ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Net Neutrality

862 Words4 Pages

Net Neutrality Repeal:
Net Neutrality has been around since the 1990’s when the Internet started to get popular, but it was different back about 30 years ago since the Internet was just beginning and limited. Internet now has advanced and it’s a part of our daily lives, we have cell phones, laptops, tablets, desktops and even smart watches. Net Neutrality is letting big carriers to rule the Internet, prices and choices (“Net Neutrality”). This research is to show the negativities of the repeal of Net Neutrality. This repeal is a terrible act that the FCC has allowed, it will raise the prices, let lower websites go down, and will have limited options to pick from. The Federal Communications Commission as known as the FCC is the United States government …show more content…

With the cable completion in Internet prices this might make cable companies feel emboldened to spread the fees too (Attar 2). The bad news is the repeal for Net Neutrality bill was passed in December 14th 2017, but it hasn’t been put into place, nobody has heard anything about a set date yet. The Internet is used every day by us for research, entertainment, and businesses, but it’s uncommon to not see people using the Internet in some kind of way: Say there was a family and they used a service like Comcast for its Internet service, however Facebook was bought by Verizon, if the family wanted to use Facebook they would have to pay extra for it. If open Internet goes away, Internet providers can fund higher profile websites and let lower profile websites to struggle to stay in business. (Formm 23-24) Over a million people uses some kind of social media site or has a subscription to an entertainment website, like Netflix, Hulu and Amazon, people still have to pay to be able to get access to the products on there, so without Net Neutrality bigger companies can double the

Show More
Related
2950 Words | 12 Pages

The FCC is a government agency that regulates the radio, television and phone industries. The Federal Communication Commission regulates interstate communication for instance wire, satellite and cable, and international communication. The FCC originated from The Communication Act of 1934, which abolished the Federal radio commission. The Communication Act of 1934 was the barrier for all the communications rules in place today. This act expanded on the authority of the FCC to regulate public airwaves in the United Stated.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

The government, as stated in the Constitution, has inherent powers that are “few and defined” constitutionally only for the federal government to exercise. Within the government’s inherent powers are two categories, express and implied powers. The express powers of the government can be found in Article I, section eight and can be simplified down to: the ability to print money; regulate interstate trade; borrow money on the credit of the national government; establish bankruptcy, immigration, counterfeiting, copyright, and piracy laws; declare war; and raise the army and naval forces . In relation to the news article about Net-neutrality, the government has no express powers that pertain to the allowance of them over-turning the FCC’s old rules for the creation of new rules that benefit them and a select few more than the people of the U.S. In contrast, the government’s actions, for those that disagree with the decision that had been made, might attempt to persuade the people that the government’s use of their implied powers gives them the right to make such a change to the Net-neutrality rules.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

SUBJECT: Summary of FCC Rule on Net Neutrality In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission published a rule that classified Internet Service Providers (ISPs) as common carriers. The main decision behind this rule was the idea of “net neutrality,” or the principle that Internet service providers should treat all Internet data as the same regardless of its kind, source, or destination. The concept of net neutrality has been the subject of debate and controversy for quite some time, and now that the digital age is advancing at an even quicker rate, this concept is challenged more and more. FCC recently proposed a new rule that would reverse the 2015 classification of ISP’s back to lightly-regulated information services.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

So naturally when looking to see what others have said about this text, it found that they were all mostly in favor of net neutrality. Gregory down talks a recent ruling by the FCC, that after research, seemed to be something he should be praising. This is what the FCC changes actually did, This decision is a major legal victory not only for the FCC, but for all internet users (including you, since you're reading this online), who will continue to benefit from the Commission's open internet rules. These rules safeguard the principle of net neutrality, by preventing internet service providers from abusing their gatekeeper role to block or interfere with the ability of users to access the content of their choosing.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

It is this line of thinking that has the Internet Service Providers fighting tooth and nail to challenge or overturn anything that associated with the concept of Net Neutrality. The flagrent manner in which the industry is willing to spend money to hinder the momentum of the industry is discussed in the book, The Illusion of Net Neutrality by Bob and Eva Zelnick. “Going back to 2005 the principle's biggest opponents Verizon, AT&T, Comcast and their allies have lobbied against net neutrality about three times as hard as the biggest proponents of neutrality” (Zelnick and Zelnick 93). With the amount of money being spent to fight theses change equal to GDP of a small country it begs the question. Why are these factions so concerned?

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

FCC, US Telecom Association appealed against an order the FCC made which attempted to force broadband service providers to abide a set of rules which would enforce net neutrality. The FCC wanted all broadband providers to treat all internet traffic the same regardless of source. FCC had classified broadband services as telecommunications services which then made them common under Federal legislation. The court removed portions of the order and gave the telecommunications industry first crack at developing standards, and the Commission was only authorized to alter them if it found them deficient. However, the court sided with and upheld the FCC’S reclassification of broadband services as telecommunications services and they were subjective to any regulations under the FCC and the Communications Act of 1934.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

Shant Sahakian, in the informative and opinionated piece, “Repeal of Net Neutrality is bad for Education, Business, and You,” written in Los Angeles Times, on November 30, 2017, argues that repealing, therefore ending net neutrality would be detrimental and “the end of the internet we have always known and loved”, and that ending net neutrality will be bad for education, business, and anyone who believes that the internet should be free and equal to use by all persons who use it today. Sahakian’s evidence consists of various references and indications to the fact that ending net neutrality will be the end to internet freedom and equality as wells as an end to the fairness and equal opportunity that net neutrality gives us today. Sahakian also

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

"Net Neutrality: What_Ñés the Big Deal? Since 2015, the Federal Communications Commission_Ñés (FCC) net neutrality bill has been requiring all Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to have equal internet speed, accessibility, service and content availability. Its purpose was to diminish competition between networks as well as provide users with an equally reliable spectrum of websites and resources regardless of the network it is on. The rules that were protected by net neutrality disabled networks from blocking lawful content, slowing the transmission of data, and from creating slow and fast lanes with the basis of who paid more.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

The internet is a big part of most people's’ lives and they want to be able to use it fast and reliably. Net neutrality, the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or website, is what allows people to do this. It keeps companies from slowing down their competition and raising their prices. Now, net neutrality has been repealed, which means that internet service providers and other companies can slow down their competition and raise their prices. For some people this is not a problem but for people who do not have as much money, it can mean that they won't be able to afford these things.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The loss of the free and “open” internet will result in corporations such as Comcast and Verizon to distort the information that is released to their viewers. In consequence, the companies

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

Many high quality network companies are affected by the problem of Net Neutrality. Companies like verizon, AT&T, and CenturyLink, are all affected by the net neutrality. This is going to be the caause into a major war between companies and the government. Many people are going to be very irritated and not use internet at all. By people having to pay for other things off of their high quality network companies.

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Twitter data shows that the minority of people are tweeting about protecting #TitleII of the Communications Act, and the majority are tweeting about protecting #NetNeutrality. The third, and more neutral argument, suggests that the FCC should repeal the strong Title II regulation, but stay in support of Net Neutrality by reverting to Title I instead. A very limited number of people meet in the middle on both extremities, acknowledging that Title II does protect from ISPs being able to throttle and block certain websites; however, they also claim that the strong regulations have negative effects on consumers and competition as well. These problems could be remedied by a revision to the current Title II law. Out of the twenty-four consumer tweets gathered, only two had a similar outlook on the issue to this one.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The concept of net neutrality can make equality between peoples’ internet service and prevent carries from blocking or slowing down websites. If net neutrality comes to an end, carries will raise prices knowing many customers cannot afford the new prices. Therefore, they either spend extra money to get faster service or continue to be left behind. The internet has become very important to many and gives people the freedom to do whatever they want. The justification is only that companies are money hungry, and they do not care about others circumstances.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, The Liberal Arts are Dead: Long Live the Liberal Arts The author David M. Whalen gears this argumentative article towards the liberal art supporters, and towards those who oppose against it and believe that liberal arts are not important. This article is argumentative because the author goes back and forth explaining the thoughts about liberal arts from both points of view. The benefits of allowing both perspective and thoughts in the article is to show that there is contrast dealing with liberal arts and a person can choose for themselves on which side to agree with. Giving the reader a choice to understand both sides of a debate leads to a person becoming more interesting in knowing more about the argument.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

The strength of this article is that it is informative and brief. However the weakness of this article is that it’s mostly opinion based. My third article is “how is internet changing the way you think”. It’s based on different views of people about how the internet is changing the way we think. The strength of this article is that it’s very much brief.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Net Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document