ipl-logo

Alexander The Great's Success

1372 Words6 Pages

Alexander The Great’s complex character juxtaposed with his indisputably remarkable military approach to expansionism, poses one of the greatest, historically intricate debates of all time: was alexander the great actually great? or was he an impressive tyrant who due to his opportune background inherited political potential that took minimal effort to pursue and inadvertently led him to success? Alexander the great’s undoubted military success and geographical expansion undertaken during his reign, was unique and powerful. However, Alexanders attainment of the epithet “great” should not only be confined to his successful military achievements, rather an holistic collection and assessment of his personal characteristics. Alexanders Greatness …show more content…

This text along with that of Rufus’ other works are however, uniquely isolated and were most likely censored or prescribed by the respective senate or emperors in power at this time, adopting a bias nature. There is also reference to Alexander’s greatness by Roman texts, specifically within Titus Maccius Plautus’ play Mostellaraia. It is evident through both of these sources that the establishment and reasoning behind Alexander’s title is continually derived from his known ability to both defeat and succeed in the collection of military and expansionist battles he had fought in. The dismissal of such complex political components and concepts is foreshadowed by the emphasis placed on Alexanders approach to military conquest in which was uniquely unpredictable, and unusually lead the leader to success. The Phalanx approach to battle though, was a concept not even contrived from Alexanders analytical thinking rather an inherited tactic from his father king Phillip II. With reference to his military feats it is also evident that the success should indeed be attributed to alexanders father King Phillip II, in that the phalanx tactic that he had developed, was principally utilised and is a pertinent reason for Alexanders success. In every major battle Alexander’s Macedonian army won, phalanxes marched in an unbreakable mass formation, while alexander led the Cavalry along the enemies weakness. Oftentimes the winning move was a simple suicide charge against the enemy initiating the opposition to flee the field, and in comparison to the other great militant generals of the world it becomes evident that alexanders tactics were not strategic moves of analytical emphasis nor was he a tactical master, he was just an intimidating

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

The people who were conquered believe that he was brutal and relentless. Based on the information, Alexander was a great military leader and a great king. In the first part of document A, it takes the conquerors perspective of how great Alexander was. It states that he treated some of the rebels with compassion.

Read More
1756 Words | 8 Pages

Madelyn Youtsey Mr... Caros/Mr. Bishop Western Civ. I/Composition 31 March 2023 The Legacy and Military Prowess of Alexander the Great Many conquerors have earned kleos, have built magnanimous empires, and had their name carved into stone like Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon but one of the most famous and influential conquerors was Alexander the Great.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

One of the greatest conquistadors in history was Alexander III of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great. Behind his accomplishments of taking down the dominant Persia and the mighty Egypt, stands a leader who is confident, driven, a risk taker, a great communicator, and is both tactically and technically proficient. Alexander the Great is a prime example of the army’s definition of an adaptive leader. The young conqueror began his path to becoming a leader when he took over his father’s kingdom at the age of sixteen.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander the Great Alexander III of Mutarch is a man known to be “Great,” but is that really so? Alexander was born in Macedonia, and he took charge of Macedonia at the age of 16 when his father left for an expedition. Although Alexander may have done some good deeds during his sovereignty for his people, it definitely does not outweigh the bad deeds he did to other people. Alexander received the name “Great” undeservingly because he did not exhibit examples of a good leader which should be one who is nonviolent, rational, and unselfish.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

His empire collapsed not long after (Background Essay). Due to his role in the world when he was alive, Alexander the Great’s greatness should be measured

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander’s military brilliance was unquestionable. He was a leader invincible in both, siege warfare and set battles. In addition to that, his intelligence and communications skills were immaculate. The Roman historian Arrian, in his account Alexander Puts Down a Mutiny, explains Alexander’s ability of communication and leadership skills, “[M]arching out from a country too poor to maintain you decently, [I] laid open for you at a blow, and in spite of Persia’s naval supremacy, the gates of the Hellespont. My cavalry crushed the satraps of Darius, and I added all Ionia and Aeolia, the two Phrygias and Lydia to your empire….

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

The video on YouTube by OgrnTv named “Engineering and Empire Greece Age of Alexander History Channel Documentary” describes the life of Alexander. Alexander was one of the history’s great commanders. He was well aware that he lived in ancient innovation, increase warfare. Alexander the Great employed the latest technology at that time to conquest civilizations. He transformed the lands from Egypt to India into a new Greek world.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

Charlemagne gave Carolingians a cultural reform by bringing unity in Western Empire. He brought stability in Europe and united France that made him the “Patron of Rome, Guardian of Roman church, and defender of the faith.” Both Alexander the Great and Charlemagne brought change to their country and honor to their countrymen. But it was the demonstration of their military superiority and skillful tactics and strategies that one of them truly deserve the title of “the Great.” Alexander’s leadership skills became apparent when he defeated the Maedi when he was only sixteen.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

SECTION I: Alexander III of Macedon who is also known as Alexander the Great. He was born in July of 356 BC to Queen Olympias and King Phillip II of Macedon. As a young child Alexander the Great was tutored by the famous Greek philosopher, Aristotle. At a very young age he aided in the Battle of Chaeronea alongside his father. Also, at a young age his father King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander’s father, was assassinated and subsequently died.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

The conquests of Alexander the Great during the 4th century BC undoubtedly transformed the ancient world, bringing people of foreign lands into contact with Greek ideals and customs that spawned a unique Hellenistic period of both decaying and generative traditions. Despite the historical dramatization of Alexander, emphasizing his charisma and intellect as being the driving forces in creating an empire of a size that had never been imagined before, the contexts of cultural tension between Greek and Persian societies, a fractious Greek political state, and civil strife from an overpopulated Greek world greatly supplemented Alexander’s inherent traits in clearing a path for him to rise and embark on a path of conquest in the pursuit of eternal

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Genetically modifying food has caused many controversy around the world for the way food has been modified. The food we eat is canned, fresh, and ready to be eaten. Most of the food has also been genetically modified. Although modifying food has been used for many years, many countries have not adapted or wanted to genetically modify their foods. Genetically modifying food is a good and bad thing, but there will always be different opinions about genetically modified food, but one thing is for sure, genetically modifying food will be happening more and more as time goes on.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great's Success

Open Document