ipl-logo

Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide

1130 Words5 Pages

Even with all the advances that America has had in their health care and their research with cancer treatments there are still patients that get diagnosed with terminal cancer and they have no hope. Dying is a natural thing that everyone will have to do at some point in their life. In the book Physician Assisted Suicide: Expanding the debate the Author talks about how people all have the right to live and with that should come the right to die (Battin, M. P.). This is also a moral decision and will vary with every person. Some people are at peace with dying while some fear it. The right to die should be granted to all terminally ill patients because this is a personal decision that no governing body should interfere with, it is safer for a …show more content…

If people are able to do this in the hospital it will be safer for everyone around them. If someone wants to go home and kill him or herself they could do it in a way that could hurt their family around them ever more. If they are in the hospital they can be made comfortable and can have their entire family around them and they can leave the world in comfort knowing they were loved and they went in the best way they could. This can even be done in someone’s home if they would rather be there. In an article by Tang, S. T. (2003) he states “Quality of life, availability and ability of family caregivers, concerns of being a burden to others, long-standing relationships with healthcare providers, and quality of healthcare were the major considerations in decision making regarding the place of death. Terminally ill patients with cancer acknowledged dying at their preferred place of death as highly important.” This is a perfect example of how it is known that people who are terminal would rather be made comfortable and be able to die in peace. If the states were to make this legal the patients who are in so much pain that they would rather die would be able to do that. These patients do not want to be a burden to those around them. If it was legal physicians could come to the place where the patient is most comfortable and they could have their loved ones around them and they would be able to go in a peaceful way. Breitbart, W., & Holland, J. C. (1993). State in the book Psychiatric aspects of symptom management in cancer patients that these patients who are terminal are often having suicidal

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

Doctors control the means, drugs that end life painlessly” (Jaret). Doctors hold the key, to end patients suffering it should be legal for doctors to help patients and patients should also have the right to make a decision that has to do with ending their life. According to Issues and Controversies “The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” (“Right to Die”). Patients have the right as citizens to have a say in the way they want to have a death on their own terms. Nobody should be withholding the right to die from a patient who is mentally competent and terminally ill (“Right to

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

No one should be able to assist in taking that away from someone even if it seems like the only solution to that person. I have never had a family member, friend, or myself experience a terminal illness or disability so it may seem easy for me to not support this. I cannot imagine what someone with a terminal illness or disability has to endure everyday for months and years at a time. However, I do know that life is a sacred thing that we were not meant to terminate ourselves. Doctors are meant to help save lives and discover cures to diseases.

Read More
1736 Words | 7 Pages

The dying patient no longer has quality of life, they have lost their independence, are lonely, are forced to endure inevitable pain, are publicly humiliated, are suffering immensely, and are forced to watch their loved ones grieve because of them. It is an innate Constitutional Right to choose how to die, since we all will die. There comes a point when the poking and prodding becomes too much, when the patient wants to just die in silence in the loving arms of their

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

(Expanding). Also doctors aren’t going to have to go through as much schooling for treatment if they can just kill them instead. You have to have skill and training to provide end of life care, but it doesn’t take skill to kill. It's a simple and affordable solution that puts an end to patients, not diseases. It gives physicians a lot power and makes people think that they are all mean so that

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

So why stick to the idea that killing a patient, even with their consent, is the correct thing to do in certain situations? People also put into perspective the thought that patients have the ability to sign a DNR (do not resuscitate). When patients are critical, they get the option to sign a DNR stating that when their heart happens to stop or they stop breathing, you do not have the right to help resuscitate them under any circumstances. Doctors should be helping patients to the best of their ability and if that patient happens to code (stop breathing or cardiac arrest) then they may have the opportunity to help end the patient’s life with the legal document

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

According to Karaim in 2013 “Decisions about sustaining life, allowing it to end or even hastening death are among the most difficult choices terminally ill patients and their families can face”

Read More
1728 Words | 7 Pages

Death is inevitable, it is something all living creatures must endure on this side of eternity. There is a multitude who will not be able to determine or choose when that time happens, life circumstances are usually out of the controlling grips of humanity. Despite that truth, as of 2015 there are five states in the U.S.A. where terminally ill persons eighteen or older with no more than six months to live are allowed to take their life with the assistance of a physician. California, Montana, Vermont, Washington, and Oregon, have all legalized the practice of physician assisted suicide (USA Today, PAS Dignity 2015). The act is generally committed by way of a prescribed lethal dose of medications intended to speed up the process of the patient 's

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

I am going to assume most of you know somebody or at least know people who know others with cancer, or a terminal illness. If i am right then you all know how it affects the person and the people around them. Everyone should be able to prevent a death with suffering or be able to control their own deaths if they are already going to be killed by their disease. I would much rather be able to chose how I die then let a disease kill me.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

People who are against physician assisted suicide often argue that those who want to end their life through euthanasia are often just calling for a “cry for help” as psychiatrists say (Ahmed). Advocates for euthanasia often say that there must be some sort of psychiatric evaluation before any other steps are taken. There was a study done that proved that many of those who were considering or committed suicide before, had some sort of physiatrist disorder (Ahmed). Out of the many people who had attempted suicide before in this study, 75% of them were unsure about whether they wanted to end their lives (Ahmed). Studies also show that those who do attempt suicide are mostly mentally ill (Ahmed).

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

For the terminally ill the decision of ending their lives with compassion should be a fundamental right, a personal

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

If death with dignity is legal in every state, so many people will be able to end their suffering on their own terms, but if not, terminal illness will continue to be met with a

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

Many patients who suffer from terminal illnesses often question if there will be a tomorrow. These patients often end their final days suffering because of unbearable pain. Those who suffer from a terminal illness often accept the idea of dying and refuse to take any medical treatments. Many of these patients wish to end their life in their own terms hoping to have a peaceful ending. Some wish to leave everything ready for when they are gone.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

Terminally-ill patients and their families are forced to make some of the toughest decisions anyone will ever have to consider. When it comes to end-of-life decisions, there are two main options that will help prevent unnecessary suffering. The use of a widely-accepted practice, a “do not resuscitate" order, which is a legal order to withhold life-saving interventions in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest. And an alternative option, which has been highly controversial and heavily debated over the past twenty years, is the “physician-assisted suicide” or “aid-in-dying” as it is referred to by supporters. As of 2015, California is the fifth US state to allow physician-assisted suicide after Vermont, Washington, Oregon, and Montana.

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

Doctors worldwide are against euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. According to a survey done back in March 2013 by the Canadian Medical Association, only 16% of Canadian doctors were willing to participate in assisted suicide. This is because there are now alternative ways, contrary to the popular belief; the only choices are not only die painfully and slowly or euthanasia. Programs such as Palliative care have been implemented for terminally ill patients, providing them with relief from the symptoms and stress caused by these serious illnesses. their goal is to improve the quality of life of not only the patient but also the family.

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

The Right to Die has been taking effect in many states and is rapidly spreading around the world. Patients who have life threatening conditions usually choose to die quickly with the help of their physicians. Many people question this right because of its inhumane authority. Euthanasia or assisted suicide are done by physicians to end the lives of their patients only in Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, New Mexico and soon California that have the Right to Die so that patients don’t have to live with depression, cancer and immobility would rather die quick in peace.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Physician Assisted Suicide

Related Topics

Open Document