ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Confederate Flag

690 Words3 Pages

The Confederate flag represents different meanings, for different people. Not all the meanings are good, and not all of them are true. Some people may view the flag as a representation of racism, and a harsh time period for African Americans. However, that was not the intended meaning for the Confederate flag. Other people view the flag as an important symbol of our history and the past, that should not be taken away or destroyed. The Confederate flag and other memorials relating to the flag and army, are a part of our past whether people like it or not. Banning the flag would just be trying to block out part of history, that we cannot change. By ignoring the past, repeating it is inevitable. Therefore, it only makes sense to embrace the flag …show more content…

The memorials are an important symbol to the soldiers’ families. Taking the memorials down would be disrespecting the sacrifices they made for their country and beliefs. Everyone has different beliefs, and everyone should be able to celebrate those beliefs freely. Public places such at schools and parks should not be renamed just because people believe its racist. However, they can be renamed after more recent historic heroes, if the community feels the need too. Historic landmarks are here to honor history and the people who made it possible. Schools such as Robert E. Lee high school have the right to be named after him. He was a war hero for the confederacy, and he deserves the right to be honored even if not everyone can see that or agree with what he did for this country. If other people groups can have up monuments that not everyone agrees with, then the south and confederates should be able to also. Since people such as Martin Luther King Jr are allowed to have statues up and them not be taken down, then people like Robert E. Lee should be able to as well. By taking down the monuments all we are doing is destroying the past, but we will never be able to destroy history and what happened in

Show More
Related
750 Words | 3 Pages

A monument that is not desired will not be effective or honored such as the Crazy Horse Memorial in South Dakota. People have to favor a monument being put in place in order for it to work. An example of this would be the Crazy Horse Memorial sculpture being developed in South Dakota. Lawrence Downes argues in Source C (Downes), “The Crazy Horse Memorial has some of the same problems: it is most definitely an unnatural landmark. Some of the Indians I met in South Dakota voiced their own misgivings, starting with the fact that it presumes to depict a proud man who was never captured in a photograph or drawn from life.”

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

It is true that most monuments honor historical moments, however, the way that these memorials are placed can affect certain groups of people. For instance, in an article from The New York Times titled “Waiting for Crazy Horse,” Lawrence Downes rises the issues regarding location, not only with the Crazy Horse memorial, but also with Mount Rushmore. Downs first explains his position on the placement of Mount Rushmore: “I have to admit: Mount Rushmore bothers me. It was bad enough that white men drove the Sioux from the hills they still hold sacred; did they have to crave faces all over them too?” Most people can agree that the treatment of Native Americans in this country is certainly not the best, but Downes does make a good point that not only is it disrespectful that a group of people were forced off land that held important to them, but that the faces that represent the people who caused them an immense amount of suffering are “graffitied” on their land.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

At first, it was used during Civil war battles and was a memorial to fallen soldiers who had died fighting for their independence. If this was how it was received now, no one would have a problem with it, but as time went on, the perception of the flag started to change. In the 1940s, a Dixiecrat party was formed and they used the flag as a symbol to support segregation. Confederate heritage organizations tried to protect the flag from misuse by having several Southern states pass laws to penalize “desecration” of the flag, but this did not help. Confederate heritage groups lost control of the flag and its real

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Some argue that the flag represents the southern heritage and the pride shown through the individual state. Others argue that it is a symbol of slavery and racism throughout the state. (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/22/charleston-killings-confederate-flag-debate) Either way, the flag causes controversy and in my opinion, it should be taken down. My supposition of the flag being down or staying up is that the Mississippi flag should be taken down.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

It expresses the people who have died fighting for our country and Franklin D. Roosevelt who fought for freedom of speech and worship and the freedom from want and fear. This monument is here to remind us to be grateful of the brave individuals who fought on behalf of our community and the fact that we are free Americans, thanks to President Roosevelt. It is interesting to see the relation of the lists of people on the towers from so long ago to the East Tennessee counties that we all live in today. The Athenian monument, with its list of people and their tribe, shows how proud Athens is of the ones who died in the fight to protect Athens, which is similar to the pride that the people of Tennessee have for the ones who have died and are now named on the East Tennessee Veteran Memorial.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

Did the victors that bled and died demand the removal and complete ban of their vanquished foe’s symbols and memorials, NO!. I think those of us who did not pay the price they did can learn from that example, unless some new progressive generation comes along and thinks it knows better than those who fought and died there, and rewrites the history, primarily TO MAKE THEMSELVES FEEL BETTER. "The Confederates

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

A lot of people may not advocate the removal of the confederate monuments, but the problem is, they aren't opposed to it either. To people, the confederate soldier statues and monuments represent people protecting slavery. But confederate soldier statues and monuments represent individuals, soldiers fighting for

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

Though I do agree that confederate history should be preserved, these statues aren’t historical artifacts because none of them were built during or around the Civil war. A real historical artifacts would be a confederate uniform or a flag from the war. The only reason why many of them were erected was that of lost cause movement. The United Daughters of the Confederacy lead this social movement and their main objective was to rewrite confederate history in school textbooks (Coleman Lowndes). They glorified confederate heroes, made it seem as enslaved people were happy and that slavery wasn’t the reason why the civil war happened (Coleman Lowndes).

Read More
169 Words | 1 Pages

To begin with, Confederate statues, flags, and monuments has been the history of our country so the people and the future generation can see what America have dealt with to be where we are at. In the United States, the statues and monuments are representation of historic mark as they are important part of the US history. The monuments are very significant as it symbolizes history and some of those monuments are being removed. For example, a monument of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was removed in Maryland. One man stated that, "It has become increasingly clear in recent weeks that memorials such as this are hurtful to many residents in our community and elsewhere” (County “Here are the Confederate memorials that will be removed after Charlottesville”).

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

Moreover, memorials dedicated to the Civil Rights Movement serve as powerful reminders of pivotal moments in the fight for equality. These memorials help preserve history, educate future generations, and work towards healing and reconciliation by acknowledging past injustices and striving to prevent them from reoccurring. Historical monuments represent our country’s history, taking them down is to censor, whitewash, and potentially forget that

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

The United States has done many things in the past that everyone now wishes they could take back in a blink of an eye. In the articles “Images of hate: Nazi and Confederate flags in defeat faced different fate” (by Matthew Schofield) and “PRO/CON: should cities remove Confederate monuments?” (by Mitch Landrieu) they describe why hate symbols are truly terrible to see especially if a person went through a time with a certain hate symbol. The articles go more in-depth with why some people want to erase the past by removing and renaming certain buildings and statues that teach us about slavery and the civil war or some other historic event that happened.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

These places are more than just another location; They are what makes america who she is today. WIthout these monuments, how will future generations learn about the place they call home and how will they learn about the struggle it took to get there? The nation should prioritize in protecting what people have left of their past. Not only should the nation protect these monuments but americans should to. They need to stand up for the future of their descendants and protect the nation’s parks, monuments, and historical

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Should monuments be removed? For many years people have been arguing whether certain controversial monuments, such as statues, should be destroyed or removed. A common type of monuments in this situation are the Confederacy monuments. These are various statues across the US which honor Confederate leaders or “heroes”. Many see these offensive since those people basically oppressed African Americans for years and were fighting to keep doing so.

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

The killing of nine black church members during a Bible study in Charleston changed that sentiment, reigniting calls to bring down Confederate flags and symbols across the nation. By taking down the flag the power that stood with it comes down as well. Taking the flag down shows that the flag no longer is needed because African-Americans are just as equal as a white person. At the confederate memorial there was all types of people who attended, but some weren’t there to support the taking down of the flag. There were a few gray-haired white men at the front of the crowd waving confederate flags.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Confederate Flag

Open Document