ipl-logo

America Was A Phrase Attributed To President Monroe And Elaborated By John Quincy Adams

1453 Words6 Pages

Introduction “America for the Americans” was a phrase attributed to President Monroe and elaborated by John Quincy Adams. The phrase “America for the Americans” is the main essence of the Monroe Doctrine. This Doctrine represents how America has to interact with other countries, especially with the European powers and the nations that are geographically near the USA. For the Americans many foreign issues were and are still based on this doctrine since 19 century. In order to understand the context where Monroe Doctrine was created it is important to have in mind three international facts: first the conformation and consolidation of America through their independence, second the forging of a new nation, and third the construction of a new empire. …show more content…

They were divided because they do not share the same ideas, the states in the north was not agree with the slavery and the states in the south, states that base their economy in primary activities like agriculture were agree on have slaves and they do not want to allowed to change that situations, but they were agree in one thing they know that they have to stay together in order to be a successful nation and contain the European powers they need to find a way to construct an empire even if they did not think the …show more content…

Wilson admits that this situation had to change and USA should treat Latin Americans countries as their equal’s but he also suggest that the countries should adopt the doctrine of the president Monroe he said it was important that no nation should intervene in other nations politics, that is a little contradictory to the Monroe Doctrine, cause the doctrine was in favor to intervene foreign issues of other states, when USA feel that European power try to influence in Latin Americans counties, also he tried to join USA to lead of nations but the congress refused because they said that Europeans problems were not a matter of concern, as we could see during the international affairs during the Wilson administration was a combination of Isolanist as a way to stay apart of European issues and Internalization as a way to remain they world that USA was a strong

Show More
Related

How Did Us Foreign Policy Changes Between 1920 And 1941

595 Words | 3 Pages

Nostra heard about the Monroe Doctrine and had some idea to change it up. Ithad no more of it to be used solely for economic dominance and imperialism by the United States, but in conjunction with its twenty neighbors, to defend the collective security of the Western Hemisphere. But changing the Monroe Doctrine only changed some of its power. Still, the Monroe Doctrine could still have advance American economic and political interests in the Western

Read More

Monroe Doctrine Dbq

186 Words | 1 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was a major factor in shaping the United States and its involvement with other countries from Europe and in the Western Hemisphere. The doctrine was the result of a few diplomatic problems. “The first was the minor clash with Russia concerning the northwest coast of North America. In this quarrel, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams expressed the principle that the American continents were no longer to be considered as a field for colonization by European powers“("Monroe Doctrine.") The Monroe Doctrine initially called for an end to any intervention in the Americas by European countries, but the doctrine was later expanded to include all of the Western Hemisphere.

Read More

Reasons Why The North Did Not Support Slavery In 1860

427 Words | 2 Pages

In 1860, the U.S. was divided. It was divided into the North, South, and New Territories. It was also divided in terms of their views on slavery. The North believed that slavery was wrong, the South completely supported the idea, and the West was indifferent at the time.

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

1104 Words | 5 Pages

Originally, as a new nation emerging, the United States was focused on building and stabilizing itself in order to seem powerful to foreign countries. However, as time went on, the North and the South disagreed over various issues and were eventually divided. Many events arose which worsened the split between the North and South after the Antebellum Era, resulting in the South seceding from the Union. The reason why Southern states seceded from the Union in 1860 and 1861 was the controversy over slavery between the North and the South. One main event that contributed to the controversy over slavery and the South’s secession was Abraham Lincoln’s election.

Read More

Civil War South Vs North

386 Words | 2 Pages

South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

847 Words | 4 Pages

The United States of America was once severely divided over an extreme issue that needed to be quickly solved before it caused any serious damage on the country. The Northern part and the Southern part of the United States of America were both having intense arguments over the issue of slavery. The North deeply accepted the abolishment of slavery in the United States of America. However, the South was strongly supporting on the ability of having slaves anywhere in the United States of America. Before the American Civil War, the North had a immoral perspective on slavery and the South had a righteous outlook on slavery they had contrasting ideas.

Read More

Ap Slavery Dbq Essay

524 Words | 3 Pages

Slavery created division of United States, one side supported slavery and the other opposed. The Northern people didn’t need slaves due to the very little amount of agriculture they had, whereas in the South where they had much more agriculture, they felt they needed the slaves. I believe that the true separation between the North and South was in the people. 4th of July celebrations are hypocritical to slaves. Slaves considered this celebration as a sham, because they were not independent, they weren’t free.

Read More

William Mckinley On American Expansionism

374 Words | 2 Pages

William McKinley in his thoughts on American Expansionism has identified the reasons why America had no other choice but to incorporate Philippines as a part of it. This writing has been lifted from the excerpts of an interview with William McKinley soon after Spain had surrendered in the Spanish-American war. McKinley cleverly talks in this interview about how Philippines just came and fell into the laps of America thereby suggesting the helpless stance of America. He talks about how America’s sole intention and purpose had only been to safeguard its own interests as a country. He had to order that the Spanish fleets in Manila be destroyed because if left unattended, they would have crossed the Pacific and wreaked havoc in the American states

Read More

Emancipation Proclamation Dbq

1713 Words | 7 Pages

One of the major turning points in United States history occurred on January 1, 1863, when the Emancipation Proclamation was enacted. After the civil war, the country was split between Union and Confederate States which further divided the country. A number of white supremacy groups began to flourish in the post war south, specifically The White League and the Ku Klux Klan. Various legislative orders were enacted due to these groups. The Emancipation Proclamation and the Enforcement Acts changed the frame of the post war south.

Read More

Rhetorical Strategies Used In True Americanism By Theodore Roosevelt

505 Words | 3 Pages

Americanism can be defined in many different ways. In Theodore Roosevelt’s speech, “True Americanism”, he portrays his idea of what Americanism means. Throughout his speech, Roosevelt uses rhetorical strategies to persuade people to unite regardless of a person’s race or religious beliefs to create a strong, powerful country. Roosevelt uses appeal to identity to create the appeal of pathos.

Read More

The Monroe Doctrine: An Expression Of Nationalism In The US

169 Words | 1 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was an expression of nationalism, through United States’ s claims of lands in the Americas which have not yet been discovered. Through an address to Congress President Monroe stated that the United States will stay out of European affairs and wars. Therefore, The United States put aside the European problems and focus on his own country. As well, President James Monroe indicated that The United States would consider establishment of any new colonies or interference with independent countries in the Americas as hostile act to The United States. However, the USA eliminated the threat of foreign countries taking land that they will claim to.

Read More

Effects Of The Monroe Doctrine

119 Words | 1 Pages

Robert, I agree with you. The Monroe Doctrine was meant to send a message to the world. In fact, it was synonymous of independence and nationalism in America. Europe and other countries could pose a threat with their wars and wish of colonization. Monroe was definitely setting boundaries by saying that America would oppose European powers from trying to colonize the territory.

Read More

The Monroe Doctrine

825 Words | 4 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.

Read More

Analysis Of The Monroe Doctrine

198 Words | 1 Pages

COLLAPSE President James Monroe wrote the "Monroe" doctrine to solidify the US independance and distance itself from european powers they would not interfeared with european wars and would remain peaceful to protect its own borders. The doctrone was written while Portragal was getting its independace from Spain and President James Monroe noted the distance between Spain and colonized Mexico and he said it was obvious that Spain could never hold it in the doctrine Monroe stated that our southern bretheren if left to themselves what of adopted the doctrine of their own accord President James Monroe said to leave other colonized lands alone so they can hope to claim independance and weaken european powers. They relate to early revolution and

Read More

Negative Effects Of Latin American Imperialism

519 Words | 3 Pages

The Monroe Doctrine was written because the US was worried that European powers would try to take over land from the Western Hemisphere. President Monroe made four points when he founded the Monroe Doctrine. Firstly stating that the United States would not get involved with international wars between European powers. Secondly the United States wouldn't engage with existing colonies in the western hemisphere. Third, most of the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization.

Read More

More about America Was A Phrase Attributed To President Monroe And Elaborated By John Quincy Adams

Related Topics

Open Document