ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

1141 Words5 Pages

The NCAA made more money in 2014 than the NBA and NHL. But the college athletes saw none of that money. People who don't believe college athletes should be paid argue that they get to go to school for free. They are right, but is that really enough? College athletes are seen as professional athletes but they are not paid like them. Also, real college scholarships should comeback. Real college scholarships need to return in as if you are injured or turn out to be a bust the school cannot throw away your scholarship. Also will counter attack the question why college athletes should not be paid. College athletes are employees who are also going to school so they deserved to be paid while playing the game they love. This is relevant today because a college football team formed a union. The Northwestern Wildcats football formed a union because of the work ethic and everything they do are like work employees they stated (Sack). But unfortunately, it did not last. Problems with paying the players is they would be benefited and favored more than the “regular” students. They could spend the money foolishly like ESPN'S Colin Cowherd stated, but could also keep the students in school longer. College athletes …show more content…

Others have tried to bring new information to the NCAA that athletes are frustrated on not seeing a cent out of the billions the NCAA makes. New questions have arrived in the question if college athletes should be paid. “Real scholarships should make a comeback” (Sack.) In college, guaranteed scholarships need to make a return which if you are injured the university cannot lift the scholarship. Also you cannot transfer unless they lift the scholarship which university usually does. Even if you are a complete recruiting bust the university should not be able to lift your scholarship. This kind of question could be an alternative solution to if college athletes get

Show More
Related
2091 Words | 9 Pages

Athletes risk potentially debilitating effects to their personal lives by playing collegiate sports, according to Grand Canyon University’s article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” This problem leads to many people wondering why collegiate athletes still play sports. In the article “The Effects of Compensation for NCAA Athletes” by Mykel Kinard, he explains how the NCAA has been pocketing billions of dollars and profiting off of athletes’ NIL without allowing athletes to legally receive compensation for decades. Another reason athlete compensation is in question is because of how it’s power used to be abused. For example, in 2018, Deandre Ayton, a five-star recruit, accepted a scholarship to play at The University of Arizona.

Read More
1965 Words | 8 Pages

Do college athletes get taken advantage of by colleges and universities? Do you think that student athletes deserve to receive payment? In the past, college athletic programs’ main purpose was to provide a way for amateur athletes to gain exposure and to get recruited to a professional team. Today, with how popular the sports industry has become many question if these athletes should still be considered amateurs. This change leads to the question of whether or not college athletes should receive compensation, in addition to their scholarships, for their participation in sports.

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

Although, the NCAA has been investigating this issue for many years now, no change has been made as of yet. The college athletes are very fortunate enough to walk through their experience at college for free. Not only are they getting college for free, they also receive many benefits along with the free college. But, if the college athletes want to challenge this, a players union needs to be formed (Finkel & Martin, 2013).

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

The argument about college athletes, to pay or to not pay, has been an ongoing debate for a long period of time. The NCAA, or National College Athletics Association, was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905, with the idea of paying salaries to the athletes who were a part of this organization in mind (Top 10). But, since 1905 the NCAA has made millions and millions of dollars off of their athletes, as well as other things such as TV marketing and advertising, but still continue not to pay them because it's “against their tradition”. It may be against the long running tradition of the NCAA, but something needs to change.

Read More
2005 Words | 9 Pages

 Colleges receive millions of dollars of revenue annually.  These millions of dollars raise many questions about athletes and the part they play in this revenue. Do you think college athletes should be paid for playing college sports? College athletes should

Read More
1951 Words | 8 Pages

My wish is somehow we get back to the love of the games and simply support our athletes. I spoke of some good viewpoints and my opinion on whether college student athletes should be paid? Some, I agreed with and others I disagreed. But, the one thing that is crystal clear as a college student athlete and in D3 sports with no scholarships, playing for the love of the game—things need to change. For all those students’ athletes in made D1 and D2 college sports and are the major contributions factors of why the NCAA, universities, broadcasting companies, and marketing/branding companies make so much money.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College is a place for students to obtain a college degree and help them to get ahead on their “real world” careers. Athletic departments in college have become huge money incomes in the past ten years; college football and basketball are even shown on the television. This has resulted in many believing these athletes deserve to be paid for their contribution to the schools athletic income. However athletes in college are given the opportunity to play the sport that they love as well as receive a top education. For some players a $20,000+ per year tuition is not enough, they want to be paid with more than just a scholarship.

Read More
1895 Words | 8 Pages

An adult goes to work in the morning, usually receiving motivation to get through the day from the thought of getting paid at the end of the month. College athletes, however, go to practice every day, knowing they will get paid nothing. Everyone expects them to play for the fun of the game, but in our capitalistic world today, is that really enough? Even though college athletes are considered amateur student athletes and colleges might have a few problems with money, college athletes should be paid because they earn the colleges billions of dollars, others profit off of them, and students need the money to survive. College sports, specifically men’s football and basketball, make billions of dollars for colleges. Players help universities

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

After dissecting the dilemma of payment for college athletes, one may discover that oftentimes the only incentive college athletes receive is a full athletic scholarship to the college/university, as opposed to a salary. There must be a reason as to why the college athletes do not receive a salary even though they generate billions of dollars for the NCAA. There are numerous sources illustrating pros and cons regarding whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Some argue that athletes should be paid because they are forced to endure unhealthy environments and unfair treatment, struggle through the “plantation system”, want support for themselves, etc. Opposers of this argument state that athletes should not be paid because of financial irresponsibility, education equaling money, university offering more than education, loss of passion for the game, etc.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

Each year around the world, collegiate student-athletes participate in different sports and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. A lot of people have posed the question, should college athletes be paid? The answer to the question is that they should not get paid. The NCAA gives the student-athletes a lot of handouts that includes full-rides to any college of their choice which includes the meal plans, housing, books, and so on. If they were paid to play then they would feel as if they are professional athletes in which they are just athletes playing at the college level.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes have gained an increase in popularity over the years. The result of this is a huge increase in revenue by the NCAA and universities. The increase in revenue has sparked a debate on whether College athletes should be paid beyond their scholarships. Well, have you ever worked a full-time job? How about working a full-time job and not being compensated for the work you put, the money you make for the company, and the risks you take while doing it?

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes should be paid because the NCAA is making money off of the players. The 2013 March of Madness generated $1.15 billion dollars by ticket sales, television ads, jersey sales, and many more (Johnson and Nation). The players did not receive any of the money. This may be true, but look at all the flaws that this point has. Not each division has the powerhouse schools like Division I.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document