ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Doesn T Kill People

713 Words3 Pages

Drugs are illegal, yet criminals still find their way to abuse drugs. Therefore, making guns illegal will not stop criminals from being able to get guns. Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety. Stricter gun laws would make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and families. Gun control laws, like laws to try to ban assault rifles, go against the right to own guns for hunting and sport. Crimes will never stop; guns do not cause crimes; people cause them. If citizens do not have anything to protect themselves, criminals will just kill them. Gun control will not stop anything because criminals will not obey the law, guns do not kill people, and it will just take guns out of good …show more content…

According to a 2004 study by Linda Dahlberg, just having a firearm in a home increases the risk of a homicide or a suicide to occur. That risk remains no matter how many guns are owned or how safely they are locked away in a gun safe (10 Advantages and Disadvantages of Gun Control 2). People living in a home with a firearm present face a risk of homicide that is forty times higher than people in a home without a firearm. The risk of a firearm-related suicide is 90 times higher when a gun is present in a home. Making guns illegal or taking away guns won’t do anything but increase more crime and more deaths because people won’t have a way to defend themselves. Gun control laws would actively break the terms of the right to self-defense and it would also deny people a sense of safety. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense two point five million times a year, the police cannot protect everyone all of the time. Fifty one percent of men and fifty six percent of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would ‘make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and families’ (ProCon.org 3). When people own guns it gives them a sense of safety because they can protect themselves with said

Show More
Related
226 Words | 1 Pages

stricter gun laws are not needed in the united states. One argument is , if guns were outlawed criminals would still find ways to arm themselves. Gun control laws won’t stop mass shootings. Most shootings are from criminals that want to kill people like gangs kill people because they don't give them the drugs.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Mental Health is a bigger issue than guns, and mental health will be regulated and not guns if the authority and the government want killings to stop occurring. Taking away guns will not stop killings with guns. People will find other ways to kill people, because people if they want to kill, will kill. Some argue that the guns need to be taken away because guns take away Innocent people’s lives. However, the real reason people are killed by guns is that of the people using the gun.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Criminals do not get gun or weapons legally in the first place so adding extra gun laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining weapons. Gun laws prevent normal citizens from protect themselves and their families. When criminals obtain guns and weapons, they are not getting them from legal channels. The criminals steal them or buy them illegally on the streets. Sometimes people who

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Although guns have been used to harm, injure, and kill our fellow brothers and sisters, gun control laws should not be enacted. Gun laws are the regulation of the selling, owning, and use of guns. We as a nation are built on the freedom of not being controlled by the government. When more and more gun laws are enacted, more and more of our freedom is taken away. Slowly our nation will crumble and fall beneath us.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, why won’t people agree with gun control if it will help reduce crimes? Gun control has been an important topic for the past few years. According to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

Having strict gun control laws would prevent civilians from protecting themselves against attackers and invaders. While there is a call for strict gun control laws it is impossible for the law makers and law enforcers to protect everyone all the time so having this in place prevents a person from his own protection. Gun ownership allows persons to be protected and this is not something gun control does effectively. The Pew Research Center, which is well known for conducting numerous types of research, has conducted many surveys on this issue and one important trend noticed is that there is more support by Americans for gun rights when compared to gun control. Based on interviews done, 52% of the persons said it was more important to protect

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

On average 96 Americans are killed with guns every day and more than 100,000 people in America are shot in murders. We must need Gun Control. The one who is a con for Gun Control says “If gun control laws were made much more strict, these criminals would still be able to obtain illegal weapons. The only difference would be that the people who are not criminals would not have the ability to defend themselves” but if we eliminate the gun control, the murder case will increase greatly.

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

Although gun control advocates believe there should be gun control to reduce crime, guns should not be controlled by law because it will violate the second amendment of the constitution, more guns have reduced crime and not less guns, and gun control goes against one’s natural right to defend themselves. First off, if more gun controls enforced, it will begin to violate one of the amendments as a United States citizen. The second amendment in the United States

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

Though stopping gun violence would be wonderful, it’s an ideal that America can no longer conquer. Too many citizens would disobey new laws to ban guns from our citizens’ grasp. Riots would arise, and illegal trades would become all the more frequent. But, there are solutions that could decrease the amount of gun violence within our country.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control laws may restrict these people who are responsible from defending themselves. So honestly gun control contradicts itself as much as it helps. For starters does gun laws really deter crime. No, honestly gun control does not deter crime in all cases.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.

Read More
289 Words | 2 Pages

One reason more gun control laws wouldn't work is because people are the problem not the guns. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Gun control doesn't need to be more strict we just need better laws. We should have better security in public areas.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Doesn T Kill People

Related Topics

Open Document