ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

477 Words2 Pages

Although the physician assisted suicide has been controversial, Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act was enacted late October 1997. Because of this physicians can prescribe lethal doses of medication that terminally-ill patients can self-inject. That is how assisted suicide has legally developed in the state of Oregon. And if this law was enacted, it is because it is meant for the public’s best interest. As both sides of the debate have developed, how exactly has this been justifiable by both laws and ethics? The constitution provides individuals with the right to have their freedom unrestricted but also gives them the right to life, liberty and property. If this is true, constitutional rights of property mean that a person has the liberty to do whatever they want with their bodies, because they, themselves are their own property and have the right to end their own lives(Peterson, 23). …show more content…

Most people that are against this law might not realize that not every ill-person is able to perform assisted suicide. The constitution has allowed for these terminally-ill people to end the pain and suffering that they have endured and no longer want to deal with. As a country that promotes liberty, life, and property, we have a moral obligation to help that ending and suffering. That is because once life is almost to an end, liberty and property will no longer matter because a deceased person has no rights. The real issue with this law is not necessarily terminally ill-people ending their own lives, but having another person help them do it. Especially because suicide is not illegal, but assisted suicide has been controversial and has been tried to be outlawed many times. But the state of Oregon has become a model for these specific situations and how it is

Open Document