Analysis Of Teal Pfeifer's Essay

In this sincere essay, Teal Pfeifer creates an logical appeal that enlightens readers about the desperate need to boycott the magazines that use impractical female bodies, causing damage to young women. Pfeifer’s analytical evidence promotes an informative tone that makes her more trustworthy. Pfeifer states that according to research of Liz Dittrich, “twenty-seven percent reported that the images of models exerted direct pressure on them to lose weight” (Pfeifer 255). Pfeifer creates reasonable appeal with specific evidence based on studies that have been performed supporting her purpose to inform the reader. This creates an informative tone by including evidence of the situation at hand relating to the amount of women suffrage through the images exposed to them. Using direct statistics based off of research, Pfeifer provides a sound argument of the harm that media pressure can apply to young girls, producing a more trusting effect to the reader because of her specific

Pfeirfer takes examples from Cesar Chavez in his significance to boycotting history and explains that “[i]n these instances, not only did the boycott force an industry to improve existing conditions, but it also created a profound awareness of pressing labor issues, often forming a bond between the workers and the community their labor was benefiting” (Pfeifer 257-258). Pfeifer develops a judicious point by bringing an example of history to the surface. Historical analogies prove that have happened once gives the audience belief that it may happen again. Presenting examples that have been successful gives the reader a sense of “This makes sense”, which receives a thoughtful response from the reader. The resulting effects after the boycott manifests a convincing logical argument that to help solve the problems of young women everywhere, is to boycott the magazines that promote the “ideal