Abstract Expressionism Vs Paint Pollock

558 Words3 Pages

The image is one of the first projects of Pollock, the character of the line was determined by physical and material variables. We can see the thickness of the paint and its different color that enhance abstracts. The painting looks like it has energies. In addition he would flick, and use secondary colors. The image has dark and light colors that enhance the abstract movement, where abstraction was the main factor, the arts work at that time were different from before, the artist were trying to avoid political ideology. In the paint Pollock includes a lot of object that we cannot see.

The group of artists known as Abstract Expressionists started his way in the United States after the World War II. Their work was characterized by non-objective …show more content…

The government included its different style as a reflection of American democracy, individualism, and cultural achievement, they were always promoting international exhibitions of Abstract Expressionism as a form of political propaganda during the Cold War. In contrast, many artists found it difficult to express emotional feeling in the Pollock style. Their work seamed to be lack of vitality.
For abstract expressionist artist, state that that the act of painting was more important than the result.

the traditional boundaries of art.
The movement Neo-Dada was applied to the works of artists such as Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, who were focusing on a radical change of modern art during the 1950s.
Neo-Dada artists were known for using mass media and found objects. These artists were against the emotional paintings of the Abstract. By introducing everyday subject and emphasizing performance.
Neo-Dada artists strategies were more suitable to the cold war climate. They celebrated consumer culture, and they were in contrast with abstraction and realism.
Neo-Dada artists wanted to inspire viewers to look beyond traditional aesthetic standards and see the art through a process of