ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

949 Words4 Pages

A huge debate going on now of days is the debate about gun laws.
Some people think that there should be stricter gun laws, while others think they don't need stricter gun laws and that they have a right to own guns. Overall it is very clear that more laws need to be in place. If we had strong laws against guns the overall number of deaths by gun will go down. Also guns are almost never used for self defense so saying that guns save lives is false. The thing that is most shocking is the fact that most guns used in crimes are legally owned guns that were stolen. Guns shouldn't be with in homes and that fact is undeniable.
More laws against guns would decrease the number of gun-related deaths. For example in one source it shows information about …show more content…

In fact guns are not used in self defense often, according to Gun Control pro con arguments it states that. “Guns are rarely used in self defense of the 29,618,300 violent crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.79% of the victims protected themselves with a threat or use of firearm. The least employed protective behavior.” This just shows that gun are not saving lives. A lot of gun supporters argue self defense as a huge reason why they should be able to own guns. When in reality guns are almost never used to help save people. 0.79% of people used a gun in self defense but that is nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands of people who died from guns every year. The overall crime rate could go down if there are no guns allowed at all. So no one would really have to worry about using a firearm in self defense against a crime in the first place. A lot of gun supporters would argue that taking away …show more content…

One of my sources show that guns that are legal can still be used for evil, it says that. “Legally owned guns are frequently stolen and used by criminals. A june 2013 institute of medicine (IOM) report states that “‘almost all guns used in criminal acts enter circulation via initial legal transactions.”’ This just shows there should be stricter gun laws because even guns that are bought legally still end up getting used for a crime. Sure while these guns were stolen still if there were no guns in the first place it never would have happen. Most guns are stolen and used for crime so don't let just anyone own a gun. So the overall crime rate will lower due to the fact it's harder for people to get there hands on a gun which is beneficial to everyone. (Should More Gun Control Laws Be

More about The Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Open Document