ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Persuasive Essay

465 Words2 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s presidency is very much like that of a monarch. He abuses his presidential powers and forced things to go his way even if it means he has to use the military. These power-hungry qualities define him as a bad president, and good that he has done for the United States is outweighed by his cruel and unfair actions which are morally irredeemable. Firstly, during his presidency he instituted the spoils system, which he rewards his supporters with jobs. More importantly, these jobs were government positions. When he was in power he replaced 10% of government officials with people who loved him. What makes this so bad is that it was an unfair system where the government was biased in Jackson’s favor. Andrew Jackson could have appointed …show more content…

Georgia Supreme Court case. The court ruled that the Native Americans were its own individual community, so they have the right to their own territory. Andrew Jackson, however, hated this ruling. He and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which forced the Native Americans to move out of their rightful home to westward of the Mississippi, a place unfamiliar to them. Natives Americans who defied Jackson were forced out by his military, which then brought upon the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears eliminated generations of Native American families and culture all because of Andrew Jackson’s intolerance of them. His racist decisions were unforgivable. Even though Jackson may have expanded democracy by increasing the voting pool to the “common man”, he only expanded it to all white men. Which is ultimately, unimpressive since white men were already considered to be superior to everyone else. Anyone else could have opened voting to all white men and be praised for it since their opinions are already so dominant. Also, even if Jackson has weakened the upper class by vetoing the corrupted National Bank, he has done it through the abuse of his powers. In brief, the good Jackson has done was just expanding voting to more white men and abusing his powers to veto a

Show More
Related
277 Words | 2 Pages

However, president Jackson made it unpeaceful. Native Americans could migrate or stay under some conditions which later were not respected by the president. According to www.pbs.org, <>. In addition, many Native Americans lost their lives from the Trail of Tears.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Anyone who apposed him was fired. As president , his followers or supporters were called Jacksonian. The Jacksonian claimed to be the defenders of democracy, the constitution , liberty , and equality. in many ways they did inhabit characteristics of defender however in some way jackson did fail to protect the constitution and contradicted

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson did many things while he was in office; he killed the bank, helped end the nullification crisis, expanded our land, and passed the Indian removal act. All these things can be seen as a positive or negative impact on our country. I believe that killing the bank would be a positive impact because by doing it he made the majority of the population happy and it was then considered more constitutional. Killing the bank can also be seen as bad because he abused his title as president by not looking at everybody's opinion before changing the system.

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

He was notorious for giving those jobs to his friends and people that voted for him. The way that Jackson chose his other government

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever thought of the real impact Andrew Jackson had on the U.S. I think he was not the right fit for the office. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was terrible. My first point is that he abused his power and acted like a king. My second point is he caused rapid inflation and my final point is he spoiled people with jobs.

Read More
980 Words | 4 Pages

#3 Jackson saw everyone as equal and did not favored just a small group of aristocratic or bureaucratic social class. He helped the people that supported him, therefore, he accomplished what he promised to his followers. Moreover, Andrew Jackson's excuse for the spoils system was that it is "better to bring

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

Document 3 of National Bank Controversy is Daniel Webster’s reply to Jackson Message. He explains that Jackson is always against always having a higher class in charge. He also says Jackson Is always under the impression that under the higher classes' rule liberty will always fall. These two documents show that Jackson believed in the social and political views and equality of all people. He wanted others to have chances even if it meant implying that liberty may fall under the higher class.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

During Andrew Jackson’s time in office, he did a neutral job as president. He had his ups and downs, including how he handled Native Americans and the national bank. Overall, I think Andrew Jackson’s presidency wasn’t that bad nor that good due to how he handled some issues. Andrew Jackson wasn’t that bad a person as people may think, he was even nicknamed, “a man of the people”. He had gotten this nickname for letting the people be heard, Andrew Jackson grew up like a “normal” person.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

When it comes to Andrew Jackson’s time as president, there are differing opinions. I believe he did not do a good job during his time as president, even though his popularity grew significantly. Andrew Jackson’s presidency was not so good because of his treatment of Native Americans, and the two major problems which were the nullification crisis and bank war. Andrew Jackson’s treatment of Native Americans during his presidency was undeniably harmful and unfair. His policies, such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830, forcibly relocated thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, leading to vast suffering and loss of life.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

The president would give jobs and claim that swapping out the members of government was necessary because it allowed for no person to be in a government position for long. Holding the power given to them for a long time would corrupt their values and make them go against the “honest performance of their duties” mentioned in document 5 But he only hired those who supported him which meant that most of the people put in charge of these jobs to perform their duties were not qualified, undoubtedly putting the country's safety in jeopardy. Furthermore, the fact that Andrew Jackson only offered jobs to those who supported him, means that they would never have had any real reason to disagree with his actions unless they were to change their opinion of him all of a sudden but with him swapping out members of government constantly. Jackson would have already had somebody who was him lined up to replace the one, not in favor of him.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

He had a harsh temper and his personality was just not fit to be in the position of president. Jackson was said to be better for the Army and military and that he just wasn’t really capable of the duties of being president. He even said himself that he was not quite made for president. “I know what I am fit for. I can command a body of men in a rough way, but I am not fit to be president.”

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

In the article Worchester v Georgia from pbs.org is says in the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia conducted a relentless campaign to remove the Cherokees. Then Marshall Worcester took Georgia to court. Congress voted in favor of Worcester. So technically no one could move them off their land. Andrew Jackson didn't listen to congress and when the Indian removal act was passed, he moved them off their land.

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

However harmless this may seem, he wanted to gain favoritism from the lower class by making it seem like he was doing good for them. But he was powering over the whole bank because of his high status, making his actions not democratic. Backing this up and arguing against Jackson's decision, Daniel Webster's response tells us that; "[Jackson’s message] extends the grasp of [the President] over every power of the government..raises a cry that liberty is in danger, at the very moment when it puts forth claims to powers heretofore unknown and unheard of"(Doc B). As Daniel Webster explained, Jackson is abusing his high

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Although times are different now, newspapers and websites alike would agree that Jackson was a cruel and unfit president. In this paper, I will seek to persuade you to look at history for yourself and make your own conclusions. While he did some inexcusable mistakes such as relocating the Indians, Jackson was as a suitable president for the following three reasons: he held the unstable union together, encouraged expansion into

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s presidency had a negative impact on the United States. He could be considered a villain. Andrew Jackson treated Native Americans in a very brutal way. He forcefully removed them from his claimed territory on the trail of tears. Due to the terrible conditions, many Indians died on the journey west.

Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Persuasive Essay

Open Document