ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: An End To Animal Experimentation

1174 Words5 Pages

March 26, 2018
Argumentative Essay
College Composition 1

An End to Animal Experimentation
The history of animal experimentation dates to the third and fourth centuries from its creation of the ancient Greeks. The use of animal experimentation has created a better knowledge in the medical and dental fields over its vast life span. “The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals” (www.hsi.org). Animal experimentations has showed its worth over the years, but is it still …show more content…

Scientists are testing whether a product is toxic for humans by testing it on animals. It would be common sense to know if something is toxic to a human by having it tested on a human, not an animal. Experimenting on animals to determine the toxicity of a product for humans is like seeing how well a turtle can swim by throwing a tortoise in a pool of water. Although a tortoise highly resembles a turtle, they have their many differences. The same would go for humans and animals. To determine whether a product is toxic, scientists do a test called the “Lethal Dose 50”. “LD” stands for “lethal dose”; the “50” means that half the animals, or 50 percent of the animals forced to endure testing the product, will die at that dose” (www.thoughtco.com). The LD50 test usually averages sixty to sixty-five percent accuracy. Whenever in vitro testing is used, it measures eighty-five percent accuracy. Not only will the information gathered show how a human would react to a new product, but it also shows a higher accuracy in

Show More
Related
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Utilization of animals was routine for such checking, but now chromatography techniques are utilized for checking the purity, efficacy and calculation of dosages of drugs (Foreman et al., 1996). Overall, replacement substantially reduces the utilization of animals in various processes. Several alternative methods, which were scientifically validated and accepted by competent regulatory bodies, can be utilized for regulatory toxicology purposes, thus reducing or plenarily replacing living animals in toxicology experimentation. The acceptance of the alternative methods as valuable tools of modern toxicology has been recognized by regulators, including OECD, FDA and EPA.(Interdiscip Toxicol. 2011

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

Animal experimentation and testing is a widely controversial subject. Views on animal testing range from positivity to full negativity. Experimenting on animals helps save human lives but innocent animals pay the price. The argument surrounding animal testing is very old, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act.

Read More
1363 Words | 6 Pages

Drugs that pass animal testing are not safe to be putting into a human body. A sleeping pill Thalidomide was tested on animals before releasing to the public. The sleeping pill caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities and illnesses. Animal tests were performed for an arthritis drug known as Vioxx, the results showed that it had a protective effect on hearts of mice, yet the drug went on and caused more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before the labs pulled them from the market. 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

Animal experimentation saves many human lives. In “Medical Experiments on Animals Are an Important Element of Drug Development”, Patricia George and Geraldine Wagner claim that animal experimentation has helped treat polio, tuberculosis, malaria, and smallpox. Without animal experimentation, polio would kill thousands of people each year, most of the diabetics in America would die, and there would be millions of cases of rubella in the U.S. In “Vivisection Is Right, But It Is Nasty--

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Animals weren’t put on this earth to endur man-made products and chemicals. They weren’t made to be held captive by humans either, but humans don’t see the damage they are doing to these creatures. Some of the effects of animal testing include loss of hearing and the other senses, impaired movement, loss of the ability to reproduce, disfigurement of the body, and loss of life (the most common effect). These outcomes not only endanger the animal but the whole species, for if the animals can’t reproduce normally or they lose their life, the population of that species declines gradually over many years. This sad reality is transparent to the companies creating it, and as long as the product makes money these companies still oversee these issues and use animals to test these products.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Persuasive Essay: Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation has been seen either very wrong or necessary to do. Millions of people die each year from a number of diseases. “And every drug licensed for treatment has been tested by an animal” (Brooks 1). But also we have advanced in biomedical knowledge within that time. And people are asking, is animal experimentation necessary for our own health?

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

The End of Animal Testing is near . Some people might think that we won’t have another way on testing makeup, shampoo, or medicine. Others argue that animal testing is a good way to find deadly cures. The truth of the matter is that animal testing should be discontinued in our society. It is very important that we ban this inhumane way of testing products, or drugs on all of these poor animals.

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

Scientist shouldn’t use animals to test different products and procedures because impacts of the tests can lead animals to death, violates the rights of animals, and some test may not come out with the result they want, while the animal are left in great pain. Scientists shouldn’t apply animals to experiment different products and procedures because the impacts of the tests can lead the animals to death. These animals are going under tests and operations that could cause immediate death. According to Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing, “animals are subjected to agonizing pain, suffering, and death when they are used in laboratories and cosmetics testing, animals research must be stopped to prevent more waste of animal life.”

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles, and amphibians are exempted from from the manimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act. Registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and they use about or more than 12,000 animals. Animals die each year to this. (https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/arguments-against-animal-testing) Using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides little statistically useful insight, our recent analysis found.

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Among the myriad controversies that light up conversations and appear on untactful tongues, animal testing is no foreign one. Dating back to as late as the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, revered philosophers such as Aristotle and Socrates performed experiments on living animals, Roman physicians dissected goats and pigs, and Arab doctors practiced dissection on animals before performing surgeries on human patients (Animal Testing: A Long, Unpretty History, 2013). As long as experimentation has been a large proponent in enhancing human life, over 20 million animals each year double as experimental proxies, in addition to those playing the role of our furry best friends (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? 2017). Yet, as

Read More
1482 Words | 6 Pages

Think of animals as if they were yours, don’t hurt them. Let’s put yourself in the animals shoes, humans love chocolate, raisins, macadamia nuts , and grapes, but those things are toxic to dogs. If you experiment that on a dog first, then it might wouldn’t have even made it to humans because it’s so toxic to dogs. Instead of animal testing they should try human testing sounds a lot better.

Read More
1055 Words | 5 Pages

They assert that animal testing is useless because of the many cellular and anatomical differences between the human and the animal test subject. This statement is further supported by the 2013 study in the Archives of Toxicology that states that the lack of direct comparison between human data and that of a mouse makes the credibility of research data unreliable. Nevertheless, animal testing tries to ensure the safe use of medical drugs and other products by the public. As soon as a drug is produced, it is sent to animal testing laboratories and tested for safety. When the drug is deemed safe-to-use, scientists then send it to test on a human test subject, then to the general public.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

I’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Also there is the LD50 Test: A toxicity test used in animal testing that is performed until 50 percent of the animals are dead. Animals should not be required to be tested on before the use of a medical drug, cosmetic, or food additive. The use of animals in cosmetic experiments is immoral and wrong. The immoral and wrong practices can be shown through “the use of bunnies to test eye irritation to make sure the makeup is safe for humans, though testing is not required by law.”

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: An End To Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document