ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

884 Words4 Pages

The argument about college athletes, to pay or to not pay, has been an ongoing debate for a long period of time. The NCAA, or National College Athletics Association, was founded by President Roosevelt in 1905, with the idea of paying salaries to the athletes who were a part of this organization in mind (Top 10). But, since 1905 the NCAA has made millions and millions of dollars off of their athletes, as well as other things such as TV marketing and advertising, but still continue not to pay them because it's “against their tradition”. It may be against the long running tradition of the NCAA, but something needs to change. Fairness or whatever needs to be forgotten about because in reality, everyone involved it the process 0of college athletics is on a different pay scale, except the actual athletes of course (It's Time). Meaning, due to the time and amount of dedication put in by college athletes, they should be getting paid for the …show more content…

The NCAA has made over $814 dollars in the past 10 years (Revenue). Not to mention that college athletics pulls in about $12 billion dollars a year as a whole (How Much?). Some people believe that college students shouldn't get paid by the NCAA because their schooling is getting paid for. However, that is untrue because they don't get paid anything even though they are racking up millions of dollars for their schools. Free college is not equivalent to getting paid for playing a sport but an athlete because athlete wouldn't pay extra money to go to school because their main focus is playing sports (Arguments Against). A college education tends to be worthless to an athlete into a normal student because they're more worried about their athletics, meaning, free tuition is not exactly a fair equivalent (Arguments Against). College athletes, while balancing Studies and athletics put in so much time and dedication for their school and their sports

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

In conclusion I believe that college athletes deserve to be payed some more than others. I also believe

Read More
1466 Words | 6 Pages

When collegiate sports first started they made back then does not compare to how much they make The NCAA and Universities make so much money because of the athetlets that come to their programs. The NCAA and college sports is a multi-billion dollar industry thanks to college athletes. The NCAA makes roughly about 1 billion per year since 2006 (Kirshner. 2018). Most of their money comes from television coverage and marketing campaigns. The rest comes from ticket sales and student fees.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

They claim that they cannot afford to pay college athletes when in fact that actually can. With the recent change in college football to make a four team playoff at the end of each season the NCAA will make a much larger amount of money. The NCAA doesn’t only make money off of football. They also bring in a large amount of their revenue from the men’s basketball. During the The NCAA sells the television rights to many different television networks for millions of dollars.

Read More
1604 Words | 7 Pages

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (or NCAA) is the nonprofit governing body of college athletics. Overseeing more than 1,000 member institutions and some 430,000 student athletes, varying in competition from division I, II and III, these student athletes differ in a plethora of ways, but the one commonality they share, is that none of them are paid. The NCAA is not only the singular association overseeing college athletes, but is also the executive authority of rules, regulations and eligibility of each and every college athlete. While the NCAA cannot be classified as your “typical” corporation, it exudes many of the same fundamental exploitations to which corrupt and unethical corporations conduct business, but at the expense

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) gets a very large paycheck from the very athletes that play for them, and to think that those athletes don’t even see a dime of extra pay from the NCAA. In the NCAA’s defense, they do offer and give the athletes’ their scholarship

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes should be paid because of the revenue they bring into the universities, the time they put into athletics, the jersey sales, and injuries from playing. People in today’s world have relied heavily on the entertainment of sports throughout their lifetimes. Sports are an activity that can be played at almost all ages. From a kindergartener playing soccer at recess to a retired man bowling on Wednesday

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The Paying of NCAA Student Athletes 2 Come on in, let's watch how the NCAA takes money and uses the hard working student athletes. Players have been battling for decades to get paid. The student athletes put in a-ton of training and work. But the. Again they bring in all of the revenue through their hard work and get nothing in return.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

After dissecting the dilemma of payment for college athletes, one may discover that oftentimes the only incentive college athletes receive is a full athletic scholarship to the college/university, as opposed to a salary. There must be a reason as to why the college athletes do not receive a salary even though they generate billions of dollars for the NCAA. There are numerous sources illustrating pros and cons regarding whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Some argue that athletes should be paid because they are forced to endure unhealthy environments and unfair treatment, struggle through the “plantation system”, want support for themselves, etc. Opposers of this argument state that athletes should not be paid because of financial irresponsibility, education equaling money, university offering more than education, loss of passion for the game, etc.

Read More
1167 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the past few years, countless arguments have been made regarding if college athletes should get paid. Dismissing the Name, Image, and Likeness deal (NIL) and how athletes receive compensation for that matter, they do not obtain money like a salary. Despite the fact that the athletes are the ones who agree to continue their sport at an advanced level with the knowledge of no pay, they should at least gain a slight amount of income before, during, and after their season. These athletes play for the NCAA, National College Athletic Association, and they draw in a great deal of revenue, but do not acquire the same in return along with their effort, drive, and enthusiasm. Being a college athlete is predominantly a full-time job, so if

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

Many people know or have heard about college coaches and college programs getting a lot of money after each game, in 2019 the NCAA total athletic revenue among all of the athletic departments was 18.9 billion dollars. In 2020 U.S. Congressman Mark Walker set out a bill about college athletes getting paid for their names, images, and likeness and he wished that it would be voted on in 2020 and that in 2021 it might go into effect. In the article “NCAA clears the way for athletes to profit from names, images and likenesses” Mark Walker States “ college athletes should get profit off of their names and image and likenesses because athletic programs wouldn’t have to pay so much to them and he also states that the program they play for should pay them 1,000 dollars each month to keep the players interest high. Given this evidence, it can be seen that letting college players get paid off of their names and image and likenesses would benefit them because they wouldn’t have to worry about getting another job or struggle with money problems if the NCAA would pay them 1,000 dollars each month and that could also help the program out because they wouldn’t have to worry about paying them after each game. This Proves my claim because the NCAA is paid around 18.9 billion dollars each year from the athletic department and none of that goes to the athletes that they have put their bodies on the line for the program each game and each practice and that’s unfair to them because they work so hard outside of practice and games they don’t want to worry about not having money, so when Mark Walker said that the NCAA should pay the athletes 1,000 dollars each month he is right.

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

No one believes that these athletes should be paid millions of dollars for playing the sport they are passionate about. With the NCAA making roughly $916 million in revenue monthly, they could surely afford to give each college athlete $100 a month and still turn a profit of $870 million in revenue monthly. Just a simple $100 could go a long way in ensuring that a college athlete could eat and support themselves monthly. With all of this being brought to notice, it can easily be understood that college athletes are not being treated they way they deserve and should receive some pay for their

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

College sports are among the most highly anticipated programs on national television. Especially since the turn of the century, the popularity has skyrocketed to new heights. With new exciting players that are bound for greatness, college sports are a perfect place for future stars, whether it’s in the NBA or NFL, to blossom and hone their skills. However, with this new generation of athletes come with new controversies. Maybe the most important and pressing one is “should collegiate athletes be paid?”

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

The NCAA should pay its athletes to compensate for the student athletes’ time and efforts, due to the hours they put in for their school, the class time they are deprived of, and the absurd amount of money the NCAA makes off of the athletes. This argument that i introduced and i will be arguing in favor of is very complex, but i believe there is a solution and this change should be implemented. My first point is that athletes are working more than the working man and aren't getting paid for their time. ” On average per week, student athletes spend these hours on their sport: Baseball 42.1, Basketball 39.2, Football (FBS) 43.3, Football (FCS) 41.6, Other sports 32.0” (CBS News). In comparison, the average work week in america is 40 hours.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of College Athletes Get Paid

Related Topics

Open Document