Analysis Of Into The Wild, By Jon Krakeur

566 Words3 Pages

It is often said that literature is a voice for social commentary.
How is this true for a work you have read?
“I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement and danger and the chance to sacrifice myself for love”, a highlighted passage of a book found near Chris McCandless' lifeless remains (Krakauer, 15). McCandless, a young man that went to venture the wilderness with a lack of adequate resources, emphasizes his desire to experience adventure. In Into the Wild, by Jon Krakeur, explains this commitment for this journey while showing McCandless’ eagerness to become self-independent, when the kindness of others was the reason why he was able to survive for so long. His journey comes to an end due to lack of resources that is no longer able to …show more content…

The author mainly brings McCandless into a positive light through what quotes are incorporated, which is most likely influenced through his similarities to Chris McCandless, in pursuing their passion for nature and prioritizing it over further continuing their education after a certain point in achieving a degree in college. (Clark, 2022). “He was unheeded, happy, and near to the wildheart of life. He was alone and young and wilful and wildhearted, alone amid a waste of wild air and brackish waters and the sea harvest of shells and tangle and veiled grey sunlight” (31). This focus on the environment emphasize an understanding of why McCandless was therefore, But, it isn;t really portrayed in a way that shows the nature’s beauty. It shows that others may not understand what kind of beauty that McCandless may see. This voice for social commentary may show that not everyone may recognize this way of life he is living, but this idea is contrasted against Krakeur’s opinion on this case with his own comparisons to his own