Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the great the man
Alexander the great the man
Essay on alexander's leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
Madelyn Youtsey Mr... Caros/Mr. Bishop Western Civ. I/Composition 31 March 2023 The Legacy and Military Prowess of Alexander the Great Many conquerors have earned kleos, have built magnanimous empires, and had their name carved into stone like Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon but one of the most famous and influential conquerors was Alexander the Great.
Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia.
In addition, in the Legend of the Hat Band, he rewarded an innocent person who had done a service to him by killing him, showing that he relied so much on the legends that he was willing to kill a loyal soldier because it was thought that he might be a threat. He cared so much about legends that he was willing to sacrifice one of his own men. This does not seem like the act of someone ethical or wise as a great leader should be. A third reason that Alexander should not be considered great is that he used brutal methods to conquer land.
Alexander the Great Alexander III of Mutarch is a man known to be “Great,” but is that really so? Alexander was born in Macedonia, and he took charge of Macedonia at the age of 16 when his father left for an expedition. Although Alexander may have done some good deeds during his sovereignty for his people, it definitely does not outweigh the bad deeds he did to other people. Alexander received the name “Great” undeservingly because he did not exhibit examples of a good leader which should be one who is nonviolent, rational, and unselfish.
Alexander the Great deserves the title “The Great” due to all of his military achievements. For example, When Alexander was just sixteen years old, his cavalry defeated the Thebes. This shows his great leadership at an early age. He also created the largest empire the world has ever seen. Alexander was a great leader and king.
The video on YouTube by OgrnTv named “Engineering and Empire Greece Age of Alexander History Channel Documentary” describes the life of Alexander. Alexander was one of the history’s great commanders. He was well aware that he lived in ancient innovation, increase warfare. Alexander the Great employed the latest technology at that time to conquest civilizations. He transformed the lands from Egypt to India into a new Greek world.
I definitely think Alexander the Great was great. Although ruthless and short-tempered, he conquered the entirety of Southwest Asia, and I think it’s hard to argue him being a poor leader from that statement alone. Nonetheless he had many other accomplishments, he unified Greece, got revenge on Persia for burning the Acropolis in Athens, among other things. He was learning to be a leader from a young age, and, in fact, was tutored by Aristotle himself!. In addition, when thrusted into power after his father’s death, he systematically rid himself of domestic rivals to the throne, not to mention the speed and efficiency in which he did it.
The transformation of the Iatros began with Alexander the Great whose conquest through Egypt, in 322-321 BC, led to the foundation of Alexandria. As he took control of Egypt Alexander the Great continued his conquest East and left one of his Generals in charge, Ptolemy I. Eventually, Alexander the Great died which lead to a power vacuum amongst his generals, who went to war with one another. In light of these events, Ptolemy I declared himself the ruler of Egypt and sought to make Alexandria the economic and cultural capital of the Greek world. Ptolemy I, had a tremendous advantage with the wealth and papyrus of Egypt and was able to basically build Alexandria from the ground up.
Alexander the great was a Macedonian king who had a massive amount of land at his disposal. He is considered great because he pulled together a large group of military officials so strong it appeared as if he would never be stopped. He was; however, stopped, but he is still wrongly considered great. Alexander the great was not great because he battled mercilessly, stole the riches of the places he conquered for himself, and he had a disregard for the cultures of others.
Also, he showed a great interest in the people he conquered. I think Alexander deserves the title “The Great” because he unified all of Greece, he was welcomed into Egypt as a hero, and he conquered the great Persian empire. Alexander unified all of Greece by putting down the rebellion of Thebes. The Thebans received false information that Alexander had died, and tried to take this chance to declare their independence. Alexander gathered over thirty thousand troops.
Alexander III of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great, was one of the most successful and tactical military leaders. He built one of the largest empires in the ancient world, extending from Greece to India, in only 11 years. He inspired many future civilizations, causing Greece and other cultures to have similar literature, religions and dance. Alexander was responsible for spreading Greek culture to the cities he had conquered. The Hellenistic Age was the period during the 19th century, following Alexander, when Greek ideas and customs spread.
In spite of the greatness of Alexander, his legacy isn't without controversy. The speed of his conquests made people think of him as a ruthless and power hungry conqueror. When he conquered Thebes in 335 BCE and the violent incidents at Persepolis in 330 BCE are reminders of the darker facet of his ambition. In conclusion, Alexander the Great’s greatness can be a combination of army brilliance, his way of keeping his troops spirits up in the heat of battle, and being imaginative and unsuspecting for a united empire. His ability to encourage and lead his troops to victory against very powerful enemies, he also had inclusive governance regulations, distinguishes him as one of the most outstanding people in the
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
He was great for these main reasons, he had a vast empire with many different famous city-states, he had great intelligence and very good strategies when it comes to war, and he had a well known legacy with many achievements. One reason that Alexander the Great was great was because he had just a vast empire with many famous city-states throughout the empire. His empire was about 2,200,000 square miles at its greatest and when he died his empire was about 2,000,000 square miles. If you don’t say that’s a big empire for his age, that’s crazy (Doc E). His empire had over 70 city-states with 11 different Alexandrias’ which were named after him and were the most famous city-states over all (Doc A,E).