likewise, under copy right law, Contributory liability for copyright infringement requires that the secondary infringer know or have reason to know of direct infringement. A &M Records Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001) Does it matter that Keith’s intent was only to conceal his soft- rock proclivities and not the infringement?

infringers (Honigsberg, 2002). Metallica and Dr. Dre started to sue every single person who infringed their music. The better than expected sales of Radiohead’s album Kid A can be attributed to the premature release or “leakage” of the tracks on Napster. A study conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project surveyed 3,000 musicians and songwriters about their views about file sharing. Surprisingly, they found that 35% of the subjects agreed that file sharing was not necessarily bad because