Studies have inspired an endless amount of questions, theories, solutions, all the while creating more questions. Archeologist study remains with a goal to better understand the past and to improve the future with education. Scholars are able to produce multiple interpretations of the purpose of creation using the remains of structures, literature and estelle dating. Specifically, in the article “The Ancient Temple on the Acropolis at Athens” by Gloria Ferrari encompasses various theories regarding the function and reconstruction of the ancient temple of Athena. Dinsmoor believed the structure was built to “resist intrusions that would threaten their very foundation” For instance, Dismoor supported his argument by drawing attention to the repair work on the foundation that happened after the Persian sack. This suggested remains withstood and defended the intrusion. From this, we are ables also tells us that the remains were a priority to be rebuilt. Therefore, it cost money and labour to repair the structure. For this reason, the remains are also significant to research because it allows archeologist to study the tool, materials and skills it took to create a base that provided a strong defence. Dinsmoors argument raises an intriguing point. However, the fault in this argument is there is not a sufficient amount of evidence that …show more content…
Strabo draw attention to the difference between the Parthenon and the remains of the structure. Strabo suggested xs“Erechtheum effectively replace the archaic Temple even in name and became the Temple of Athena”. He supports his theory by using a time line which involved estelle dating. The dates of the construction date to around 409 to 408, accounting for construction being done on the Acropolis. This theory can proven to be accurate as the the process of dating the artifacts and remains forms a timeline that will support the theory of an average time