ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

2005 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: 6 reasons why college athletes should be paid

Tennessee Vols, Alabama Crimson Tide, South Carolina Gamecocks, Florida Gators are many of the powerful college sports teams in the Southeastern Conference. College students, former college students and residents of the states all chant and cheer for their teams. Year after year, these teams are celebrated and seasons are greatly anticipated. Thousands of fans spend countless dollars on team souvenirs. Football has the biggest fan base, but basketball and baseball are followed as well. Colleges receive millions of dollars of revenue annually. These millions of dollars raise many questions about athletes and the part they play in this revenue. Do you think college athletes should be paid for playing college sports? College athletes should …show more content…

Most athletes never finish their degree. Therefore, they will use the incentives to come back to finish them. Some of the money that colleges use to bring back former athletes come from tax dollars (Gerdy). Other money to bring the athletes back can come from revenue. The net cost of colleges are higher after they calculate the revenue costs (Shulman). There are some colleges that are smaller than others, but it is the bigger ones that have more money to bring back those athletes (Shulman). College athletes will still argue that they should be paid. The athletes are paid by their education (Yankah). If the athletes already have money to go to college, then they should manage their spending money. They should spend their money on the necessities to live on …show more content…

They work extremely hard to be able to play. Therefore, the athletes help bring in money for their college (Yankah). Most of the money that the athletes bring in are from sport souvenirs. The money the athletes bring in should go to help them. As a result, the money should go to the protection of the athletes. The money needs to be used to buy new equipment for the athletes. It can also be used for injured players. The athletes work so hard to play the sport they love. Therefore, colleges should be able to pay for the medical treatment with the money athletes bring in for the team. Finally, it comes to wrapping things up. In this research, there are reasons why athletes should not be paid. Colleges so way more for the athletes than they might realize. There are more than enough topics that could be covered, but these reasons are the most important. The topics that are covered are the ones that people always argue about in the real world. This paper has been very important in proving the points that were covered. The research has proved a lot about why athletes should not be paid. Therefore, do you still think college athletes should be

Show More
Related
744 Words | 3 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Many colleges, including the NCAA, believe that college athletes should not be paid. They think that college athletes should focus on getting better and on school and shouldn't have to worry about pay. The NCAA believes that paying for their college pays all on its own, when in reality, many college athletes have to schedule their school around their practice when it should be the other way around.

Read More
2095 Words | 9 Pages

The NCAA has been facing much turmoil as of late due to the many scandals and investigations recently. With more and more people watching and attending college sports, the money generated from these events has grown exponentially. As basketball and football generate the most profit for the universities, many people are starting to believe that the athletes of those sports should be receiving part of the profit. The question that many people seem to ask is should these college athletes start to get paid to play their designated sport? Some reasons on the pro side include: the end of under-the-radar recruiting by coaches, the fact that the athletes are the reason for the profits, and that the scholarships don’t cover as much as people think.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout researching the topic of college athletes being paid, I came across authors like Laura Pappano, Joe Posnanski, and Michael Rosenberg. Laura Pappano and Jose Posnanski’s argument discusses that college athletes should not be paid while Michael Rosenberg expresses the idea that the stars of these college sports should. College athletes may attend college on a scholarship, but I disagree with the arguments presented by Pappano and Posnanski. I agree with Rosenberg and believe that college athletes should be paid.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

They are already getting there school paid for or most of it paid for. (Cheong) At a lot of the bigger colleges and universities, if they are in a more favored sport, they get more than just a free education, they get the opportunity for free food, free housing, free training, depending on the sport they might also get free health insurance and if the team travels they get to travel for free. That is a pretty good deal (Ireland). Another big problem that comes up a lot with this topic is how will the athlete perform if they will be paid.

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

However, these schools are putting this money back into the programs that gained them the money("Crossfire: Hypocritical Not to Pay College Athletes?"). Another argument is that the athletes are the workhorse of the universities and deserve to be paid as they provide the profits is almost entirely false. From 1998-2008 only 6 universities made consistent profits as well as 6 more universities only making profits part of the time and the rest not making a profit most of the time("Lewis, Michael, and Bob Williams."). Also. it’s not a common thread to have the school consistently gaining money.

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

There has been a recent argument going on in the sports world that has split sports analysts all around America into two sides; those for paying college athletes and those against paying NCAA athletes. The argument has recently gained more interest after several players have tried taking a stand for the reform of college athletics. The arguments for college athletes to be paid mainly consists of what they all do for their respective universities and how much revenue they bring in. This makes athletes and certain analysts believe that theses athletes should get a cut of that big revenue they bring in with their talents. Many sports analysts would disagree however.

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

Athletes dedicate their whole lives to being a part of a college team, and much time is sacrificed in order to participate. Although some people claim that paying college athletes would detract from the academic environment

Read More
668 Words | 3 Pages

Research Paper The NCAA has generated billions of dollars every year due to their players ability to entertain and perform and they don’t get any of the money from doing so. College athletes should be getting paid because first they need income and can’t get a job because they are too busy practicing, would influence them to stay and complete college and not turn pro, and corruption would decrease. The NCAA has been debating whether or not the should start paying their college athletes. Athletes train and practice every day, It’s their job but they receive no benefits for putting in the work they do.

Read More
1706 Words | 7 Pages

Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

There is a big question going around the “sports world” right now. Should college athletes be paid? Lots of people have their own opinions about this topic, whether it be that student athletes should be paid or not. You can definitely argue both ways but college athletes should not receive a salary for playing a sport. Let’s look at the evidence that shows that student athlete salaries are an outrageous claim.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Another reason why student athletes should be paid because most of these athletes would besupporting their families. These players would be able to support members in their families andafford these they usually couldn't buy. Also feel like that these players grades would even bebetter because athletes would be more motivated to stay on the team and not flunk off the teamso they will try harder to get better grades. So with saying that I feel like students athletes should be paid because of the time and hoursthey spend on the sport and the amount of money they generate to the programs and they willbe financially stable those are some of the few reasons why i feel like college athletes should bepaid for their services in college

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

According to a 2013 USA TODAY Sports analysis, only 23 of 228 athletic departments at NCAA Division I public schools generated enough money on their own to cover their expenses in 2012. Although athletics is an essential part of the culture and attraction to a university, the revenue it brings in usually doesn’t outweigh the costs of running the programs. Colleges would not be able to pay their athletes due to the fact that they just don’t have the money. If they were to compensate their sports players, they would have to pay for all sports including the minor ones such as baseball, track and field, lacrosse, soccer, softball and volleyball. These sports are not revenue generating, so the college loses money.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

Some athletes rush to the pros and leave the university due to wanting to get paid. If pay was implemented athletes could stay longer and improve their craft as well as help the team. Some athletes rush to the pros and never pan out but if pay was added they could stay a year or 2 more and be more developed and leave with a degree. At the conclusion of this research their is many statics that show good reasoning that college athletes should have the opportunity to receive payment or some sort of salary for their play. This could lead to more students staying to get their degrees.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

If college athletes were paid, it would not be fair to the students who do not play sports and who work very hard to succeed. For example, if the athletes are paid, so should the students going to school to be lawyers, doctors, teachers, engineers, etc. The students who are going to school to have careers like that are going to help people with their future careers. No one should be paid to go to

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Open Document