ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

949 Words4 Pages

A huge debate going on now of days is the debate about gun laws.
Some people think that there should be stricter gun laws, while others think they don't need stricter gun laws and that they have a right to own guns. Overall it is very clear that more laws need to be in place. If we had strong laws against guns the overall number of deaths by gun will go down. Also guns are almost never used for self defense so saying that guns save lives is false. The thing that is most shocking is the fact that most guns used in crimes are legally owned guns that were stolen. Guns shouldn't be with in homes and that fact is undeniable.
More laws against guns would decrease the number of gun-related deaths. For example in one source it shows information about …show more content…

In fact guns are not used in self defense often, according to Gun Control pro con arguments it states that. “Guns are rarely used in self defense of the 29,618,300 violent crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.79% of the victims protected themselves with a threat or use of firearm. The least employed protective behavior.” This just shows that gun are not saving lives. A lot of gun supporters argue self defense as a huge reason why they should be able to own guns. When in reality guns are almost never used to help save people. 0.79% of people used a gun in self defense but that is nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands of people who died from guns every year. The overall crime rate could go down if there are no guns allowed at all. So no one would really have to worry about using a firearm in self defense against a crime in the first place. A lot of gun supporters would argue that taking away …show more content…

One of my sources show that guns that are legal can still be used for evil, it says that. “Legally owned guns are frequently stolen and used by criminals. A june 2013 institute of medicine (IOM) report states that “‘almost all guns used in criminal acts enter circulation via initial legal transactions.”’ This just shows there should be stricter gun laws because even guns that are bought legally still end up getting used for a crime. Sure while these guns were stolen still if there were no guns in the first place it never would have happen. Most guns are stolen and used for crime so don't let just anyone own a gun. So the overall crime rate will lower due to the fact it's harder for people to get there hands on a gun which is beneficial to everyone. (Should More Gun Control Laws Be

Show More
Related
226 Words | 1 Pages

stricter gun laws are not needed in the united states. One argument is , if guns were outlawed criminals would still find ways to arm themselves. Gun control laws won’t stop mass shootings. Most shootings are from criminals that want to kill people like gangs kill people because they don't give them the drugs.

Read More
293 Words | 2 Pages

Equally important, those who cannot legally buy guns will steal from legal gun owners’ homes. This makes the legal gun owners look as if they helped produce the crime and obtaining guns from other illegal channel. Gun control laws can prevent criminals from stealing guns, changing the right of the carrying gun laws and this can be the solution. In the meantime, it reduces the sponsorship of gun-related crimes. Nevertheless, the opponent believes gun regulation laws still couldn’t be able to prevent the criminals from obtaining guns.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

To begin with, if people want to get ahold of a gun and commit evil crimes with it, they can and will if it is their desire. Laws are not going to stop people from using guns unlawfully. Growing up, I did not live in a dangerous area, but I had cousins who did. I looked at a website, and it showed the following A site that I looked up gives this statistic, “a 1997 U.S. Department of Justice survey found that 8.4% of state prison inmates who used or possessed a firearm during the offense for which they were incarcerated obtained the gun from the illegal market” (Giffords). This shows that despite all of the laws protecting us from guns, the laws do not necessarily work.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Ever since the shooting that took place in Florida, and took the life of 17 students, there had been multiple debates over gun laws. As a result of weak gun laws, it’s been easier for people to get their hands on guns. There are two sides to this debate, one side argues that there should be stricter gun laws, while the other side argues that the current gun laws should stay the same. At the end of the day, I side with stricter gun laws. My first reason to why we should have stricter gun laws is, guns are very menacing and should not be authorized on the streets.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
1316 Words | 6 Pages

"A large percentage of gun owners rely on their firearms for personal defense" (McClurg, Kopel, and Dennning 1) Imagine if an intruder broke in and there were no weapons in the house, things would go a lot differently with the homeowner armed, potentially saving their family's life. An example "A 13-year-old South Carolina boy fatally shot one burglary suspect and scared off a second with his mother's gun" (Ortiz NBC News" would the family have survived if their wasn’t a gun available in the home or if he wasn't trained for use of firearms? Should there be a limitation though, should the allowed defensive force be based upon the threat against them, either way every family deserves to sleep sound at night knowing that they could fight back in any situation thrown at them. Crime has skyrocketed in the last century, could guns be to blame or possibly the economy, one thing is certain, as much as our society has changed and everyone seems to want the best of everything without having to work for it the blame cannot be put onto any single target, but a mixture of all factors.

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

According to Newstimes, only 1% of crimes committed with a firearm are by a licensed owner and 78% of all firearm committed crimes are by unlicensed illegal weapons. Firearms that are used in crimes are usually not bought legally like most people think. That's why many say we need stronger background checks or make it harder to buy a gun, but we don't, that would only make it harder for good citizen to get a firearms when they choose. Building off the topic of criminal getting firearms, people ignore, or don't know the amount of crimes stopped every year with guns. Based on victim reports, “Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense,” according to the Gun Owners of America Fact Sheets.

Read More
174 Words | 1 Pages

Making it harder for people to get guns is just not fair to the people that collect guns or just use the guns for hunting/sport. Also many people only own guns for self defense and to make them feel safe. Making new laws won't

Read More
1483 Words | 6 Pages

Guns need to have stricter laws! Guns have obviously caused a dramatic rise the crime rate in the United States. An example is the killing enormous Sandy Hook school massacre that happen in the year of 2012, only four years ago. Another one is the San Bernardino shooting with reference to fourteen lives taken and twenty-one others injured (Karimi). These massacres did not happen with knives but the lives of little children, dads, moms, and just citizens of the United States were taken with guns.

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

In 2011 the FBI collected data showing that firearms were used in 68% murders, 41% robberies, and 21% aggravated assaults (National Institute of Justice). If we had more or better restrictions on guns then the percentage of murders, robberies, and assaults would be lower. There are over 10,000 homicides committed with firearms (National Institute of Justice). People use guns for bad/evil so there should be restrictions. Studies have shown that most U.S. homicides are committed with handguns (National Institute of Justice).

Read More
673 Words | 3 Pages

Some people like to believe that you can stop deaths involving guns, by making gun control laws stricter. Stricter gun control laws will not reduce crime any better than the current gun control laws. Undoubtedly, stricter gun control laws will not reduce crime because criminals will get their hands on guns either way. Criminals will use many ways to obtain illegal firearms. According to a study from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, they found many cases where two people will go to a gun store, one will pick out a gun, and the other will use his identification to buy the gun (Dan Noyes online).

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

Often times legally purchased guns are stolen and used in crimes. The key to protecting our democracy is not by having armed citizens, but by having informed citizens. Semi-automatic weapons are intended for only military use and have absolutely no business in the hands of civilians for either self-defense or sport. Gun control reduces the financial burden on society. Gun control could help protect women from their abuser.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Gun Control Although many mass shootings have re-started the debate on gun control, fewer people believe that gun laws should be made stricter. Some people use guns in horrible ways, but other people use guns to prevent horrible things from happening to them. The reasons we don’t need stricter gun laws are self defense, violating the second amendment, and criminals and mentally ill will get guns regardless.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Related Topics

Open Document