ipl-logo

Alvin Carl Plantinga Research Paper

858 Words4 Pages

Alvin Carl Plantinga
Alvin Carl Plantinga born on November 15, 1932. He is an American analytic philosopher who major in logic, justification, philosophy of religion, and epistemology. Moreover, from 1983 to 1986, Plantinga also known as a prominent Christian philosopher and served president of the Society of Christian Philosophers. “America’s leading orthodox Protestant philosopher of God” is the title that being given to him and it was described by Time magazine. Alvin Plantinga has avowedly been trying to establish the rationality of believing without evidence that God exists. “It is entirely right, rational, reasonable, and proper to believe in God without any evidence or argument at all.” These words or quote was taken from the quotation …show more content…

• There is no evidence or at any rate not sufficient evidence for the proposition that God exists.
Alvin Plantinga has canvassed them lucidly in his books Does God have a Nature? A substance’s essence, says Plantinga, will be a certain one of its properties – that conjunctive property which includes as conjuncts those properties which all which the substances has in all possible worlds in which it exists. So if God is identical with God’s essence, then God is identical with a property. But God, being a person, is not a property.
As the Christian sees things, Plantinga claims, ours is a suffering God. The pressure to reject divine impassibility are clear: to modern sensibilities an impossible deity seems woefully out of touch with both biblical and personal experience; they value a God who suffers with us, who hears and responds to our prayers, who is active in redemptive history and attentive to our personal needs. They want God who loves us and is responsive to our free choices, who answer prayer and when they lose their way, coaxes them back to themselves. …show more content…

His theory was known as Kalam Cosmological theory. This theory is about the existence of universe thus will explains the existence of god by his philosophical thinking. Imam Al-Ghazali who was a theologian from the 12th-century that lives in Persia concerned about the Muslim theologians in his day were being highly influenced by the Greek philosophy, and this happen to make the theologian denied the creation of the universe by God (Allah S.W.T.) instead these philosophers held that the universe just flows necessarily out of being the being of God. Therefore, this universe was eternal and beginning less and in fact just as necessary as God is the world as a sort of emanation out of the being of god. After thoroughly studying the writings of these philosophers, Imam Al-Ghazali wrote a withering critique of their views in a book of his own entitled “The Incoherence of the Philosopher’s. In this book. Imam Al-Ghazali argues that the idea of a beginning less universe is absurd. He argues that the universe must have a beginning and since nothing comes into being without a cause there must be a transcendent creator of the

Show More
Related

Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More

Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

590 Words | 3 Pages

Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.

Read More

The Warren Flew Debate On The Existence Of God Summary

991 Words | 4 Pages

This book report serves as both a brief overview and an evaluation of The Warren-Flew Debate on the Existence of God, which is the manuscript from the oral debate held between Thomas B. Warren and Antony G. Flew in Denton, Texas from September 20 through September 23, 1976. This debate (as suggested by the title) centered on the existence of God, with Flew affirming, “I know that God does not exist,” and Warren affirming, “I know that God does exist.” The debate took place over a period of four nights; each night the speakers had three twenty-minute speeches that were delivered alternately (the affirmative speaker spoke first), and a one and a half minute rejoinder delivered by the affirmative speaker to close each night. Flew was in the affirmative

Read More

Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

933 Words | 4 Pages

The question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.

Read More

Richard Dawkins Research Paper

816 Words | 4 Pages

He is well known for his theories of how the universe came to be and theories on black holes. He has written an entire book on the basis of why he is an atheist, specifically why God is not needed to explain the origin of the universe. In this book, called The Grand Design, he explains the reasons as to why the universe exists, saying that God is pointless. He says the most important part of his book

Read More

The Design Argument: Does God Exist

965 Words | 4 Pages

In this he questions the attributes of God that are traditionally used to describe him. He claims that there is a lack of foundational evidence to prove that God is not only the creator of the universe but is the All Mighty God that he is described as (Speaks). Rather than Hume arguing that Paley’s argument is false, he focuses heavily on if God even exists or if he is the higher figure that he is painted as. Another argument that can be used against Paley is the theory of the Big Bang Theory.

Read More

Kalam Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

803 Words | 4 Pages

The Kalam Cosmological Argument The Kalam Cosmological Argument is a theory of religion that attempts to explain the existence of God by the following: Whatever began to exist must have a cause, unlike God, the Universe began to exist, Thus, there must be an uncaused cause of the Universe, namely God. Through examining the many criticisms of this argument, it is discernible that it is not valid and does not achieve the purpose of proving God's existence. The Kalam Cosmological Argument is favorable over Tomas Aquainas’ traditional Cosmological Argument, which says: Some things are caused, nothing can cause itself, so everything must be caused by an external force, namely God, because it is more specific, especially by encapsulating evidence

Read More

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

2349 Words | 10 Pages

124). His other point is that God having a sufficient reason for permitting evil is not the same as having a hallucination. He states that having good reason for the existence of God increases the possibility that He has a reason for permitting gratuitous suffering (p. 124). He also counters the claim that there is no evidence to suggest that God is all-good and all-powerful. He refers to his moral argument—wherein without the existence of God, objective moral values would also cease to exist, but objective moral values do exist and thus God also must exist—to make the claim that God is all-good (p. 125).

Read More

The Cosmological Argument For The Rationality Of Believing In God

627 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God.

Read More

Mackie's Argument Analysis

1663 Words | 7 Pages

It is evident evil exists but it is not clear whether God exists. The purpose of Mackie’s and Plantinga’s argument is to prove whether or not God exist based on the existence of evil. Mackie does not agree on the existence of God and uses philosophy to prove it. He believes that there is no rational evidence that

Read More

Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

1372 Words | 6 Pages

Philosopher William Rowe agrees with Plantinga that propositions — that evil exists, God is omnipotent, and God is wholly good — is not logically inconsistent. Rowe does not believe it is impossible to allow God and his properties to exist along with evil. He takes a different route by focusing more on certain kinds of evil which evidently exist in the world, and not so much on the inconsistencies of the theist doctrines. This certain evil, in Rowe’s point of view, will show that a God who is all powerful and wholly good does not exist after all.

Read More

Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

1444 Words | 6 Pages

The cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it

Read More

Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More

Essay Ontological Argument For The Existence Of God

818 Words | 4 Pages

At times we at dilemma or in difficulty then help comes for us in a mysterious way. Majority of us might have experienced this and exclaim that second in joy “God’s ways are mysterious. I have got full faith in god now”. God always exists before us we always search for god. “He is closer to us than our breath , nearer than our hands and feet what we taste ,small and feel” is god.

Read More

God's Not Dead Analysis

915 Words | 4 Pages

Dominican philosopher and theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, created the “Five Ways” of God’s existence – motion, causation, contingency, gradations, intelligence of design – in which the first two are cosmological arguments. Aquinas’s argument from motion states that it’s obvious some things in the universe are moving, and if they’re moving, something else must have caused them to move, and something else must have caused that to move… and so on. However, the pattern of movements can’t go on forever since there wouldn’t be that one thing that started the whole series. Therefore, there must be an “initial mover, an extraordinary being that started the universe moving but is not itself moved by anything else – and this being we call God,” (Vaughn, Lewis. Pg. 65).

Read More

More about Alvin Carl Plantinga Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document