Abraham Maslow's Humanistic Theory

967 Words4 Pages

Mid-Term Paper: Abraham Maslow – Humanistic Theory Focus upon studying, it has been observed that, it’s been above 150 years if one ruminates developmental phases of the psychological learning theories. These philosophies cite learning as the instrument to distinguish the implication and categorize it into the action, which only be executed by only its attracted personalities. In truth, assorted learning theories cultivate stronger with the passage of time by their proponents and researchers (Frank, 2014). Similarly, it is found that, different notions, such as behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, humanism, learning prototypes have been a good benchmark in the society when it comes to learning. Learning has undeniably an incongruous …show more content…

They have a propensity for having an enthusiastic viewpoint on human nature. They concentrate on the knack of human beings to meditate deliberately and realistically, so that they can standardize their genetic impulses, and to attain their full potential. In the humanistic interpretation, people are accountable for their survival and engagements and have the independence and will to alter their approaches and demeanor (Staddon, 2001).
Abraham Maslow and Humanistic Theory
Abraham Harold Maslow (1908 - 1970) is an American psychologist, who is renowned for forming Maslow 's hierarchy of needs, a model of psychological health grounded on satisfying inherent human necessities in precedence, leading towards the self-actualization. Looking at his efforts, he in fact is marked as the father and key supporter of Humanistic Psychology (Goud, 2008).
Maslow 's theory banks on the concept that experience is the principal aspect in the study of human knowledge and conduct. He puts stress on selection, resourcefulness, morals, self-realization, and all characteristically human abilities. He also believes that, meaning and subjectivity are more significant than independence. For Maslow, the growth of human potency, self-possession and value are definitive