ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Not The Answer

715 Words3 Pages

Gun Control is Not the Answer Increasing gun control will not decrease crime, but changing the ways in which we punish the crimes will. When you think about crime the first thing that comes to mind is gun control. However, there are already numerous laws on the books that are not being followed. Criminals do not follow the laws and that is the problem. The punishments for crimes do not fit the bill and criminals figure even if they get caught the punishment really is not that bad so they may as well do the crime. Criminals do not get gun or weapons legally in the first place so adding extra gun laws will not prevent criminals from obtaining weapons. Gun laws prevent normal citizens from protect themselves and their families. When criminals obtain guns and weapons, they are not getting them from legal channels. The criminals steal them or buy them illegally on the streets. Sometimes people who …show more content…

Having background checks are good to prevent violent offenders from buying weapons but there again it does not prevent them from getting weapons. It may slow down the process but it does not eliminate the process. With the long wait times for citizens to receive their guns the criminals are receiving their weapons quicker and have an advantage over the law abiding citizens. Gun control laws actually help criminals. The criminals know that citizens have to wait to get their guns. They also know what kind of weapons the people are allowed to have and which they are not. This puts the advantage in the criminals hands. If the criminals know what they are up against they can prepare. The citizens have no idea what to expect from the criminal. Since criminals obtain weapons off the streets there is no telling what they may or may not have. This makes it very dangerous for people and it also makes it hard to protect yourself in an unknown

Show More
Related
908 Words | 4 Pages

A criminal will always have a weapon and a way to get more weapons, criminals do not follow the law. In Chicago, they have some of the strictest gun laws in America, but the shootings still increase; they have had at least 141 people shot and over 40 deaths since the start of 2018. No

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

I don’t want more crime just because people have stricter gun laws. Taking away guns may cause people to go to other ways of committing violent crimes. I also think if we have don’t have more gun control laws, then gun deaths would reduce dramatically. American children under age 15 were nine times more likely to die of a gun accident than children in other advanced wealthy countries. About 200 Americans go to emergency rooms every day with gunshot wounds (Frum).

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

Though criminals are thrown off from households by guns, but they can also be deterred from companies by guns. If gun control continues to get tighter and tighter, we will have nothing left to scare off those criminals.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

When in reality guns are almost never used to help save people. 0.79% of people used a gun in self defense but that is nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands of people who died from guns every year. The overall crime rate could go down if there are no guns allowed at all. So no one would really have to worry about using a firearm in self defense against a crime in the first place. A lot of gun supporters would argue that taking away

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

There is no reason to completely take away guns from people, criminals will still find a way.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

I understand that if everybody had a firearm it would raise the murder rate tremendously, but one must admit  should be a little harder to get a gun, just cause you don’t have a criminal background does not mean you are not capable of doing the same actions a criminal. The gun control law should be made to where if you wanted  to purchase a firearm, that you

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
2067 Words | 9 Pages

Gun control is good, but the country should focus on the laws that already exist. If we would focus and follow the laws that are in place now we would have less crime happen. Wrecks that cause fatality happen 75 percent more often than accidents involving guns(Owning guns). We can stop all gun crime if we become more strict with the laws and rules of owning a gun. We need to enforce better rules such as: doing more background checks on both buyers and sellers, getting people to go through a legal gun dealer, and removing all gun trafficking.

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

While I used a more philosophical way to answer the question in the title, the article itself is filled with data tables that provide similar answers. Gun control has a negligible effect on gun crime itself. If you make obtaining a weapon difficult, people will turn to illegal methods to obtain a weapon when living in an area plagued by crime. Thereby increasing gun crime to a point where more gun control is being issued. The data in this article proves that gun control laws do relatively nothing in solving this

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Bans on guns are ineffective and even though they are done, background checks should be more strict and thorough. Bans on guns actually cause more violent crime. In 1976, Washington DC banned all handguns for private and public use. In the years ensuing, “...armed crime rates skyrocketed” (Lapierre, 2009). This ban causing rise of crime earned Washington DC’s nickname the “Murder Capital.”

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control laws may restrict these people who are responsible from defending themselves. So honestly gun control contradicts itself as much as it helps. For starters does gun laws really deter crime. No, honestly gun control does not deter crime in all cases.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

The process of obtaining a gun is defective allowing the mentally ill and people with criminal history to obtain a firearm. Making a long waiting-period and enforcing deeper background checks, would reduce the amount of violence with guns. It would make it more difficult for minors, people with psychological issues, and criminal records to obtain a gun. This process would not stop those who want a gun to obtain one, but it would help a majority of the problem. Although strengthening gun control will not stop those from obtaining a gun, they can still finds way to obtain a gun.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

First, it needs to be determined if gun control has any effect on crime whatsoever. One way of controlling the access to guns is waiting periods. The anti-gun crowd believe that waiting periods act as a buffer between an emotionally unstable person and the immediate access of a gun. This cooling off period can be used to deter an emotionally unstable person from committing a crime of passion by allowing time to pass and letting them think about the situation and come back to their senses. However, logic dictates that a person who is in a blind rage will use whatever is available to them at the immediate moment to commit a crime.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Not The Answer

Open Document