ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

1044 Words5 Pages

First, it needs to be determined if gun control has any effect on crime whatsoever. One way of controlling the access to guns is waiting periods. The anti-gun crowd believe that waiting periods act as a buffer between an emotionally unstable person and the immediate access of a gun. This cooling off period can be used to deter an emotionally unstable person from committing a crime of passion by allowing time to pass and letting them think about the situation and come back to their senses. However, logic dictates that a person who is in a blind rage will use whatever is available to them at the immediate moment to commit a crime. They would not calmly go into a gun store, purchase a gun and then go back and finish the job. A study that was performed by Jens Ludwig, PhD of the Georgetown Public Policy Institute at Georgetown University and Philip J. …show more content…

They believe this is where the federal government should step in. Regardless of where the laws come from, whether it be federal, state or local, crime tends to pop up when gun laws take hold of an area. This explains why the major cities who have strict gun laws tend to have higher crime rates than their surrounding areas where their city laws do not have jurisdiction. In 1982, Chicago political leaders imposed gun control aimed at handguns as the answer to help stem the tide of crime. The city of Chicago saw their violent crime increase due to the fact that it was illegal for its citizens to defend themselves. Washington D.C., which has been dubbed our "murder capital", saw its unacceptable rate of murder (188 murders in 1976) rise almost 100% from the year they passed the handgun ban in 1976 to 1988 (369 murders). It continued to rise into the 1990’s where the number of murders in 1993 reached

Show More
Related
1037 Words | 5 Pages

If you recollect about it, this really should be an anticipated effect of gun control, though most people don 't remember far enough past the words "gun" and "control" to see it. When you do give up and recollect about it though, the criminals who are committing crimes at present are the ones still making this a relevant issue of discussion in the foremost position. They are the aces who are either getting access to certain weapons that are already illegal and/or the ones who are using legal weapons illegally. If it weren 't for them disregarding laws and causing these crime rates to fail up, gun control would not still be in

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

I don’t want more crime just because people have stricter gun laws. Taking away guns may cause people to go to other ways of committing violent crimes. I also think if we have don’t have more gun control laws, then gun deaths would reduce dramatically. American children under age 15 were nine times more likely to die of a gun accident than children in other advanced wealthy countries. About 200 Americans go to emergency rooms every day with gunshot wounds (Frum).

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control is and will be beneficial to America’s security and safety. The US has been seen to be drastically more unsafe than other countries with stronger gun laws. “Gun violence is a crisis. 117,000 Americans are shot every year, a rate that outpaces our peer by order of magnitude” (Gun Laws Matter).

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

The implementation of stricter gun laws will not terminate crime. Washington, D.C. has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the country to live. Criminals that seek to harm others do not obey laws. Changing the laws of a country or the making of new ones does not get rid of the problem. Adding more rules and regulations could create larger problems that do not involve guns, but instead, other types of weapons.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

Weapon control supporters would contend this data by saying that the insights are misdirecting, and that it is important to consider different factors, for example, the changing of times and in addition the ascent of medication and group brutality. They may have a point, yet as Washington, D. C.’s “kill rate expanded by 73%, whatever is left of the United States all in all accomplished a 11% reduction in murders” (Agresti and Smith, 2010). This is troublesome for them to clarify. A moment outline of the insufficiency of forbidding handguns is that of Chicago, Illinois. In 1982, Chicago passed a restriction on all handguns, aside from those that were pre-enrolled with the police division preceding the boycott.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Did you know that the US is third in the world in murders? If you don’t count Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, St. Louis, and Washington D.C. then the US would be 189th out of 193 countries. However, all five of those cities have very strict gun control laws. You may think that gun control helps, but it really doesn't. A study shows that in the past as more people owned guns, the crime rate has gone down.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control has been a huge topic and debate ever since the 1999 shooting at Columbine High School and shows no sign of dying down anytime soon. While gun control laws do lessen the amount of gun related crimes, more still needs to be done to further such crimes. Things such as implementing laws that target the dangerous people who commit these crimes, giving more power and funds to the police and other crime preventing units, and by restricting gun access for people who have had previous violent offenses. Jake Novak and Lois Beckett write two well thought out articles on how to deal with gun control in the US. While the two articles do have similarities in how they do both have reasons as to why gun control isn’t the answer in some cases, they both represent different ideas.

Read More
1244 Words | 5 Pages

Although Chicago has “some of the strictest gun laws” in the country in 2016, four thousand people were found victim of gun related crime. Between 2015 and 2016 gun homicides within the city rose by an astounding 61 percent, particularly huge compared to other Cities ( 25.1 per 100,000 residents) while (14.1 per 100,000) in Philadelphia and only (2.3 per 100,000 ) in New york (Kurtzleben 1). States around Chicago have relatively low scores on the grade scale from the law center to prevent gun violence. Sixty percent of new guns used in chicago gang-related crimes and 31.6 percent used in non gang-related crimes between 2009 and 2015 were bought in different states. State lines don’t stop guns, gun

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Although mass shootings have greatly increased from 2001, bring in stricter gun laws is not a simple solution(Schmidt 2014). Throughout the years statics show that despite the fact that bring stricter gun laws seems like a good idea, it is often worse for the community. For example, California is known for its very strict gun laws, ranking at number one in the US, and this is a key factor to why crime rates are some of the highest in the country (Hartvigsen 2013). Statistics also show that from 1993 to 2013 guns per person has arisen and gain control per person has lowered (perry

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

Gun Control “During the period in which Chicago’s handgun ban was effective (1982 to 2010), 59% of all murders in Chicago were committed with handguns (data unavailable for 2000 to 2002),” (“Gun Control”, Par. 20). Chicago is considered one of the most strict of places when it comes to gun laws and the funny thing about this statistic is that, before Chicago implemented this ban, 48% of all murders were committed with handguns. Gun control as a whole has been one of the most controversial topic of today's world. Some people think that there is too much gun control and some people think there is too little gun control.

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document