A subject of debate for years, centuries even, has been that of Creation versus Evolution. Which one outweighs the other? Which is most heavily supported by scientific evidence? Many have mulled over the idea of One omnipotent God miraculously creating the world we live in today, modeling it according to His perfect plan. Others stand firm in the belief of a phenomena of space and matter where earth was brought into existence by a spectacular “big bang,” causing entire planets, ecosystems, and life forms to materialize from nothing. Men of God and of science have made claims supporting both arguments, pulling up fossilized fragments of history, running innumerable tests, and spending countless hours studying the Bible and science in the hopes …show more content…
He was a firm believer in the idea that the entirety of Creation evolved from one single microorganism. This single cell, began duplicating to form new species by a process of trial and error. The strongest organisms would continue evolving, and the weaker would die out through a process he dubbed, “natural selection.” One of his most famous books is titled, “The Origin of Species by Natural …show more content…
A prime example of this is the horse. Evolutionists and many archaeologists believe that the horse evolved from a small dog-like animal called eohippus, and evolved over the course of millions of years into what we know as equus ferus caballus, the modern horse. Their belief in this theory is wildly off-kilter. They claim to have evidence of the evolution of this mammal through it 's “transitional forms” from its predecessors to the horses we see today. Although in reality, they have only found approximately thirteen transitional fossils. How then, would they account for the apparent millennia of slow and steady transition from eohippus to equus ferus caballus without sufficient fossil