ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Influence

618 Words3 Pages

The actual history of Alexander the Great has been built up by numerous legends and myths that divinized his figure as the one chosen to conquest the known world of the moment. Throughout the historians of the era and art in general, many details about how his empire’s qualities slowly changed have been found, and those features have been very similar in mostly all of his conquered empire, especially Persian lands. Since he was very little he seemed curious by the Persian Empire such as the conquest of Macedonia by this nation. He found his model to imitate in Achilles, main character of the history written by Homer. Bucephalus, his black horse, accompanied him during his travel conquering the majority of Asia. So was the link he had with this horse that after its death, several conquered cities were named after him.
His conquest began the 335 b.C after he was named Hegemon and finished with the rebellion in Greece. Although his army wasn’t as numerous as the Persian Empire’s one was, the soldiers of Darius III, Alexander’s strategy was to end with the nation as soon as he could. All the Persian cities seemed to oppose to the conquest because of the benefits and well-being they were having thanks to the economic policies imposed by the nation. That was one detail Alexander paid attention to in order to convince the occupied territories not …show more content…

The crosswise formation made the morale of the enemy corps decrease exponentially while the victory spree of Alexander made his person seem like if he was the chosen one to subjugate every place he went. Nevertheless numerous battalions of the recently defeated populations joined the new troops of the Macedonian Empire, which was now not only formed by Greeks and Macedonians, but also by Persian cavalry and different armed forces from a vast variety of

Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

He was known and still is known as Alexander the Great, till today. To say, Alexander’s empire was 2,000,000 square miles (Document E) after his death and it took him 11 years (Document E) to build his empire (took so much time). Unfortunately, his empire held together only for 10 years (Document E) after his death, which was a very short time. As we know, he was a very intelligent military leader.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander was practically unbeatable shown that every war fought resulted in him succeeding and winning over the land. Another piece of evidence is the statistics of his legacy, Alexander’s territory grew to a massive 2,000,000 sq miles. As well as this he was able to take control of this much land in only 11 years (Doc E). He was only around 30 years old when he met his fathers goal of conquering the Persia Empire. Alexander made this achievement look easy when it only took a few conflicts and through this he still care for his soldiers and never put himself first unless he was leading his army into

Read More
1756 Words | 8 Pages

This is why Thebes first revolted but through the rebellion, he was able to prove his point, show his military brilliance, and rule with a gentle but strong hold. During the time of his death, Alexander the Great had a large influence and a massive number of cities. His empire was two million square miles and he had founded seventy cities. He accomplished this over eleven years (Doc. X). His army marched, marched, and marched on and year after year, day after day, they conquered.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander III was arguably one of the greatest and most effective emperors in the history of civilizations. During his 13 year reign over Macedonia from 336 B.C. to 323 B.C, he greatly advanced the Macedonian Empire by nearly tripling the size of the empire, spreading Hellenistic culture throughout the ancient world and unifying the diverse ethnic groups of his vast empire under it, and improving the empire’s economy by forging new trade connections. Without his skillful leadership, Macedonia would not have become the dominant power it became at its peak. Within 4 years of when he first took the throne in 336 B.C., Alexander expanded the empire from the kingdom of Macedon itself to the area around the eastern half of the Mediterranean Sea, including Thrace, Anatolia, and the upper part of Egypt.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Most cities surrendered to Alexander without a fight. When Alexander reached the city of Tyre, they did not surrender because they believed that they were unconquerable, due to their protection by walls and location of an island. Alexander decided that their answer was not acceptable. Therefore, he began to build a causeway into Tyre that would allow Alexander and his army to enter the city. When Tyre held out for seven months, Alexander responded with violence.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander was able to lead the kingdom of Macedon to victory towards the “Thracian people called the Maedi” (Jarus) and renaming the city Alexandroupolis. Not only does this demonstrate his confidence as an individual, but

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander also didn’t think of the future of his people because he hadn’t even thought of the idea of leaving someone to take over his empire after he died, displaying his lack of concern for others and political

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction 1. Alexander became the ruler of Macedon in 336 BC taking over from his father Phillip II. Immediately after taking over, he conquered all of Greece defeating powerful armies of Sparta and Athenia. His greed for wealth, power, recognition and prestige took him to the mighty Kingdom of Persia and on the pretext of avenging attack by the Persian ruler Xerxes in 480 BC, he engaged the mighty Persians in three major battles. The brilliant strategist and ferocious commander Alexander was, he was knocking the doors of India by 326 BC.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

The real reason that Alexander wanted to conquer the Persian Empire was not only retaliation or revenge, but also as a test of his true abilities. In addition to this, Alexander also wanted to commence the invasion because it was what his father had been planning to do for quite a while. Arrian shows that Alexander thought of his invasion not as a personal grudge but purely business as usual. This act doesn’t fit with the motto of revenge especially since it’s shown that Alexander has extremely little respect for Darius. Arrian said “They think Darius is dead and they are mourning him.’

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

One of Alexander’s first military feats was the battle against the Macedonians and the Thebans. The Thebans were bitter about the treatment they had received from Alexander’s father, Phillip. Phillip had held Thebans prisoners and even executed some of them. So when Alexander became the new Macedonian king after his late

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The conquests of Alexander the Great during the 4th century BC undoubtedly transformed the ancient world, bringing people of foreign lands into contact with Greek ideals and customs that spawned a unique Hellenistic period of both decaying and generative traditions. Despite the historical dramatization of Alexander, emphasizing his charisma and intellect as being the driving forces in creating an empire of a size that had never been imagined before, the contexts of cultural tension between Greek and Persian societies, a fractious Greek political state, and civil strife from an overpopulated Greek world greatly supplemented Alexander’s inherent traits in clearing a path for him to rise and embark on a path of conquest in the pursuit of eternal

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

In Alexander’s 15 years of conquest he never lost a battle Alexander named over 70 cities after himself, and one after his horse Alexander was trained from birth to be a ruler, learning from his parents He became king of Macedon at 20 years old, causing revolts to break out His father, Philip II had built a strong empire in Ancient Greece that he inherited He conquered the Persian empire, who had been under Persian rule for over 200 years, at age 26 He died before he turned 33

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Influence

Related Topics

Open Document