ipl-logo

Arguments Surrounding Animal Experimentation

636 Words3 Pages

Animal experimentation and testing is a widely controversial subject. Views on animal testing range from positivity to full negativity. Experimenting on animals helps save human lives but innocent animals pay the price.
The argument surrounding animal testing is very old, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides opposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.
Regarding this matter I have opinions on both sides. On one hand I agree with experiments on animals regarding biomedical researches on the other hand I do not agree with experiments on animals regarding cosmetics and product-testing.
In this work I am only going to state my opinions on the former.
Animals in Biomedical researches. …show more content…

(The Nuremberg Code, 1949) Experiments on animals allow us to not only better understand the laws of life and the mechanisms of individual life processes, but also to improve methods of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases, in both humans and animals.
Through animal experimentation, there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians, research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what the alternative could be. Experiments on animals are necessary in order to safeguard and improve human health and well-being, and vaccines for diseases such as polio and malaria could not have been developed without animal testing. This is how important animal experimentation is for humans and animals

Open Document