Insider trading has received a bad name in the recent decades. The popular press makes it sound as an evil practice where the people engage in are totally lacking of the ethical principles. Particularly all the articles have been written on insider trading that have been treated in the recent years as something as a wrongful act. The exceptions were drawn out by the work of Manne (1966) that people profit from the usage of the inside information such as the tax preparers use the expert knowledge of the tax law to save their clients from the excess money spent on the tax return preparation (McGee R. W., 2007). Arguments have been raised if insider trading is not a fraudulent act and therefore is it legitimate to legalise it? In favour of insider …show more content…
For example, for a grain merchant, there is no duty to disclose the residents of a starving city about the facts that hundred ships are filled with grain for just a day, but the duty is disclosed as the defects in a building is trying to sell. In the 1817, Ricardo had talked about its theory of comparative advantage; it had said that some individuals or groups naturally are better at something’s than others and in order to develop skills that are superior to those of their competitors. This penalizes those who are better off with the worse of at the results in inefficient outcomes and is unfair to some individuals or groups. Comparative advantages works as a benefit for the infinite mainstream of the population which allows for specialization and labour division which Adam Smith had pointed out in the 1776. The level of playing filed argument has a underlying premises for buying and selling of the inside information unethically when the information is asymmetric. But this information is often asymmetric in the world of business where one party to the transaction know more about the value of the items being exchanged than does the owner of the property that is being offered for sale to other parties (McGee R. W., 2009). The insider trading creates the problem of fairness which is an argument raised by jurists from the U.S Supreme Court in 1980, that what is fair to one persona may seem to be unfair to the other. Cho and Shaug (1991) had shifted their perception on insider trading to be unfair shifting the risk in favour of the insiders which leads or may lead to