ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

1895 Words8 Pages

An adult goes to work in the morning, usually receiving motivation to get through the day from the thought of getting paid at the end of the month. College athletes, however, go to practice every day, knowing they will get paid nothing. Everyone expects them to play for the fun of the game, but in our capitalistic world today, is that really enough? Even though college athletes are considered amateur student athletes and colleges might have a few problems with money, college athletes should be paid because they earn the colleges billions of dollars, others profit off of them, and students need the money to survive. College sports, specifically men’s football and basketball, make billions of dollars for colleges. Players help universities …show more content…

They reason that paying college athletes would make a mockery of their education, meaning the athletes would only focus on sports and not on schoolwork. Academic work, however, is already secondary for most collegiate athletes (Gregory). In addition, one should think twice about even considering these athletes to be amateurs. Generally, players and coaches in amateur sports are unpaid or the coach is paid modestly. With college coaches’ paychecks amounting to over a million dollars in some cases, it is obvious that this “modest pay” does not apply to college athletics. Also, in amateur sports, players do not spend a great deal of time practicing because they are playing for fun, participating in simple, friendly competition, or they have work or school full time (Furth). Even though college players too have school full time in addition to their sport, they can spend anywhere from forty to sixty hours a week on football related activities (Simpson). One could not say all athletes are just playing for the love of the game with a higher goal of getting a degree either. If a star receiver would decide to focus on academics and cut back on football practice, the coach would drop him from the team and he would lose his scholarship (Furth). In this way, collegiate athletes are not

Show More
Related
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
2434 Words | 10 Pages

2019, www.theperspective.com/debates/sports/college-athletes-get-paid/. Summary: In the bottom section of this article, the author delves into a couple specific reasons why college athletes do not need or deserve compensation. Piccioto talks more about the harm that compensation for college athletes does to them, rather than the harm done to the universities. Piccioto suggests that paying college athletes takes away from what college actually is and he argues that the athletes should be treated as normal students, since they really are.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Sports writer Joe Posnanski’s article “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” argument over Dallas Morning News Editorial’s article, “paying them is fair, but it doesn't address college athletes' real need: an education” is more convincing to believe that college athletes should not be paid while receiving the benefits of a free education. DMN states that college athletes should be paid, because NCAA generate millions of income because of these players through private contracts. However, Posnanski’s claim that big time players already are paid through free college tuition, as well as covered room and board (Posnanski, 585). Even though DMN claims that college athletes go through difficult education process and may not be able to have chance to play professionally, he then correlated his source of information to the website of the NCAA, however, there is concern if this institution inflated the facts on the website (DMN). In contrast, Posnanski says argument of “College players are the reason why these schools generating so much money and they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie” is not really right.

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

Dalton Collins Berthot English III 2/24/2017 College Athletes Should Not Be Paid College athletes are given scholarships to cover their tuition and other expenses in college, so should they be paid a salary for their athletic performances as well? They are receiving something far more valuable than a chance to play college ball. They are receiving an education that will provide for them and last a lifetime. College athletes should not be paid to perform on the field or the court. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a topic that is debated more and more these days.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
1393 Words | 6 Pages

The Michigan basketball team of 1992-1993 was arguably one of the best teams in the history of college basketball. The team entered the “final four for the national championship in 92 and 93” according to NCAA website. The men quickly earned a nickname; The Fab 5. The men became “marketing targets” according to Michael Wilbon (2). The once the team started bringing in large amounts of money, they quickly realized everyone else was getting rich off their name.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. Stronger, faster, bigger athletes will generate more money. College universities generate so much revenue during the year that it is only fair to the players that they get a cut. Some people argue that college athletes have no time to work and therefore should be paid, while others contend that college athletes already receive compensation by not having to pay for college tuition.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes should receive a salary because College athletics bring in extreme amounts of revenue to universities. Through the athletes performance, labor, and image they bring in large sums of profit to these colleges therefore many believe they should be paid as seeing they are not being paid as of right now. This concept is argued about and causes some strong controversy between both sides those that support and those that oppose the concept. This controversy lies upon three main categories endorsements, salary, and the approach. This topic has become one of the main discussions in modern college athletics.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

College athletics in the United States has long been a source of pride and revenue for many universities. These athletes have profoundly impacted the world, captivating audiences worldwide and fostering a sense of unity and excitement among fans. However, the issue of whether college athletes should be paid has been a topic of heated debate. Contrary to the stance of the NCAA(National Collegiate Athletics Association), college athletes deserve compensation for their contributions to the multi-billion-dollar industry of collegiate sports, as their talents and efforts generate substantial revenue for their universities. These individuals often face financial hardships, often lack the time for part-time work and struggle with the restrictions

Read More
1842 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction In the last couple decades there has been a stir that has arised in the presence of college sports: should college athletes be paid? There are many controversial topics and discussions that takes place when talking about whether or not college athletes should be paid? The answer to this question is very difficult and will be argued continuously for many years. It has been an idea ever since sports have existed in college. These topics have many different opinions based on people’s different backgrounds, beliefs, and economic status.

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

Thesis Statement: Although paying college athletes seems unfair, it is the right thing to do because it will convince athletes to get a four year degree, they are the ones who bring money to their school, and it will teach them valuable lessons on how to manage money.  Birkenes, Adele, and Akash Bagaria. "Pay to play: Should College Athletes Be Paid?"  Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication, 6 Feb. 2012, p. 7.  Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A279613787/OVIC?u=avlr&xid=ddc324df.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Nathan Wise English II 1/2B Mrs. Barry March 10th, 2023 Why college athletes should get paid Eighty-Six percent of college athletes are below the poverty line and end up going into debt after school. Most college athletes will not have time to go to classes, practice for their sport, and spend time working at a job. This leads to them having to take out loans and going into debt. So if colleges added a way for athletes to get paid while practicing it would be very beneficial. College athletes deserve to be paid because they invest time and effort, risk injuries, and do most of the advertising for their sport.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

Many college athletes go uncompensated for the fame and profits brought to the college because of their victories, and half of the well known colleges wouldn’t be as well known as they are without their sports teams, yet they still aren’t paid for their efforts. College athletes deserve a pay because not all of them paid for their tuition, many of they got into the college that they are in now because of a scholarship. Some teams are treated like employees in a large company. “Because they are already essentially paid to play, they deserve the same rights and benefits as other employees, including medical benefits, workers' compensation when injured, and the right to use their God-given talents to build some financial security for their families while still in college.”

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Being a college athlete can be very stressful and demanding. They have to go to school and maintain their grades like non-athletes while trying to balance games, meets, and daily practices at the same time. They do not have time to work regular jobs or hours. For this reason, advocates for college athletes getting paid have come to light. However, there are many reasons that athletes should not get paid.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document