Analysis Of Affirmative Action: A Hurtful Tactic Chosen By Colleges

Affirmative Action, a Hurtful Tactic Chosen by Colleges Yearly early, it is brought to public attention the boundaries, exigencies, academic requirements, desirable college admissions test scores, the idea of being involved in extracurricular activities, and the increasing pressure for these students to not only graduate from high school, as well being admitted to their dream college. Thus, it is a constant battle these students have to endure to earn a “fat envelope”. However, is Affirmative Action policy the best admissions tactics to tackle those piling college applications? Before, expanding our discussion one must define what Affirmative Action is. According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary Affirmative action is a call for

Now, leading the audience to ponder on what extent this forced gender balance policy includes students who are truly committed in the expansion of their knowledge? College admissions officers have been testing multiple methods, so they can effectively evaluate massive piles of applications sent by prospective and give a fair response. Although, changes are being made in the methodologies Britz said “Rest assured that admissions officers are not cavalier in making their decisions” (771). Such statement leads us to believe in the unfairness of rejecting females applicants. Admission officers spend hours verifying student applications, judging them based on outstanding academic background as well as whether or not the applicant is fitted to become a member of next year’s freshman community. Perhaps, you are thinking: “Are the same requirements being analyzed when officers are looking application sent by

Britz informed that in a certain year; “approximately fifty-five percent of Though Kenyon applications were from female” and the admittance rate suggested that for every 3 applicants only one would receive “the fat envelope”. The reason given is “The reality is that because young men are rarer, they’re more valued applicants (772). Thereby, its integrity is questioned publically demanding for evaluation, even amendments to the entire process. Admissions officers spend a surplus amount of hours in conference rooms; however, it does not hinder discriminatory methodologies, gender biased stereotypes as determining factors of a candidate’s fate defying “Equal Rights Amendment.” Among so many other evaluative options it is absolutely outrageous choosing statistics over qualifications. Hence, the community of administrators should shift their focus from statistical values and, partake to other aspects, which; lies beyond a mailed package as ethics, morals, civics, disregarding the gender of the person who sent a certain manila