ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

1019 Words5 Pages

Animal Testing\ Experimentation Although animal testing has changed from many years until now, it is still a big issue in the world today. According to the article The Rights of Man and Animal Experimentation by John Martin, “If there is a need for animal experimentation in science for the good of man, this approach gives philosophical justification for experimentation”. It has been changing to help prevent cruelty towards animals during research and to get laws passed such as the Animal Welfare Act. This act requires that animals be cared for, have an adequate food and water supply, safe housing, and protection from extreme temperatures (freezing and burning). Although some people may view experimenting or testing as a cruel practice to animals, others view it as a scientific breakthrough. Conflict opinions and exaggerated information can also compound the confusion. Its helpful to examine some of the most important facts to better understands the different aspects of animal testing. More informed decisions could be made regarding your views. Although using these animals may seem morally wrong, ultimately it is justified by the many scientific findings. According to Animals in science: The Justification issue by Strachan Donnelley, “How …show more content…

According to the article The Rights of Man and Animal Experimentation by John Martin, “Some emotion give contradictory signals about animal experimentation in medical science, man’s relationship to animals must be based upon reason”. Thousands of rabbits, mice, and monkeys are used in these experiments. Medicines have to be tested to make sure they are safe for humans to use. Animals have to be used to show the impact of the medicine on the systems and the organs of the body. All of our basic medicines such as Advil, Tylenol, Motrin, Aspirin, and many others were tested on animals before we could use

Show More
Related
724 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of animals are being tested and some survive but some also die. Testing on millions of animals is cruel and should be stopped. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. They are mistreated. Animals experience physical restraint for long periods of time.

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Although animal testing is beneficial in some cases, it is cruel and unjustified because of the daily conditions animals have to suffer through, and how unnecessary it is considering the amount of different alternatives. II. Animal

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

Do you think it is wrong to test on innocent animals? Although you could argue the benefits of animal testing, there are many negatives to it as well. One of these negatives include the animals who are kept in captivity for the experiments. 115 million animals worldwide are used for experimenting every year according to Humane

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Seventy-three percent of animals every year are being put down due to animal cruelty. This percentage is proof of how much animal experimentation has increased in the last 15 years. This is because of the terrible care that animals are being put through, people debate about whether animal testing should happen at all. Some people believe though that animal testing is quite useful in many ways. The people that see animal testing as being useful, think that without animals, medicine and the military would not be where they are today.

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

Animal experimentation and testing is a widely controversial subject. Views on animal testing range from positivity to full negativity. Experimenting on animals helps save human lives but innocent animals pay the price. The argument surrounding animal testing is very old, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act.

Read More
2243 Words | 9 Pages

Bioscience and technology have been advancing in development, contributing to a better quality of life for people. Before distributing a new medicine, though, scientists have to use many tests to evaluate whether the new medicine is good or not and how it affects human health, along with any other side effects that might occur. Consequently, animals are science’s top testing samples for such experiments. In this way, there are two controversial arguments coming from the use of animals for testing. On one hand, there is support for these practices, while others totally disagree with these experiments.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

Intro: Animal testing is a very controversial topic throughout the world. Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Animals that are typically used for biomedical research include dogs, cats, ferrets, rabbits, pigs, sheep, monkeys, chimpanzees, and more because they have biological similarities to humans. Animal testing dates back to early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC), which performed experiments on living animals for research. The testing done on animals in the past was very severe, including full body restraints being used on animals and alternative methods that were also cruel.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Bedane Dereje Bedane Dr. Hilary ENGL. 1302-83422 Date 02/19/2016 Animal research should be justified "ANTI-ANIMALS-RESEARCH terrorists in the United States aim to terrify biomedical scientists into giving up their examination strategies, and these extremists are growing bolder" (Conn 1). Animal -based research is important. Scientific animal research is the most argued issue for several years. Many people in the USA have strong relationships with animals, and they consider animals as their family members.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Some proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories.(“Animal Testing”) Some opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results (“Animal Testing”). In my eyes as well as many others, I do not agree with any pros for animal testing. Animal testing is just cruel and has no purpose. Most of the time animals react differently to certain things than humans

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has been around for centuries, it started out to be for curiosity reasons; people wanted to learn more about the internal construction of the body, and animals were convenient--more so than humans. The word animal testing and animal research are interchangeable, both relate to the same thing: the experimentation that is carried out on animals. Louis Pasteur was one of the scientists who made the first major use with animal testing. While his conclusions were beneficial, that was back in 1880, a lot of technology has advanced since then. Although animal testing has been used for biomedical research in the past, now, in 2015, animal research has been concluded to be cost ineffective, increasingly inaccurate, and most importantly, how inhumane animal testing really is.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Animals have been exploited for many centuries in the name of science by private institutions, marketing industries, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. The use of animals in research is currently being debated to determine its efficacy. There have been many scientific proofs and failures resulting from animal research to determine its necessity. Aside from producing inaccurate results, animal testing is also a copious waste of resources and money. Animal experimentation should be halted and made illegal because it has been proven to be unreliable, wasteful and unethical in all cases.

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Scientific innovation is based on trial and error. Experiment upon experiment is conducted in order to ensure that a certain hypothesis or treatment is valid or safe. However, there is a growing controversy behind the morality of certain types of testing; especially on animals. Scientists have been conducting experiments on animals for centuries, which has resulted in many medical advances that would have otherwise taken much longer to realize. Consequently though, a great multitude of people has begun to advocate for animal rights in this area.

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

Animal rights and experimentation has been a heated debate over the decade. Using animals for experiments date back to almost 400 years ago when William Harvey discovered how the blood circulates in bodies. Also, statistics have proven that in the past century, animal experiments have been in almost every major medical advancement according to the World Health Organization and United States Department of Health and Human Services(Scientific,2). Using animals for experimentation is not just important for research but this leads into curing complex diseases and illnesses. Not only do animals play an important role in research, but arguing that animals deserve the same rights as humans will ultimately hurt the advancement in medicine and will

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

' Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us. '”. This contradiction reflects how hypocritical experimenters are towards animals. Many of us tend to place the value of an animal on how similar they are in physical appearance and how similar we see an animal to ourselves not by how they contribute to the Earth. Animals are keeping us alive this very second, we would cease to exist without them but they would flourish without us.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document