ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

1466 Words6 Pages

If you were a college athlete, would you be satisfied with the NCAA and universities making tons of money while you know you were the reason they make so much in the first place? Do you think the NCAA should pay college players? College athletes should be paid because they bring in so much money to the colleges, universities, and NCAA. They put so much time and work into that sport that they barely focus on school. Most college athletes only go to school to have a better chance of becoming a professional athlete for that sport, especially in basketball and football. When collegiate sports first started they made back then does not compare to how much they make The NCAA and Universities make so much money because of the athetlets that come to their programs. The NCAA and college sports is a multi-billion dollar industry thanks to college athletes. The NCAA makes roughly about 1 billion per year since 2006 (Kirshner. 2018). Most of their money comes from television coverage and marketing campaigns. The rest comes from ticket sales and student fees. All 231 division 1 colleges to date …show more content…

“Lest you think I exaggerate, look up the case of the two athletes at the University of Iowa who started a T-shirt screening business and were threatened with ineligibility by the N.C.A.A. because their website mentioned that they met because they were both — brace yourself — swimmers” (Rosenberg, 2017). Paying collegiate athletes would also help develop athletes better if they do stay longer instead of rushing to go pro and then failing to be something because the they were not for that type of exposure. Injury is another reason why they should get paid. No matter what sport you play, you’re always putting your life on the line when you play that sport. “Paying players could guarantee them a degree of financial security, and prevent some from leaving prematurely” (Labaton,

Show More
Related
965 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, Hartnett stated that the people making money off of them other than the schools themselves, were the coaches as well as the NCAA. The article states that, “Many coaches earn at least $100,00 per year to coach one of the major sports” (Hartnett par. 11). It is true that the schools pay the coaches, because they are their employers, the money that the athletes bring in go more towards themselves. Murphy states that “the revenue that [sporting events] brings in usually doesn’t outweigh the costs of running the programs.

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

Men’s football and basketball make the most money for college athletics. If they were to be paid based on the money brought in, a majority of the college athletic programs would become disabled due to lack of money. If a sport does not generate a large revenue, their athletes could be paid less. Do they cut the funding to those programs because a large part of the athletics budget goes to paying the larger programs? The NCAA already has a structure in place to keep the balance that could be caused by paying the college athletes.

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

Pay the Players The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) has been making billions of dollars off of young college athletes since 1906 when it was founded. The NCAA is the association that college sports teams play under. So our beloved Ohio State Buckeyes, for example, are under the rule of the NCAA. All of the Division 1 schools with sports programs also have contracts with clothing brands such as Michigan signing with the Jordan brand and Oregon being with Nike and the schools get money from them because they are basically advertising for the clothing brands.

Read More
1393 Words | 6 Pages

For example there are “72000 participants in NCAA football. 16000 are eligible to play professional and only 250 are drafted. 1.6% of college football players go pro.” said NCAA website. If playing at the professional level is something a football player would want, I would fully expect a D1 athlete to play at a school that would give him the most opportunity at the professional level.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Argument: ‘It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education.’ from Anderson. So why should college athletes be paid, since they are based on their reputation. College student-athletes are given a rare opportunity. For example before you go to college you will get scouted from the university during high school.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes staying pure to the game College athletes should not be paid to play, they should not be paid to play because it is something that they have to work for and in a way it would replace scholarships. College athletes already receive scholarships and they are meant to help them with their schooling and education, not to play sports. College athletes are also students and most of them will already receive scholarship from the college. The scholarship alone should be plenty of enough money for a student, to be paid more on top of that would just be ridiculous and unreasonable. For many young athlete, going to college to play the game you love is a once and a lifetime opportunity and privilege.

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA made more money in 2014 than the NBA and NHL. But the college athletes saw none of that money. People who don't believe college athletes should be paid argue that they get to go to school for free. They are right, but is that really enough? College athletes are seen as professional athletes but they are not paid like them.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Should college athletes be paid for playing in their sport? There is an argument to be made on both sides of the issue surrounding their compensation. While some people believe that college athletes should be paid extra for their time in their sport. Others believe that they already receive enough compensation through their scholarships they were given. This discussion has been going on for a very long time, and many past college athletes have argued the same argument.

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA puts its money where its mission is, equipping student-athletes to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom, and throughout life. They aren’t trying to make it so their athletes can live from an income from their sport during college. They are trying to prepare them for the future and help them succeed. In the article “Should NCAA rules be changed to allow intercollegiate athletes to be paid a salary for participating in sports?” (Handy)

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

And this may change college sports forever. ”(Bowen, 2014). Another source said “Athletes earn their schools hundreds of thousands of dollars, increase enrollment, and if they do well, provide a recruiting piece for generations. Top NCAA executives are getting $1 million per year while an athlete can't earn $50 from signing a few autographs. ”(Harnett, 2013).

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

Every year the NCAA makes around one billion dollars (Alesia). While the NCAA as a whole made this sum of money other leagues like the NHL (National Hockey League) make only around two-hundred and seventeen dollars (Badenhausen). Most of their profits come from TV advertising and licences. This is supported by figure B (Revenue). While the NCAA is making a billion dollars a year, it is the colleges that receive most of that capita.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

I’ve never had a strong opinion on whether college athletes should be able to get paid or not. Both sides have persuaded me, but I never really dug deep into this topic. Now that I have searched a lot deeper and developed my own opinion, I believe that college athletes should be able to be paid. College athletes, specifically division one players, have a very high value in terms of "cash." These athletes are worth so much more money than a full-ride scholarship.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Open Document